Scopus (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Scopus" in English language version.

Last modified: 23:34:43, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Ref.Un. Ref.Website

Global rank English rank

1111doi.org

2^nd place

99nih.gov

5^th place

88web.archive.org

1^st place

77worldcat.org

4^th place

44elsevier.com

365^th place

372^nd place

22hdl.handle.net

66^th place

34^th place

22semanticscholar.org

15^th place

8^th place

11ingentaconnect.com

3,367^th place

3,282^nd place

11mit.edu

476^th place

340^th place

11ctfassets.net

5,605^th place

5,753^rd place

11usf.edu

3,578^th place

2,097^th place

11springer.com

182^nd place

172^nd place

11scopus.com

6,900^th place

4,763^rd place

11scopusfeedback.com

low place

11adsabs.harvard.edu

14^th place

9^th place

11highyieldmed.org

low place

11theguardian.com

16^th place

11^th place

11researchgate.net

96^th place

89^th place

11indexhub.info

low place

11cerge-ei.cz

low place

11arphahub.com

low place

11insidehighered.com

4,021^st place

2,075^th place

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14^th place; English: 9^th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

Else, Holly (15 August 2018). "How Unpaywall is transforming open science". Nature. 560 (7718): 290–291. Bibcode:2018Natur.560..290E. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05968-3. PMID 30111793.

arphahub.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

ese.arphahub.com

Tennant, Jonathan P. (27 October 2020). "Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge". European Science Editing. 46 e51987. doi:10.3897/ese.2020.e51987. ISSN 2518-3354.

cerge-ei.cz (Global: low place; English: low place)

idea-en.cerge-ei.cz

"IDEA Study 2 2017 Predatory journals in Scopus". idea-en.cerge-ei.cz. Archived from the original on 27 July 2021. Retrieved 14 August 2021.

ctfassets.net (Global: 5,605^th place; English: 5,753^rd place)

assets.ctfassets.net

"Scopus Content Coverage Guide" (PDF). Elsevier. 14 February 2025. Retrieved 14 February 2025.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

Huang, Ying; Li, Ruinan; Zhang, Lin; Sivertsen, Gunnar (8 April 2021). Yang, Liying (ed.). "A comprehensive analysis of the journal evaluation system in China". Quantitative Science Studies. 2 (1). The MIT Press: 300–326. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00103. eISSN 2641-3337. hdl:11250/2733769. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
Kulkarni, A. V.; Aziz, B.; Shams, I.; Busse, J. W. (2009). "Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals". JAMA. 302 (10): 1092–6. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1307. PMID 19738094.
Burnham, Judy F. (8 March 2006). "Scopus database: a review". Biomedical Digital Libraries. 3 (1) 1. BioMed Central. doi:10.1186/1742-5581-3-1. ISSN 1742-5581. PMC 1420322. PMID 16522216.
Echchakoui, Saïd (2020). "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: The case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019". Journal of Marketing Analytics. 8 (3): 165–184. doi:10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9. S2CID 256510471. Archived from the original on 18 May 2023. Retrieved 18 May 2023.
Brembs, Björn (2018). "Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 12 37. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037. PMC 5826185. PMID 29515380.
Else, Holly (15 August 2018). "How Unpaywall is transforming open science". Nature. 560 (7718): 290–291. Bibcode:2018Natur.560..290E. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05968-3. PMID 30111793.
Tarazi, Alaa (1 June 2024). "Comparative Analysis of the Bibliographic Data Sources Using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Lens: Comparative Analysis of Bibliographic Data Sources". High Yield Medical Reviews. 2 (1). High Yield Medicine. doi:10.59707/hymrUNHW4628. ISSN 2960-1630. Retrieved 29 May 2025.
Ortega, José Luis; Delgado‑Quirós, Lorena (28 June 2024). "The indexation of retracted literature in seven principal scholarly databases: a coverage comparison of dimensions, OpenAlex, PubMed, Scilit, Scopus, The Lens and Web of Science". Scientometrics. 129 (7). Springer Nature: 3769–3785. doi:10.1007/s11192-024-05034-y. eISSN 1588-2861. hdl:10261/382751. ISSN 0138-9130.
Yin, Min; Zhao, Chenpei; You, Jia; Ding, Wenzhi; Jiang, Dongdong; Tian, Yuyin; Shi, Lin; Leng, Lin (14 February 2025). Berry, Simon (ed.). "Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of the Status of Scleral Lens Research Based on the Web of Science Database and Scopus Database (2014-2024)". Clinical Optometry. 17. Dove Medical Press: 47–60. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S495970. ISSN 1179-2752. PMC 11834708. PMID 39967862.
Singh Chawla, Dalmeet (8 February 2021). "Hundreds of 'predatory' journals indexed on leading scholarly database". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00239-0. PMID 33558751. S2CID 231871351.
Tennant, Jonathan P. (27 October 2020). "Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge". European Science Editing. 46 e51987. doi:10.3897/ese.2020.e51987. ISSN 2518-3354.

elsevier.com (Global: 365^th place; English: 372^nd place)

elsevier.com

"Scopus Content Overview: Content Policy and Selection". Scopus Info. Elsevier. Archived from the original on 24 April 2015. Retrieved 4 September 2013.
"extlistJune2021". Archived from the original on 21 July 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
"The importance of high-quality content: curation and reevaluation in Scopus" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.

service.elsevier.com

"How are CiteScore metrics used in Scopus?". Scopus: Access and use Support Center. 29 July 2022. Retrieved 24 May 2023.

hdl.handle.net (Global: 66^th place; English: 34^th place)

Huang, Ying; Li, Ruinan; Zhang, Lin; Sivertsen, Gunnar (8 April 2021). Yang, Liying (ed.). "A comprehensive analysis of the journal evaluation system in China". Quantitative Science Studies. 2 (1). The MIT Press: 300–326. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00103. eISSN 2641-3337. hdl:11250/2733769. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
Ortega, José Luis; Delgado‑Quirós, Lorena (28 June 2024). "The indexation of retracted literature in seven principal scholarly databases: a coverage comparison of dimensions, OpenAlex, PubMed, Scilit, Scopus, The Lens and Web of Science". Scientometrics. 129 (7). Springer Nature: 3769–3785. doi:10.1007/s11192-024-05034-y. eISSN 1588-2861. hdl:10261/382751. ISSN 0138-9130.

highyieldmed.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

hymr.highyieldmed.org

Tarazi, Alaa (1 June 2024). "Comparative Analysis of the Bibliographic Data Sources Using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Lens: Comparative Analysis of Bibliographic Data Sources". High Yield Medical Reviews. 2 (1). High Yield Medicine. doi:10.59707/hymrUNHW4628. ISSN 2960-1630. Retrieved 29 May 2025.

indexhub.info (Global: low place; English: low place)

"Scopus Indexed Journals". IndexHub. 31 December 2024. Retrieved 31 December 2024.

ingentaconnect.com (Global: 3,367^th place; English: 3,282^nd place)

annurev.publisher.ingentaconnect.com

Goodman, David; Deis, Louise (January 2005). "Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus". The Charleston Advisor. 6 (3). Annual Reviews: 5–21. eISSN 1525-4003. ISSN 1525-4011. Retrieved 12 August 2023.

insidehighered.com (Global: 4,021^st place; English: 2,075^th place)

Straumsheim, Carl. "How to Measure Impact". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 13 August 2023.

mit.edu (Global: 476^th place; English: 340^th place)

direct.mit.edu

Huang, Ying; Li, Ruinan; Zhang, Lin; Sivertsen, Gunnar (8 April 2021). Yang, Liying (ed.). "A comprehensive analysis of the journal evaluation system in China". Quantitative Science Studies. 2 (1). The MIT Press: 300–326. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00103. eISSN 2641-3337. hdl:11250/2733769. Retrieved 19 May 2023.

nih.gov (Global: 5^th place; English: 5^th place)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Kulkarni, A. V.; Aziz, B.; Shams, I.; Busse, J. W. (2009). "Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals". JAMA. 302 (10): 1092–6. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1307. PMID 19738094.
Burnham, Judy F. (8 March 2006). "Scopus database: a review". Biomedical Digital Libraries. 3 (1) 1. BioMed Central. doi:10.1186/1742-5581-3-1. ISSN 1742-5581. PMC 1420322. PMID 16522216.
Brembs, Björn (2018). "Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 12 37. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037. PMC 5826185. PMID 29515380.
Else, Holly (15 August 2018). "How Unpaywall is transforming open science". Nature. 560 (7718): 290–291. Bibcode:2018Natur.560..290E. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05968-3. PMID 30111793.
Yin, Min; Zhao, Chenpei; You, Jia; Ding, Wenzhi; Jiang, Dongdong; Tian, Yuyin; Shi, Lin; Leng, Lin (14 February 2025). Berry, Simon (ed.). "Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of the Status of Scleral Lens Research Based on the Web of Science Database and Scopus Database (2014-2024)". Clinical Optometry. 17. Dove Medical Press: 47–60. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S495970. ISSN 1179-2752. PMC 11834708. PMID 39967862.
Singh Chawla, Dalmeet (8 February 2021). "Hundreds of 'predatory' journals indexed on leading scholarly database". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00239-0. PMID 33558751. S2CID 231871351.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Burnham, Judy F. (8 March 2006). "Scopus database: a review". Biomedical Digital Libraries. 3 (1) 1. BioMed Central. doi:10.1186/1742-5581-3-1. ISSN 1742-5581. PMC 1420322. PMID 16522216.
Brembs, Björn (2018). "Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 12 37. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037. PMC 5826185. PMID 29515380.
Yin, Min; Zhao, Chenpei; You, Jia; Ding, Wenzhi; Jiang, Dongdong; Tian, Yuyin; Shi, Lin; Leng, Lin (14 February 2025). Berry, Simon (ed.). "Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of the Status of Scleral Lens Research Based on the Web of Science Database and Scopus Database (2014-2024)". Clinical Optometry. 17. Dove Medical Press: 47–60. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S495970. ISSN 1179-2752. PMC 11834708. PMID 39967862.

researchgate.net (Global: 96^th place; English: 89^th place)

Wilches-Visbal JH, Pérez-Anaya O, Castillo-Pedraza MC. Discontinued Reasons of Journals in Scopus: Analysis and Reflections. Bibl, An Investig. 2024;20(1) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377727326_Discontinued_reasons_of_journals_in_SCOPUS_analysis_and_reflections?enrichId=rgreq-3545ee0db7d9f06d060445d5327f9219-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzM3NzcyNzMyNjtBUzoxMTQzMTI4MTIyMDIzODc5NkAxNzA2MzI0NjAxNDg1&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf

scopus.com (Global: 6,900^th place; English: 4,763^rd place)

"Sources". Scopus. Archived from the original on 27 December 2016. Retrieved 26 June 2018.

scopusfeedback.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

orcid.scopusfeedback.com

"Scopus2Orcid". Scopus. Archived from the original on 24 July 2014. Retrieved 7 May 2014.

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15^th place; English: 8^th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

Echchakoui, Saïd (2020). "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: The case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019". Journal of Marketing Analytics. 8 (3): 165–184. doi:10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9. S2CID 256510471. Archived from the original on 18 May 2023. Retrieved 18 May 2023.
Singh Chawla, Dalmeet (8 February 2021). "Hundreds of 'predatory' journals indexed on leading scholarly database". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00239-0. PMID 33558751. S2CID 231871351.

springer.com (Global: 182^nd place; English: 172^nd place)

link.springer.com

Echchakoui, Saïd (2020). "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: The case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019". Journal of Marketing Analytics. 8 (3): 165–184. doi:10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9. S2CID 256510471. Archived from the original on 18 May 2023. Retrieved 18 May 2023.

theguardian.com (Global: 16^th place; English: 11^th place)

"Elsevier are corrupting open science in Europe". TheGuardian.com. 29 June 2018. Archived from the original on 5 January 2021. Retrieved 14 August 2021.

usf.edu (Global: 3,578^th place; English: 2,097^th place)

guides.lib.usf.edu

"Patents and Trademarks | Library databases that contain Patents". University of South Florida. 14 February 2025. Retrieved 14 February 2025.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

Echchakoui, Saïd (2020). "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: The case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019". Journal of Marketing Analytics. 8 (3): 165–184. doi:10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9. S2CID 256510471. Archived from the original on 18 May 2023. Retrieved 18 May 2023.
"Sources". Scopus. Archived from the original on 27 December 2016. Retrieved 26 June 2018.
"Scopus2Orcid". Scopus. Archived from the original on 24 July 2014. Retrieved 7 May 2014.
"Scopus Content Overview: Content Policy and Selection". Scopus Info. Elsevier. Archived from the original on 24 April 2015. Retrieved 4 September 2013.
"Elsevier are corrupting open science in Europe". TheGuardian.com. 29 June 2018. Archived from the original on 5 January 2021. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
"extlistJune2021". Archived from the original on 21 July 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
"The importance of high-quality content: curation and reevaluation in Scopus" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
"IDEA Study 2 2017 Predatory journals in Scopus". idea-en.cerge-ei.cz. Archived from the original on 27 July 2021. Retrieved 14 August 2021.

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; English: 4^th place)

search.worldcat.org

Goodman, David; Deis, Louise (January 2005). "Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus". The Charleston Advisor. 6 (3). Annual Reviews: 5–21. eISSN 1525-4003. ISSN 1525-4011. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
Huang, Ying; Li, Ruinan; Zhang, Lin; Sivertsen, Gunnar (8 April 2021). Yang, Liying (ed.). "A comprehensive analysis of the journal evaluation system in China". Quantitative Science Studies. 2 (1). The MIT Press: 300–326. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00103. eISSN 2641-3337. hdl:11250/2733769. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
Burnham, Judy F. (8 March 2006). "Scopus database: a review". Biomedical Digital Libraries. 3 (1) 1. BioMed Central. doi:10.1186/1742-5581-3-1. ISSN 1742-5581. PMC 1420322. PMID 16522216.
Tarazi, Alaa (1 June 2024). "Comparative Analysis of the Bibliographic Data Sources Using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Lens: Comparative Analysis of Bibliographic Data Sources". High Yield Medical Reviews. 2 (1). High Yield Medicine. doi:10.59707/hymrUNHW4628. ISSN 2960-1630. Retrieved 29 May 2025.
Ortega, José Luis; Delgado‑Quirós, Lorena (28 June 2024). "The indexation of retracted literature in seven principal scholarly databases: a coverage comparison of dimensions, OpenAlex, PubMed, Scilit, Scopus, The Lens and Web of Science". Scientometrics. 129 (7). Springer Nature: 3769–3785. doi:10.1007/s11192-024-05034-y. eISSN 1588-2861. hdl:10261/382751. ISSN 0138-9130.
Yin, Min; Zhao, Chenpei; You, Jia; Ding, Wenzhi; Jiang, Dongdong; Tian, Yuyin; Shi, Lin; Leng, Lin (14 February 2025). Berry, Simon (ed.). "Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of the Status of Scleral Lens Research Based on the Web of Science Database and Scopus Database (2014-2024)". Clinical Optometry. 17. Dove Medical Press: 47–60. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S495970. ISSN 1179-2752. PMC 11834708. PMID 39967862.
Tennant, Jonathan P. (27 October 2020). "Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge". European Science Editing. 46 e51987. doi:10.3897/ese.2020.e51987. ISSN 2518-3354.

Scopus (English Wikipedia)

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14th place; English: 9th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

arphahub.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

ese.arphahub.com

cerge-ei.cz (Global: low place; English: low place)

idea-en.cerge-ei.cz

ctfassets.net (Global: 5,605th place; English: 5,753rd place)

assets.ctfassets.net

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

elsevier.com (Global: 365th place; English: 372nd place)

elsevier.com

service.elsevier.com

hdl.handle.net (Global: 66th place; English: 34th place)

highyieldmed.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

hymr.highyieldmed.org

indexhub.info (Global: low place; English: low place)

ingentaconnect.com (Global: 3,367th place; English: 3,282nd place)

annurev.publisher.ingentaconnect.com

insidehighered.com (Global: 4,021st place; English: 2,075th place)

mit.edu (Global: 476th place; English: 340th place)

direct.mit.edu

nih.gov (Global: 5th place; English: 5th place)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

researchgate.net (Global: 96th place; English: 89th place)

scopus.com (Global: 6,900th place; English: 4,763rd place)

scopusfeedback.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

orcid.scopusfeedback.com

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

springer.com (Global: 182nd place; English: 172nd place)

link.springer.com

theguardian.com (Global: 16th place; English: 11th place)

usf.edu (Global: 3,578th place; English: 2,097th place)

guides.lib.usf.edu

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; English: 4th place)

search.worldcat.org

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14^th place; English: 9^th place)

ctfassets.net (Global: 5,605^th place; English: 5,753^rd place)

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

elsevier.com (Global: 365^th place; English: 372^nd place)

hdl.handle.net (Global: 66^th place; English: 34^th place)

ingentaconnect.com (Global: 3,367^th place; English: 3,282^nd place)

insidehighered.com (Global: 4,021^st place; English: 2,075^th place)

mit.edu (Global: 476^th place; English: 340^th place)

nih.gov (Global: 5^th place; English: 5^th place)

researchgate.net (Global: 96^th place; English: 89^th place)

scopus.com (Global: 6,900^th place; English: 4,763^rd place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15^th place; English: 8^th place)

springer.com (Global: 182^nd place; English: 172^nd place)

theguardian.com (Global: 16^th place; English: 11^th place)

usf.edu (Global: 3,578^th place; English: 2,097^th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; English: 4^th place)