Right-wing authoritarianism (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Right-wing authoritarianism" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
low place
low place
11th place
8th place
4th place
4th place
18th place
17th place
102nd place
76th place
8,208th place
5,328th place
120th place
125th place
1,220th place
1,102nd place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
1,903rd place
2,346th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
703rd place
501st place
207th place
136th place
731st place
638th place
26th place
20th place

apa.org

dictionary.apa.org

  • "Right-wing authoritarianism (RWA)". dictionary.apa.org. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. 2021. Retrieved 18 October 2021. A theoretical refinement of the theory of the authoritarian personality that identifies political conservatism, authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism as key predictors of prejudice, racism, and right-wing extremism. [first proposed in 1981 by Canadian social psychologist Robert A. Altemeyer]

apa.org

doi.org

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

  • Mavor, K. I.; Louis, W. R.; Sibley, C. G. (2010). "A bias-corrected exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of right-wing authoritarianism: Support for a three-factor structure". Personality and Individual Differences. 48 (1): 28–33. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.006. hdl:10023/3991.
  • See Mavor, K. I.; Macleod, C. J.; Boal, M. J.; Louis, W. R. (2009). "Right-wing authoritarianism, fundamentalism and prejudice revisited: Removing suppression and statistical artefact". Personality and Individual Differences. 46 (5–6): 592–597. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.016. hdl:10023/3990. S2CID 62786433.
  • Mavor, K. I.; Louis, W. R.; Laythe, B. (2011). "Religion, Prejudice, and Authoritarianism: Is RWA a Boon or Bane to the Psychology of Religion?". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 50 (1): 22–43. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01550.x. hdl:10023/4025.

harvard.edu

hup.harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

jst.go.jp

jstage.jst.go.jp

jstor.org

  • Meloen, J. D.; Van der Linden, G.; De Witte, H.; et al. (1996). "A test of the approaches of Adorno et al., Lederer and Altemeyer of authoritarianism in Belgian Flanders: A research note". Political Psychology. 17 (4): 643–656. doi:10.2307/3792131. JSTOR 3792131.

monmouth.edu

morningconsult.com

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

psypost.org

researchgate.net

sagepub.com

journals.sagepub.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

  • Palmer, Carl (2014). The Prejudiced Personality? Using the Big Five to Predict Susceptibility to Stereotyping Behavior. APSA. Illinois State University – Department of Politics and Government. SSRN 2455759.

theauthoritarians.org

  • Bob Altemeyer (March 2, 2022). "A Shorter Version of the RWA Scale". theauthoritarians.org.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 1 Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 1: "Secondly, they usually avoid anything approaching a fair fight. Instead they aggress when they believe right and might are on their side. “Right” for them means, more than anything else, that their hostility is (in their minds) endorsed by established authority, or supports such authority. “Might” means they have a huge physical advantage over their target, in weaponry say, or in numbers, as in a lynch mob. It's striking how often authoritarian aggression happens in dark and cowardly ways, in the dark, by cowards who later will do everything they possibly can to avoid responsibility for what they did. Women, children, and others unable to defend themselves are typical victims." Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 2 Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 1 Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 1 Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 3 Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 4: "They can be woefully uninformed about things they oppose, but they prefer ignorance and want to make others become as ignorant as they. They are also surprisingly uninformed about the things they say they believe in, and deep, deep, deep down inside many of them have secret doubts about their core belief." Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 3: "And when I give feedback lectures to classes about my studies and describe right-wing authoritarians, it turns out the high RWAs in the room almost always think I am talking about someone else." Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 5: "The high RWAs went along with the unethical decision a lot more than the low RWAs did. In fact they liked it, they said in private afterwards, it was the right thing to do, and they gave their boss a high rating. The less authoritarian students did not like the boss's decision and said so, and they did not like the boss either." Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 3: "Then once they have “their” ideas, someone who comes along and says what authoritarian followers want to hear becomes trustworthy. High RWAs largely ignore the reasons why someone might have ulterior motives for saying what they want to hear; it's enough for them that another person indicates they are right." Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 5: "In a similar vein, remember those “group cohesiveness” items in chapter 3, such as, “For any group to succeed, all its members have to give it their complete loyalty.” We saw that authoritarian followers endorse such sentiments. But social dominators do not. Oh sure, they want their followers to be super loyal to the group they lead. But they themselves are not really in it so much for the group or its cause, but more for themselves. It's all about them, not about a higher purpose. If trouble arises, don't be surprised if they start playing “Every man for himself” and even sell out the group to save their own skin." Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 5: "Persons who score highly on the Social Dominance scale do not usually have all the nooks and crannies, contradictions and lost files in their mental life that we find in high RWAs. Most of them do not show weak reasoning abilities, highly compartmentalized thinking, and certainly not a tendency to trust people who tell them what they want to hear. They've got their head together. Nor are most of them dogmatic or particularly zealous about any cause or philosophy. [...] So like high RWAs, social dominators are quite capable of hypocrisy—the difference being that the RWAs probably don't realize the hypocrisy because their thinking is so compartmentalized, whereas the dominators do but don't care." Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 5: "However when it comes to racial and ethnic minorities, right-wing authoritarians will still aggress—overtly or sneakily, physically or verbally—but such attacks are less clearly supported by religious and civic authorities than they used to be. So their prejudice in these cases has dropped some. But not that of social dominators." Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 1: "An authoritarian follower submits excessively to some authorities, aggresses in their name, and insists on everyone following their rules. If these authorities are the established authorities in society, that’s right-wing authoritarianism. If one submits to authorities who want to overthrow the establishment, that’s left-wing authoritarianism, as I define things." Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.
  • Altemeyer (2010). The Authoritarians, chpt. 2 Bob Altemeyer (2010) [2006]. The Authoritarians. Lulu.

umanitoba.ca

home.cc.umanitoba.ca

ussc.edu.au

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org