Scopus (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Scopus" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

10web.archive.org

1^st place

7doi.org

2^nd place

7nih.gov

4^th place

4elsevier.com

610^th place

704^th place

2semanticscholar.org

11^th place

8^th place

1ingentaconnect.com

3,306^th place

3,189^th place

1sjtu.edu.cn

low place

1mit.edu

415^th place

327^th place

1springer.com

274^th place

309^th place

1scopus.com

low place

1scopusfeedback.com

low place

1harvard.edu

18^th place

17^th place

1theguardian.com

12^th place

11^th place

1researchgate.net

120^th place

125^th place

1cerge-ei.cz

low place

1arphahub.com

low place

1worldcat.org

5^th place

1insidehighered.com

4,161^st place

2,305^th place

1scholarlycritic.com

low place

1cnrs.fr

2,402^nd place

5,549^th place

arphahub.com

ese.arphahub.com

Tennant, Jonathan P. (27 October 2020). "Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge". European Science Editing. 46: e51987. doi:10.3897/ese.2020.e51987. ISSN 2518-3354.

cerge-ei.cz

idea-en.cerge-ei.cz

"IDEA Study 2 2017 Predatory journals in Scopus". idea-en.cerge-ei.cz. Archived from the original on 27 July 2021. Retrieved 14 August 2021.

cnrs.fr

"The CNRS has unsubscribed from the Scopus publications database | CNRS". 11 January 2024.

doi.org

Kulkarni, A. V.; Aziz, B.; Shams, I.; Busse, J. W. (2009). "Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals". JAMA. 302 (10): 1092–6. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1307. PMID 19738094.
Burnham, JF (2006). "Scopus database: A review". Biomedical Digital Libraries. 3: 1. doi:10.1186/1742-5581-3-1. PMC 1420322. PMID 16522216.
Echchakoui, Saïd (2020). "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: The case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019". Journal of Marketing Analytics. 8 (3): 165–184. doi:10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9. S2CID 256510471. Archived from the original on 18 May 2023. Retrieved 18 May 2023.
Brembs, Björn (2018). "Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 12: 37. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037. PMC 5826185. PMID 29515380.
Else, Holly (15 August 2018). "How Unpaywall is transforming open science". Nature. 560 (7718): 290–291. Bibcode:2018Natur.560..290E. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05968-3. PMID 30111793.
Singh Chawla, Dalmeet (8 February 2021). "Hundreds of 'predatory' journals indexed on leading scholarly database". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00239-0. PMID 33558751. S2CID 231871351.
Tennant, Jonathan P. (27 October 2020). "Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge". European Science Editing. 46: e51987. doi:10.3897/ese.2020.e51987. ISSN 2518-3354.

elsevier.com

"Scopus Content Overview: Content Policy and Selection". Scopus Info. Elsevier. Archived from the original on 24 April 2015. Retrieved 4 September 2013.
"extlistJune2021". Archived from the original on 21 July 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
"The importance of high-quality content: curation and reevaluation in Scopus" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.

service.elsevier.com

"How are CiteScore metrics used in Scopus?". Scopus: Access and use Support Center. 29 July 2022. Retrieved 24 May 2023.

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

Else, Holly (15 August 2018). "How Unpaywall is transforming open science". Nature. 560 (7718): 290–291. Bibcode:2018Natur.560..290E. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05968-3. PMID 30111793.

ingentaconnect.com

Goodman, David; Deis, Louise (1 January 2005). "Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus". The Charleston Advisor. 6 (3): 5–21. Archived from the original on 12 August 2023. Retrieved 12 August 2023.

insidehighered.com

Straumsheim, Carl. "How to Measure Impact". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 13 August 2023.

mit.edu

direct.mit.edu

[1] Archived 2 July 2022 at the Wayback Machine; [2] Archived 19 May 2023 at the Wayback Machine

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Kulkarni, A. V.; Aziz, B.; Shams, I.; Busse, J. W. (2009). "Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals". JAMA. 302 (10): 1092–6. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1307. PMID 19738094.
Burnham, JF (2006). "Scopus database: A review". Biomedical Digital Libraries. 3: 1. doi:10.1186/1742-5581-3-1. PMC 1420322. PMID 16522216.
Brembs, Björn (2018). "Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 12: 37. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037. PMC 5826185. PMID 29515380.
Else, Holly (15 August 2018). "How Unpaywall is transforming open science". Nature. 560 (7718): 290–291. Bibcode:2018Natur.560..290E. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05968-3. PMID 30111793.
Singh Chawla, Dalmeet (8 February 2021). "Hundreds of 'predatory' journals indexed on leading scholarly database". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00239-0. PMID 33558751. S2CID 231871351.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Burnham, JF (2006). "Scopus database: A review". Biomedical Digital Libraries. 3: 1. doi:10.1186/1742-5581-3-1. PMC 1420322. PMID 16522216.
Brembs, Björn (2018). "Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 12: 37. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037. PMC 5826185. PMID 29515380.

researchgate.net

Wilches-Visbal JH, Pérez-Anaya O, Castillo-Pedraza MC. DISCONTINUED REASONS OF JOURNALS IN SCOPUS: ANALYSIS AND REFLECTIONS. Bibl, An Investig. 2024;20(1) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377727326_Discontinued_reasons_of_journals_in_SCOPUS_analysis_and_reflections?enrichId=rgreq-3545ee0db7d9f06d060445d5327f9219-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzM3NzcyNzMyNjtBUzoxMTQzMTI4MTIyMDIzODc5NkAxNzA2MzI0NjAxNDg1&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf

scholarlycritic.com

"Elsevier Unethically Promotes its Journals via Scopus: The Case of Heliyon". Scholarly Criticism Articles. Scholarly Criticism: A Watchdog on published Business Research. Retrieved 23 April 2024.

scopus.com

"Sources". Scopus. Archived from the original on 27 December 2016. Retrieved 26 June 2018.

scopusfeedback.com

orcid.scopusfeedback.com

"Scopus2Orcid". Scopus. Archived from the original on 24 July 2014. Retrieved 7 May 2014.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Echchakoui, Saïd (2020). "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: The case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019". Journal of Marketing Analytics. 8 (3): 165–184. doi:10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9. S2CID 256510471. Archived from the original on 18 May 2023. Retrieved 18 May 2023.
Singh Chawla, Dalmeet (8 February 2021). "Hundreds of 'predatory' journals indexed on leading scholarly database". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00239-0. PMID 33558751. S2CID 231871351.

sjtu.edu.cn

en.gs.sjtu.edu.cn

[1] Archived 2 July 2022 at the Wayback Machine; [2] Archived 19 May 2023 at the Wayback Machine

springer.com

link.springer.com

Echchakoui, Saïd (2020). "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: The case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019". Journal of Marketing Analytics. 8 (3): 165–184. doi:10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9. S2CID 256510471. Archived from the original on 18 May 2023. Retrieved 18 May 2023.

theguardian.com

"Elsevier are corrupting open science in Europe". TheGuardian.com. 29 June 2018. Archived from the original on 5 January 2021. Retrieved 14 August 2021.

web.archive.org

Goodman, David; Deis, Louise (1 January 2005). "Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus". The Charleston Advisor. 6 (3): 5–21. Archived from the original on 12 August 2023. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
[1] Archived 2 July 2022 at the Wayback Machine; [2] Archived 19 May 2023 at the Wayback Machine
Echchakoui, Saïd (2020). "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: The case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019". Journal of Marketing Analytics. 8 (3): 165–184. doi:10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9. S2CID 256510471. Archived from the original on 18 May 2023. Retrieved 18 May 2023.
"Sources". Scopus. Archived from the original on 27 December 2016. Retrieved 26 June 2018.
"Scopus2Orcid". Scopus. Archived from the original on 24 July 2014. Retrieved 7 May 2014.
"Scopus Content Overview: Content Policy and Selection". Scopus Info. Elsevier. Archived from the original on 24 April 2015. Retrieved 4 September 2013.
"Elsevier are corrupting open science in Europe". TheGuardian.com. 29 June 2018. Archived from the original on 5 January 2021. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
"extlistJune2021". Archived from the original on 21 July 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
"The importance of high-quality content: curation and reevaluation in Scopus" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
"IDEA Study 2 2017 Predatory journals in Scopus". idea-en.cerge-ei.cz. Archived from the original on 27 July 2021. Retrieved 14 August 2021.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Tennant, Jonathan P. (27 October 2020). "Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge". European Science Editing. 46: e51987. doi:10.3897/ese.2020.e51987. ISSN 2518-3354.