Sans forgetica (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Sans forgetica" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

5^th place

5^th place

2web.archive.org

1^st place

1^st place

2sansforgetica.rmit

low place

low place

2^nd place

2^nd place

1sciencedaily.com

993^rd place

920^th place

1washingtonpost.com

34^th place

27^th place

low place

low place

1teachermagazine.com.au

low place

low place

9,751^st place

7,165^th place

low place

low place

4^th place

4^th place

1semanticscholar.org

11^th place

8^th place

1,220^th place

1,102^nd place

apa.org

doi.apa.org

Cushing, Cassandra; Bodner, Glen E. (September 2022). "Reading aloud improves proofreading (but using Sans Forgetica font does not)". Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 11 (3): 427–436. doi:10.1037/mac0000011. ISSN 2211-369X.

doi.org

Geller, Jason; Davis, Sara D.; Peterson, Daniel J. (2020-07-29). "Sans Forgetica is not desirable for learning". Memory. 28 (8): 957–967. doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1797096. ISSN 0965-8211. PMID 32723219. S2CID 220847703.
Cushing, Cassandra; Bodner, Glen E. (September 2022). "Reading aloud improves proofreading (but using Sans Forgetica font does not)". Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 11 (3): 427–436. doi:10.1037/mac0000011. ISSN 2211-369X.

newswise.com

"Previously claimed memory boosting font "Sans Forgetica" does not actually boost memory". www.newswise.com. Retrieved 2020-08-03.

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Geller, Jason; Davis, Sara D.; Peterson, Daniel J. (2020-07-29). "Sans Forgetica is not desirable for learning". Memory. 28 (8): 957–967. doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1797096. ISSN 0965-8211. PMID 32723219. S2CID 220847703.

psyarxiv.com

Geller, Jason; Davis, Sara D.; Peterson, Daniel J. (2020-07-29). "Sans Forgetica is not desirable for learning". Memory. 28 (8): 957–967. doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1797096. ISSN 0965-8211. PMID 32723219. S2CID 220847703.

rmit.edu.au

"Sans Forgetica: new typeface designed to help students study". www.rmit.edu.au. Retrieved 2022-08-19.

sansforgetica.rmit

"Sans Forgetica". sansforgetica.rmit. Archived from the original on 2020-06-11. Retrieved 2019-12-14.
"Sans Forgetica - RMIT". 2020-08-26. Archived from the original on 2020-08-26. Retrieved 2022-08-19.

sciencedaily.com

"Previously claimed memory boosting font 'Sans Forgetica' does not actually boost memory". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 2020-05-29.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Geller, Jason; Davis, Sara D.; Peterson, Daniel J. (2020-07-29). "Sans Forgetica is not desirable for learning". Memory. 28 (8): 957–967. doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1797096. ISSN 0965-8211. PMID 32723219. S2CID 220847703.

teachermagazine.com.au

Earp, Jo (2018-10-08). "Q&A: Designing a font to help students remember key information". Teacher Magazine. Australian Council for Educational Research.

washingtonpost.com

"Researchers create new font designed to boost your memory". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2022-08-19.

web.archive.org

"Sans Forgetica". sansforgetica.rmit. Archived from the original on 2020-06-11. Retrieved 2019-12-14.
"Sans Forgetica - RMIT". 2020-08-26. Archived from the original on 2020-08-26. Retrieved 2022-08-19.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

"Researchers create new font designed to boost your memory". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2022-08-19.
Geller, Jason; Davis, Sara D.; Peterson, Daniel J. (2020-07-29). "Sans Forgetica is not desirable for learning". Memory. 28 (8): 957–967. doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1797096. ISSN 0965-8211. PMID 32723219. S2CID 220847703.
Cushing, Cassandra; Bodner, Glen E. (September 2022). "Reading aloud improves proofreading (but using Sans Forgetica font does not)". Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 11 (3): 427–436. doi:10.1037/mac0000011. ISSN 2211-369X.