Reproducibility Project (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Reproducibility Project" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

4doi.org

2^nd place

3worldcat.org

5^th place

2nih.gov

4^th place

2semanticscholar.org

11^th place

8^th place

1theatlantic.com

228^th place

158^th place

1wiley.com

222^nd place

297^th place

1theconversation.com

928^th place

651^st place

1wired.com

193^rd place

152^nd place

1apa.org

1,220^th place

1,102^nd place

1smu.edu.sg

low place

1handle.net

102^nd place

76^th place

1sciencenews.org

3,410^th place

2,939^th place

1cos.io

low place

1osf.io

7,153^rd place

4,975^th place

1bps.org.uk

low place

apa.org

Weir, Kristen. "A reproducibility crisis?". American Psychological Association. Retrieved 24 November 2016.

bps.org.uk

digest.bps.org.uk

"The Replication Crisis Lowers The Public's Trust In Psychology — But Can That Trust Be Built Back Up?". Research Digest. 31 October 2019. Retrieved 30 November 2019.

cos.io

"Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology". www.cos.io. Center for Open Science. Retrieved 19 January 2022.

doi.org

Nelson, Bryn; Wiles, Austin (15 September 2022). "A troubling lack of replicability for cancer biology studies: After an ambitious project struggled to replicate high-profile studies, researchers are calling for a new focus on protocol and data sharing as essential steps for building confidence in the field". Cancer Cytopathology. 130 (9): 656–657. doi:10.1002/cncy.22639. ISSN 1934-662X. PMID 36108146.
Open Science Collaboration (August 2015). "PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". Science. 349 (6251): aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716. hdl:10722/230596. PMID 26315443. S2CID 218065162.
Wingen, Tobias; Berkessel, Jana B.; Englich, Birte (24 October 2019). "No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology". Social Psychological and Personality Science. 11 (4): 454–463. doi:10.1177/1948550619877412. ISSN 1948-5506. S2CID 210383335.
Anvari, Farid; Lakens, Daniël (19 November 2019). "The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science". Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology. 3 (3): 266–286. doi:10.1080/23743603.2019.1684822. ISSN 2374-3603.

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

Open Science Collaboration (August 2015). "PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". Science. 349 (6251): aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716. hdl:10722/230596. PMID 26315443. S2CID 218065162.

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Nelson, Bryn; Wiles, Austin (15 September 2022). "A troubling lack of replicability for cancer biology studies: After an ambitious project struggled to replicate high-profile studies, researchers are calling for a new focus on protocol and data sharing as essential steps for building confidence in the field". Cancer Cytopathology. 130 (9): 656–657. doi:10.1002/cncy.22639. ISSN 1934-662X. PMID 36108146.
Open Science Collaboration (August 2015). "PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". Science. 349 (6251): aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716. hdl:10722/230596. PMID 26315443. S2CID 218065162.

osf.io

Wingen, Tobias; Berkessel, Jana B.; Englich, Birte (24 October 2019). "No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology". Social Psychological and Personality Science. 11 (4): 454–463. doi:10.1177/1948550619877412. ISSN 1948-5506. S2CID 210383335.

sciencenews.org

"Dozens of major cancer studies can't be replicated". Science News. 7 December 2021. Retrieved 19 January 2022.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Open Science Collaboration (August 2015). "PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". Science. 349 (6251): aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716. hdl:10722/230596. PMID 26315443. S2CID 218065162.
Wingen, Tobias; Berkessel, Jana B.; Englich, Birte (24 October 2019). "No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology". Social Psychological and Personality Science. 11 (4): 454–463. doi:10.1177/1948550619877412. ISSN 1948-5506. S2CID 210383335.

smu.edu.sg

ink.library.smu.edu.sg

Open Science Collaboration (August 2015). "PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". Science. 349 (6251): aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716. hdl:10722/230596. PMID 26315443. S2CID 218065162.

theatlantic.com

Yong, Ed (27 August 2015). "How Reliable Are Psychology Studies?". The Atlantic. Retrieved 7 November 2023.

theconversation.com

Loken, Eric (8 April 2019). "The replication crisis is good for science". The Conversation. Retrieved 7 November 2023.

wiley.com

acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Nelson, Bryn; Wiles, Austin (15 September 2022). "A troubling lack of replicability for cancer biology studies: After an ambitious project struggled to replicate high-profile studies, researchers are calling for a new focus on protocol and data sharing as essential steps for building confidence in the field". Cancer Cytopathology. 130 (9): 656–657. doi:10.1002/cncy.22639. ISSN 1934-662X. PMID 36108146.

wired.com

Apple, Sam (22 January 2017). "The Young Billionaire Behind the War on Bad Science". Wired.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Nelson, Bryn; Wiles, Austin (15 September 2022). "A troubling lack of replicability for cancer biology studies: After an ambitious project struggled to replicate high-profile studies, researchers are calling for a new focus on protocol and data sharing as essential steps for building confidence in the field". Cancer Cytopathology. 130 (9): 656–657. doi:10.1002/cncy.22639. ISSN 1934-662X. PMID 36108146.
Wingen, Tobias; Berkessel, Jana B.; Englich, Birte (24 October 2019). "No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology". Social Psychological and Personality Science. 11 (4): 454–463. doi:10.1177/1948550619877412. ISSN 1948-5506. S2CID 210383335.
Anvari, Farid; Lakens, Daniël (19 November 2019). "The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science". Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology. 3 (3): 266–286. doi:10.1080/23743603.2019.1684822. ISSN 2374-3603.