"Undergrowth, 1889". Permanent Collection. Van Gogh Museum. 2005–2011. Retrieved 25 April 2011.
"Undergrowth, 1889". Permanent Collection. Van Gogh Museum. 2005–2011. Retrieved 25 April 2011.
"Emperor Moth, 1889". Permanent Collection. Van Gogh Museum. 2005–2011. Retrieved 15 April 2011.
web.archive.org
Wildegans, R. "Van Gogh's Ear". Dr. Rita Wildegans. Archived from the original on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 27 April 2011"It can be said that with the exception of the sister-in-law Johanna van Gogh-Bonger, who had family-related reasons for playing down the injury, not a single witness speaks of a severed earlobe. On the contrary, the mutually independent statements by the principal witness Paul Gauguin, the prostitute who was given the ear, the gendarme who was on duty in the red-light district, the investigating police officer and the local newspaper report, accord with the evidence that the artist's unfortunate "self-mutilation" involves the entire (left) ear. The existing handwritten and clearly worded medical reports by three different physicians, all of whom observed and treated Vincent van Gogh over an extended period of time in Arles as well as in Saint-Rémy ought to provide ultimate proof of the fact that the artist was missing an entire ear and not just an earlobe."{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
Wildegans, R. "Van Gogh's Ear". Dr. Rita Wildegans. Archived from the original on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 27 April 2011"It can be said that with the exception of the sister-in-law Johanna van Gogh-Bonger, who had family-related reasons for playing down the injury, not a single witness speaks of a severed earlobe. On the contrary, the mutually independent statements by the principal witness Paul Gauguin, the prostitute who was given the ear, the gendarme who was on duty in the red-light district, the investigating police officer and the local newspaper report, accord with the evidence that the artist's unfortunate "self-mutilation" involves the entire (left) ear. The existing handwritten and clearly worded medical reports by three different physicians, all of whom observed and treated Vincent van Gogh over an extended period of time in Arles as well as in Saint-Rémy ought to provide ultimate proof of the fact that the artist was missing an entire ear and not just an earlobe."{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
