Sampling (signal processing) (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Sampling (signal processing)" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
low place
low place
206th place
124th place
2nd place
2nd place
179th place
183rd place
5,064th place
5,340th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,911th place
6,872nd place
low place
low place
207th place
136th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
32nd place
21st place
low place
8,202nd place

aes.org (Global: 9,911th place; English: 6,872nd place)

analog.com (Global: low place; English: 8,202nd place)

audient.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

  • Martin H. Weik (1996). Communications Standard Dictionary. Springer. ISBN 0412083914.
  • Rao, R. (2008). Signals and Systems. Prentice-Hall Of India Pvt. Limited. ISBN 9788120338593.
  • Self, Douglas (2012). Audio Engineering Explained. Taylor & Francis US. pp. 200, 446. ISBN 978-0240812731.
  • Walt Kester (2003). Mixed-signal and DSP design techniques. Newnes. p. 20. ISBN 978-0-7506-7611-3. Retrieved 8 January 2014.
  • William Morris Hartmann (1997). Signals, Sound, and Sensation. Springer. ISBN 1563962837.

digitalprosound.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

gearslutz.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • Lavry, Dan. "The Optimal Sample Rate for Quality Audio". Gearslutz. Retrieved 2018-11-10. I am trying to accommodate all ears, and there are reports of few people that can actually hear slightly above 20KHz. I do think that 48 KHz is pretty good compromise, but 88.2 or 96 KHz yields some additional margin.
  • Lavry, Dan. "To mix at 96k or not?". Gearslutz. Retrieved 2018-11-10. Nowdays [sic] there are a number of good designers and ear people that find 60-70KHz sample rate to be the optimal rate for the ear. It is fast enough to include what we can hear, yet slow enough to do it pretty accurately.

getsatisfaction.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

ghostarchive.org (Global: 32nd place; English: 21st place)

headphonesty.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

hypertextbook.com (Global: 5,064th place; English: 5,340th place)

lavryengineering.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • Lavry, Dan (May 3, 2012). "The Optimal Sample Rate for Quality Audio" (PDF). Lavry Engineering Inc. Although 60 KHz would be closer to the ideal; given the existing standards, 88.2 KHz and 96 KHz are closest to the optimal sample rate.

open-flash.github.io (Global: low place; English: low place)

pioneer-audiovisual.eu (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • "SX-S30DAB | Pioneer". www.pioneer-audiovisual.eu. Archived from the original on 2018-12-18. Retrieved 2018-12-18. Supported sampling rates: 44.1 kHz, 48 kHz, 64 kHz, 88.2 kHz, 96 kHz, 176.4 kHz, 192 kHz

proquest.com (Global: 206th place; English: 124th place)

public.ebookcentral.proquest.com

psu.edu (Global: 207th place; English: 136th place)

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

  • Stuart, J. Robert (1998). Coding High Quality Digital Audio. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.501.6731. both psychoacoustic analysis and experience tell us that the minimum rectangular channel necessary to ensure transparency uses linear PCM with 18.2-bit samples at 58 kHz. ... there are strong arguments for maintaining integer relationships with existing sampling rates – which suggests that 88.2 kHz or 96 kHz should be adopted.

restoring78s.co.uk (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • "The restoration procedure – part 1". Restoring78s.co.uk. Archived from the original on 2009-09-14. Retrieved 2011-01-18. For most records a sample rate of 22050 in stereo is adequate. An exception is likely to be recordings made in the second half of the century, which may need a sample rate of 44100.

rme-audio.de (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • "RME: Hammerfall DSP 9632". www.rme-audio.de. Retrieved 2018-12-18. Supported sample frequencies: Internally 32, 44.1, 48, 64, 88.2, 96, 176.4, 192 kHz.

sonicscoop.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • Colletti, Justin (February 4, 2013). "The Science of Sample Rates (When Higher Is Better—And When It Isn't)". Trust Me I'm a Scientist. Retrieved February 6, 2013. in many cases, we can hear the sound of higher sample rates not because they are more transparent, but because they are less so. They can actually introduce unintended distortion in the audible spectrum

soundstagehifi.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • Siau, John (21 October 2010). "96 kHz vs. 192 kHz". SoundStage!HI-FI. be very careful about any claims that 192 kHz sounds better than 96 kHz. Our experience points in the opposite direction.

stanford.edu (Global: 179th place; English: 183rd place)

steinberg.help (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • Cristina Bachmann, Heiko Bischoff; Schütte, Benjamin. "Customize Sample Rate Menu". Steinberg WaveLab Pro. Retrieved 2018-12-18. Common Sample Rates: 64 000 Hz

voipsupply.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

zaxcom.com (Global: low place; English: low place)