Self-incrimination (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Self-incrimination" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

3worldcat.org

5^th place

2fas.org

505^th place

410^th place

2legalserviceindia.com

low place

2justia.com

696^th place

428^th place

1alrc.gov.au

low place

1loc.gov

70^th place

63^rd place

1businessinsider.in

2,666^th place

1,519^th place

1hrw.org

729^th place

650^th place

1findlaw.com

1,478^th place

868^th place

1uchicago.edu

230^th place

214^th place

1legislation.gov.uk

809^th place

536^th place

1mygov.scot

low place

1constitutioncenter.org

6,211^th place

3,772^nd place

1oyez.org

8,598^th place

4,874^th place

1pbs.org

198^th place

154^th place

1cornell.edu

332^nd place

246^th place

1law.com

3,163^rd place

1,731^st place

alrc.gov.au

"Privilege Against Self-Incrimination". Traditional Rights and Freedoms—Encroachments by Commonwealth Laws (ALRC Report 129). Australian Law Reform Commission. 1 March 2016. Retrieved 14 August 2024.

businessinsider.in

Jacobs, Harrison (November 13, 2015). "Report: Torture is routinely used in China to obtain confessions and silence human-rights lawyers". Retrieved November 2, 2018. {{cite magazine}}: Cite magazine requires |magazine= (help)

constitutioncenter.org

"The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution". National Constitution Center – The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Retrieved 2018-02-28.

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

Cornell University Law School. "Syllabus SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 384 U.S. 436 Miranda v. Arizona CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA".

fas.org

Aftergood, Steven. "The Right to Remain Silent Around the World". Federation of American Scientists.
"Miranda Warning Equivalents" (PDF). Federation of American Scientists. The Law Library of Congress. Retrieved 24 March 2018.

findlaw.com

criminal.findlaw.com

"Invoking the Right to Remain Silent". Findlaw. Retrieved 2018-04-06.

hrw.org

"China: Ratify Key International Human Rights Treaty". Human Rights Watch. 2013-10-08. Retrieved 2018-04-13.

justia.com

supreme.justia.com

Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49 (1949)

law.justia.com

"U.S. v. Fiseku, No. 17-1222 (2d Cir. 2018)". JUSTIA- US Law. Retrieved April 19, 2019.

law.com

Flumenbaum, Martin; Karp, Brian S. "Court Shifts on Effect of Using Handcuffs During Police Encounters". The New York Law Journal. Retrieved March 28, 2019.

legalserviceindia.com

aDvantage. "Privilege Against Self - Incrimination". www.legalserviceindia.com. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
Khare, Harshit. "Privilege Against Self-Incrimination". Legal Service India. Retrieved 26 March 2018.

legislation.gov.uk

"Criminal Evidence Act 1898". The National Archives.

loc.gov

China: Amendment of Criminal Procedure Law.

mygov.scot

"Being arrested: your rights". mygov.scot. Retrieved 24 March 2018.

oyez.org

Illinois Institute of Technology (July 22, 2013). "MIRANDA v. ARIZONA". oyez.org.

pbs.org

Alex McBride (December 2006). "SUPREME COURT HISTORY EXPANDING CIVIL RIGHTS Miranda v. Arizona (1966)". pbs.org.

uchicago.edu

chicagounbound.uchicago.edu

Helmholz, Richard H. (1990). "Origins of the Privilege against Self-Incrimination: The Role of the European Ius Commune". New York University Law Review. 65: 962–990.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Siegel, Larry J. (2017). Essentials of criminal justice. Worrall, John L. (Tenth ed.). Australia. ISBN 978-1305633766. OCLC 960166637.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Luban, David; O'Sullivan, Julie R.; Stewart, David P. (2010). International and transnational criminal law. New York: Aspen Publishers. ISBN 978-0735562141. OCLC 455870865.
Values of our times : contemporary axiological research in China. Li, Deshun. Berlin: Springer. 2013. ISBN 978-3642382581. OCLC 847517553.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)