Shadow banning (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Shadow banning" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
175th place
137th place
2nd place
2nd place
1st place
1st place
187th place
146th place
5th place
5th place
7th place
7th place
7,153rd place
4,975th place
193rd place
152nd place
3rd place
3rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
114th place
90th place
low place
9,245th place
1,082nd place
764th place
20th place
30th place
11th place
8th place
34th place
27th place
599th place
369th place
low place
low place
3,475th place
2,144th place
4,141st place
2,523rd place
4,734th place
3,077th place
low place
7,009th place
484th place
323rd place
54th place
48th place
1,368th place
793rd place
346th place
229th place
12th place
11th place
466th place
349th place
low place
6,277th place
23rd place
32nd place
low place
low place
69th place
59th place
228th place
158th place
476th place
282nd place
259th place
188th place
474th place
329th place
210th place
157th place

arxiv.org

  • Le Merrer, Erwan; Morgan, Benoit; Trédan, Gilles (2020-12-09). "Setting the Record Straighter on Shadow Banning". arXiv:2012.05101 [cs.SI].

bbc.com

boingboing.net

books.google.com

  • Robert Walsh (12 January 2006). Micro-ISV: From Vision to Reality. Apress. p. 183. ISBN 978-1-4302-0114-4. So one of the things we did in FogBugz to solve the problem of how do you get the person to go away and leave you alone is, well, you take their post and make it invisible to everyone else, but they still see it. They won't know they've been deleted. There's no one fanning their flame. You can't get into a flame war if no one responds to your criticism. So they get silenced and eventually just go away. We have several ways of telling if they come back, and it's been proven to be extremely, extremely effective. Say a spammer posts to your board and then they come back to check if it's still there, and they see it—to them it's still there—but no one else sees it, so they're not bothered by it.

buzzfeednews.com

cdt.org

chron.com

smallbusiness.chron.com

citadel.org

citizenlab.org

codinghorror.com

doi.org

  • Leerssen, Paddy. "An End to Shadow Banning? Transparency rights in the Digital Services Act between content moderation and curation". osf.io: 3. doi:10.31219/osf.io/7jg45. Retrieved 2022-12-11.
  • Tanash, Rima S.; Chen, Zhouhan; Thakur, Tanmay; Wallach, Dan S.; Subramanian, Devika (1 January 2015). "Known Unknowns". Proceedings of the 14th ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. WPES '15. New York, NY, USA: ACM. pp. 11–20. doi:10.1145/2808138.2808147. ISBN 9781450338202. S2CID 207229086.

engadget.com

forbes.com

ft.com

gizmodo.com

lifehacker.com

mic.com

niemanlab.org

nymag.com

nytimes.com

osf.io

  • Leerssen, Paddy. "An End to Shadow Banning? Transparency rights in the Digital Services Act between content moderation and curation". osf.io: 3. doi:10.31219/osf.io/7jg45. Retrieved 2022-12-11.

pando.com

petapixel.com

reddit.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

  • Tanash, Rima S.; Chen, Zhouhan; Thakur, Tanmay; Wallach, Dan S.; Subramanian, Devika (1 January 2015). "Known Unknowns". Proceedings of the 14th ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. WPES '15. New York, NY, USA: ACM. pp. 11–20. doi:10.1145/2808138.2808147. ISBN 9781450338202. S2CID 207229086.

slate.com

techcrunch.com

theatlantic.com

theguardian.com

thehill.com

theverge.com

twitter.com

blog.twitter.com

vice.com

motherboard.vice.com

news.vice.com

vice.com

vox.com

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

wired.com

archive.wired.com

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org