Set theory (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Set theory" in English language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
194th place
182nd place
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
6th place
6th place
4th place
4th place
15th place
8th place
209th place
151st place
2,089th place
1,141st place
434th place
249th place
5th place
5th place
4,781st place
3,117th place
560th place
313th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
37th place
64th place
569th place
354th place
4,683rd place
3,565th place
182nd place
172nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
84th place
63rd place

ams.org (Global: 434th place; English: 249th place)

mathscinet.ams.org

  • Mendelson, Elliott (1973), Number Systems and the Foundations of Analysis, Academic Press, MR 0357694, Zbl 0268.26001

ams.org

archive.org (Global: 6th place; English: 6th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

britannica.com (Global: 37th place; English: 64th place)

cam.ac.uk (Global: 569th place; English: 354th place)

dpmms.cam.ac.uk

cambridge.org (Global: 209th place; English: 151st place)

digizeitschriften.de (Global: low place; English: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

homotopytypetheory.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

jhu.edu (Global: 560th place; English: 313th place)

cs.jhu.edu

libretexts.org (Global: 4,683rd place; English: 3,565th place)

math.libretexts.org

mathsisfun.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

ncatlab.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

nih.gov (Global: 5th place; English: 5th place)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

projecteuclid.org (Global: 4,781st place; English: 3,117th place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

springer.com (Global: 182nd place; English: 172nd place)

link.springer.com

stanford.edu (Global: 194th place; English: 182nd place)

plato.stanford.edu

  • Bagaria, Joan (January 31, 2023) [October 8, 2014], Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.), "Set Theory", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved May 9, 2026
  • Ferreirós, José (December 3, 2025) [April 10, 2007], Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.), "The Early Development of Set Theory", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved May 9, 2026
  • Ferreirós, José (2024), "The Early Development of Set Theory", in Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2024 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2025-01-04{{citation}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  • Bagaria, Joan (2020), "Set Theory", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2020-08-20
  • Marquis, Jean-Pierre (August 29, 2019) [First published December 6, 1996], Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.), "Category Theory", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved May 9, 2026
  • Rodych, Victor (Jan 31, 2018), "Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 ed.), ISSN 1095-5054, OCLC 429049174
  • Rodych 2018, §2.1: "When we prove a theorem or decide a proposition, we operate in a purely formal, syntactical manner. In doing mathematics, we do not discover pre-existing truths that were 'already there without one knowing' (PG 481)—we invent mathematics, bit-by-little-bit." Note, however, that Wittgenstein does not identify such deduction with philosophical logic; cf. Rodych §1, paras. 7-12.
  • Rodych 2018, §3.4: "Given that mathematics is a 'motley of techniques of proof' (RFM III, §46), it does not require a foundation (RFM VII, §16) and it cannot be given a self-evident foundation (PR §160; WVC 34 & 62; RFM IV, §3). Since set theory was invented to provide mathematics with a foundation, it is, minimally, unnecessary."
  • Rodych 2018, §2.2: "An expression quantifying over an infinite domain is never a meaningful proposition, not even when we have proved, for instance, that a particular number n has a particular property."
  • Rodych 2018, §3.6.

web.stanford.edu

time.com (Global: 84th place; English: 63rd place)

  • Taylor, Melissa August, Harriet Barovick, Michelle Derrow, Tam Gray, Daniel S. Levy, Lina Lofaro, David Spitz, Joel Stein and Chris (14 June 1999), "The 100 Worst Ideas Of The Century", TIME, archived from the original on 12 April 2025, retrieved 12 April 2025{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; English: 4th place)

search.worldcat.org

zbmath.org (Global: 2,089th place; English: 1,141st place)