ResearchGate (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "ResearchGate" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
2nd place
2nd place
120th place
125th place
5th place
5th place
11th place
8th place
7th place
7th place
low place
low place
1,554th place
1,109th place
4th place
4th place
187th place
146th place
low place
low place
610th place
704th place
low place
7,659th place
18th place
17th place
low place
low place
3rd place
3rd place
low place
low place
207th place
136th place
54th place
48th place
12th place
11th place
low place
low place
1,356th place
870th place
99th place
77th place
5,477th place
3,008th place
712th place
526th place
low place
low place
102nd place
76th place
4,241st place
2,850th place
1,440th place
846th place
14th place
14th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,042nd place
2,171st place
low place
low place
1,160th place
737th place
low place
low place
1,248th place
1,104th place
234th place
397th place
low place
low place
low place
9,688th place

101innovations.wordpress.com

acs.org

cen.acs.org

aisnet.org

aisel.aisnet.org

archive.today

bloomberg.com

books.google.com

buffalo.edu

library.buffalo.edu

businessweek.com

chemistryworld.com

courtlistener.com

storage.courtlistener.com

discovermagazine.com

blogs.discovermagazine.com

doi.org

elsevier.com

forbes.com

fossilsandshit.com

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

  • Van Noorden, Richard (13 August 2014). "Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network". Nature. 512 (7513): 126–129. Bibcode:2014Natur.512..126V. doi:10.1038/512126a. PMID 25119221.
    Quote 1: ResearchGate is certainly well-known [...] More than 88% of scientists and engineers said that they were aware of it.
    Quote 2: "They do send you a lot of spam," Billie Swalla says
    Quote 3: [...] regularly sending out automated e-mails that profess to come from colleagues active on the site
    Quote 4: "I think it is a disgraceful kind of marketing and I am choosing not to use their service because of that", [Lars Arvestad] says
    Quote 5: "I've met basically no academics in my field with a favourable view of ResearchGate", says Daniel MacArthur
    Quote 6: Some of the apparent profiles on the site are not owned by real people, but are created automatically – and incompletely – by scraping details of people's affiliations, publication records and PDFs
    Quote 7: That annoys researchers who do not want to be on the site, and who feel that the pages misrepresent them – especially when they discover that ResearchGate will not take down the pages when asked.
    Quote 8: [Madisch] will not say how many of [the papers available on ResearchGate] have been automatically scraped from freely accessible places elsewhere.

jpma.org.pk

lisahinchliffe.com

nature.com

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Van Noorden, Richard (13 August 2014). "Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network". Nature. 512 (7513): 126–129. Bibcode:2014Natur.512..126V. doi:10.1038/512126a. PMID 25119221.
    Quote 1: ResearchGate is certainly well-known [...] More than 88% of scientists and engineers said that they were aware of it.
    Quote 2: "They do send you a lot of spam," Billie Swalla says
    Quote 3: [...] regularly sending out automated e-mails that profess to come from colleagues active on the site
    Quote 4: "I think it is a disgraceful kind of marketing and I am choosing not to use their service because of that", [Lars Arvestad] says
    Quote 5: "I've met basically no academics in my field with a favourable view of ResearchGate", says Daniel MacArthur
    Quote 6: Some of the apparent profiles on the site are not owned by real people, but are created automatically – and incompletely – by scraping details of people's affiliations, publication records and PDFs
    Quote 7: That annoys researchers who do not want to be on the site, and who feel that the pages misrepresent them – especially when they discover that ResearchGate will not take down the pages when asked.
    Quote 8: [Madisch] will not say how many of [the papers available on ResearchGate] have been automatically scraped from freely accessible places elsewhere.
  • Memon, Aamir Raoof (December 2016). "ResearchGate is no longer reliable: leniency towards ghost journals may decrease its impact on the scientific community" (PDF). Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 66 (12): 1643–1647. PMID 27924967. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-12-03. Retrieved 2016-12-02. ResearchGate more recently, has been lenient in its policies against this dark side of academic writing.

nytimes.com

nytimes.com

bits.blogs.nytimes.com

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

researchgate.net

researchgate.net

  • "ResearchGate turns 12". ResearchGate. Archived from the original on 2020-08-01. Retrieved 2020-08-12.
  • "About us". ResearchGate. Archived from the original on 2016-04-08. Retrieved 2016-04-09.
  • Why we’re removing the RG Score (and what’s next) Archived 2022-04-13 at the Wayback Machine ResearchGate. 2022.
  • "ACS, Elsevier, and ResearchGate resolve litigation, with solution to support researchers". ResearchGate Press Page. 15 September 2023. Retrieved 2023-09-20.

explore.researchgate.net

researchinformation.info

responsiblesharing.org

science.org

scilogs.de

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

sspnet.org

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org

swinburne.edu.au

blogs.swinburne.edu.au

techcrunch.com

theguardian.com

thenextweb.com

timeshighereducation.com

torontosun.com

unileon.es

buleria.unileon.es

unisg.ch

alexandria.unisg.ch

universityofcalifornia.edu

osc.universityofcalifornia.edu

venturevillage.eu

web.archive.org

wlv.ac.uk

scit.wlv.ac.uk

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org