R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte A[1999] UKHL 21, [1999] 2 AC 330, [1999] UKHL 21, [1999] 2 WLR 974 (1999), UKHL
E v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 49 QB 1044, 45 (EWCA (Civ) 2004) ("She was examined five days after the burglary by a police doctor who reported that her findings were consistent with the allegation of buggery.").
Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, Ex Parte A, 21 (UKHL 1999) ("... but, having been told that she should not ask for police statements as they would be produced at the hearing, it would not be surprising that she assumed that if there was a report from the Police Doctor, it would be made available with the police report.").
Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, Ex Parte A, 21 (UKHL 1999) ("It seems to me that the two provisions produce the following result ... (Lord Slynn)").
Regina v. Criminal Injuries Compensation Board Ex Parte A (A.P.) (House of Lords 25 March 1999), Text.
Regina v. Criminal Injuries Compensation Board Ex Parte A (A.P.) (House of Lords 25 March 1999) ("As Lord Slynn has pointed out, it is not necessary for the determination of the present appeal to enter upon the question whether error of fact can without more be relied upon as a ground for judicial review. (Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough)"), Text.
