Router (computing) (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Router (computing)" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
2nd place
2nd place
652nd place
515th place
2,882nd place
2,105th place
214th place
176th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
360th place
231st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
153rd place
151st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
459th place
360th place
615th place
407th place
low place
9,935th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,948th place
1,879th place
11th place
8th place
low place
low place
1,994th place
1,215th place
6th place
6th place
1,185th place
840th place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
198th place
154th place
4,121st place
2,662nd place
1,514th place
1,024th place

acm.org

dl.acm.org

  • Edmondson-Yurkanan, Chris (2007). "SIGCOMM's archaeological journey into networking's past". Communications of the ACM. 50 (5): 63–68. doi:10.1145/1230819.1230840. ISSN 0001-0782. INWG#1: Report of Subgroup 1 on Communication System Requirements by Davies, Shanks, Heart, Barker, Despres, Detwiler, and Riml. They wrote: "It was agreed that interworkingbetween packet switching networks should not add complications to the hosts, considering that networks will probably be different and thus gatewaysbetween networks will be required. These gateways should be as uncomplicated as possible, whilst allowing as much freedom as possible for the design of individual networks". INWG#1 clarified that gateways and simplicity were accepted concepts when INWG was formed.

archive.org

books.google.com

businesswire.com

cisco.com

ciscopress.com

doi.org

examcollection.com

gla.ac.uk

dcs.gla.ac.uk

govtech.com

historyofcomputercommunications.info

ieee.org

ieeexplore.ieee.org

corporate-awards.ieee.org

ietf.org

datatracker.ietf.org

inc.com

  • Haughney Dare-Bryan, Christine (June 22, 2023). Computer Freaks (Podcast). Chapter Two: In the Air. Inc. Magazine. 35:55 minutes in. Leonard Kleinrock: Donald Davies ... did make a single node packet switch before ARPA did

internethalloffame.org

ispfamily.com

iteagers.com

ithistory.org

itif.org

juniper.net

microsoft.com

social.technet.microsoft.com

my-technet.com

networkworld.com

num.edu.mn

cisco.num.edu.mn

oed.com

oracle.com

docs.oracle.com

packet.cc

  • Roberts, Dr. Lawrence G. (May 1995). "The ARPANET & Computer Networks". Archived from the original on 24 March 2016. Retrieved 13 April 2016. Then in June 1966, Davies wrote a second internal paper, "Proposal for a Digital Communication Network" In which he coined the word packet,- a small sub part of the message the user wants to send, and also introduced the concept of an interface computer to sit between the user equipment and the packet network.
  • Roberts, Lawrence (22 July 2003). "The Next Generation of IP - Flow Routing". Archived from the original on 4 April 2015. Retrieved 22 February 2015.

pbs.org

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

  • John S, Quarterman; Josiah C, Hoskins (1986). "Notable computer networks". Communications of the ACM. 29 (10): 932–971. doi:10.1145/6617.6618. S2CID 25341056. The first packet-switching network was implemented at the National Physical Laboratories in the United Kingdom. It was quickly followed by the ARPANET in 1969.

tcpipguide.com

telecomsportal.com

topquark.co.uk

  • Scantlebury, Roger (2001). A Brief History of the NPL Network. Symposium of the Institution of Analysts & Programmers 2001. Archived from the original on 2003-08-07. Retrieved 2024-06-13. The system first went 'live' early in 1969

umich.edu

safecomputing.umich.edu

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

  • Edmondson-Yurkanan, Chris (2007). "SIGCOMM's archaeological journey into networking's past". Communications of the ACM. 50 (5): 63–68. doi:10.1145/1230819.1230840. ISSN 0001-0782. INWG#1: Report of Subgroup 1 on Communication System Requirements by Davies, Shanks, Heart, Barker, Despres, Detwiler, and Riml. They wrote: "It was agreed that interworkingbetween packet switching networks should not add complications to the hosts, considering that networks will probably be different and thus gatewaysbetween networks will be required. These gateways should be as uncomplicated as possible, whilst allowing as much freedom as possible for the design of individual networks". INWG#1 clarified that gateways and simplicity were accepted concepts when INWG was formed.