Software patent (English Wikipedia)

Patents Act 1990 (Cth) s 18 Patentable inventions
National Research Development Corp v Commissioner of Patents [1959] HCA 67, (1959) 102 CLR 252, High Court (Australia).
International Business Machines Corp v Commissioner of Patents [1991] FCA 811, 105 ALR 388, Federal Court (Australia).
CCOM Pty Ltd v Jie-jing Pty Ltd [1994] FCA 396, (1994) 51 FCR 260, Federal Court (Full Court) (Australia).
Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCAFC 150 (10 November 2014), Federal Court (Full Court) (Australia).
Commissioner of Patents v RPL Central Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 177 (11 December 2015), Federal Court (Full Court) (Australia).

autm.net

FY 2004 U.S. Licensing Survey, Association of University Technology Managers, 2012-09-08, archived from the original on 2012-10-15, retrieved 2012-11-07

barandbench.com

Aditi, Singh (29 December 2019). "A computer program which makes 'technical contribution' patentable, not hit by Sec 3(k) of Patents Act". Bar and Bench. Retrieved 13 February 2020.

beehive.govt.nz

"Minister announces way forward for software patents". beehive.govt.nz. 2010-07-15. Archived from the original on 2010-09-20. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
Varghese, Sam (16 July 2010). "New Zealand says no to software patents". Government Tech Policy. Archived from the original on 16 January 2013. Retrieved 7 November 2012.
"South Pacific cousins part ways over patents". Cpaglobal.com. 2010-07-28. Archived from the original on 2012-08-26. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
"New Zealand bans software patents". TG Daily. 2010-07-15. Archived from the original on 2012-04-06. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
Fairfax Media Business Group (2010-04-15). "NZICT says patents 'integral' to software protection | Computerworld New Zealand". Computerworld.co.nz. Archived from the original on 2013-01-15. Retrieved 2012-10-09. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)

buchhandel.de

Hoffmann, Marcus (2008). Mehrfachschutz geistigen Eigentums im deutschen Rechtssystem [Multiple protection of intellectual property in the German legal system]. ISBN 978-3-8316-0806-5.

business.qld.gov.au

Employment, Small Business and Training (2010-12-03). "Home". www.business.qld.gov.au. Retrieved 2020-04-11. {{cite web}}: |first= has generic name (help)

businessreviewonline.com

"Microsoft's developer patent pledge 'worse than useless' says SFLC". November 10, 2006.

cipc.co.za

Patents Act, No. 57 of 1978, as amended (PDF), 26 April 1978, archived from the original (PDF) on 12 December 2011, retrieved 25 September 2011
Patents Act, No. 57 of 1978, as amended Section 25(3) (PDF), 26 April 1978, archived from the original (PDF) on 12 December 2011, retrieved 25 September 2011

cnet.com

news.cnet.com

Lombardi, Candace (November 27, 2006), "Microsoft lost in translation", News Blog, CNET, retrieved October 29, 2008

computerworld.co.nz

"Minister announces way forward for software patents". beehive.govt.nz. 2010-07-15. Archived from the original on 2010-09-20. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
Varghese, Sam (16 July 2010). "New Zealand says no to software patents". Government Tech Policy. Archived from the original on 16 January 2013. Retrieved 7 November 2012.
"South Pacific cousins part ways over patents". Cpaglobal.com. 2010-07-28. Archived from the original on 2012-08-26. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
"New Zealand bans software patents". TG Daily. 2010-07-15. Archived from the original on 2012-04-06. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
Fairfax Media Business Group (2010-04-15). "NZICT says patents 'integral' to software protection | Computerworld New Zealand". Computerworld.co.nz. Archived from the original on 2013-01-15. Retrieved 2012-10-09. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)

computerworld.com

Martin Goetz, "Unsung innovators: Marty Goetz, holder of first [US] software patent". Computerworld. 1968.
Eric Lai; Sumner Lemon (2007-05-13). "Update: Microsoft wants royalties for open-source software". Computerworld. Retrieved 2012-10-09.

cornell.edu

copyright.cornell.edu

Peter B. Hirtle, Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States, 1 January 2007. Archived July 4, 2012, at the Wayback Machine

cpaglobal.com

"Minister announces way forward for software patents". beehive.govt.nz. 2010-07-15. Archived from the original on 2010-09-20. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
Varghese, Sam (16 July 2010). "New Zealand says no to software patents". Government Tech Policy. Archived from the original on 16 January 2013. Retrieved 7 November 2012.
"South Pacific cousins part ways over patents". Cpaglobal.com. 2010-07-28. Archived from the original on 2012-08-26. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
"New Zealand bans software patents". TG Daily. 2010-07-15. Archived from the original on 2012-04-06. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
Fairfax Media Business Group (2010-04-15). "NZICT says patents 'integral' to software protection | Computerworld New Zealand". Computerworld.co.nz. Archived from the original on 2013-01-15. Retrieved 2012-10-09. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)

doi.org

Burk, Dan L. (February 2001). "Copyrightable functions and patentable speech". Communications of the ACM. 44 (2). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM): 69–75. doi:10.1145/359205.359231. S2CID 10784660.
Kiesewetter-Köbinger, Swen (2010). "Programmers' Capital". Computer. 43 (2): 106–108. doi:10.1109/MC.2010.47.

duke.edu

scholarship.law.duke.edu

"SOFTWARE PATENT LAW: UNITED STATES AND EUROPE COMPARED". Duke Law. Retrieved 19 October 2021.

endsoftpatents.org

"End Software Patents".
"Europe's "unitary patent" could mean unlimited software patents".
"EU unitary patent and Unified Patent Court".

epo.org

DECISION of 24 February 2006, Case Number: T 0469/03 – 3.5.01, European Patent Office, Boards of Appeal, 24 February 2006, pp. Reasons 5.1 to 5.3
Guidelines for Examination in the EPO, section g-vii, 5.4
FAQ – Korea, European Patent Office, archived from the original on 13 September 2009, retrieved 29 October 2008
"Reasons, point 3.4", Decision T 0059/93 () of 20 April 1994, European Patent Office, Boards of Appeal, 20 April 1994
"Reasons 2.4", Decision T 1173/97 (Computer program product/IBM) of 1.7.1998, European Patent Office, Boards of Appeal, 1 July 1998
Decision T 0424/03 (Clipboard formats I/MICROSOFT) of 23.2.2006, European Patent Office Boards of Appeal, 23 February 2006

new.epo.org

espacenet.com

worldwide.espacenet.com

GB 1039141, "A computer arranged for the automatic solution of linear programming problems by British Petroleum, Patrick Vincent Slee and Pauline Margaret Joyce Harris"

europa.eu

ec.europa.eu

Max-Planck-Institut (20 December 2000), Stellungnahme zum Sondierungspapier der Kommission der Europaischen Gemeinschaften: Die Patentierbarkeit Computer-implementierter Erfindungen [Opinion on the consultation paper by the Commission of the European Communities: The patentability of computer-implemented inventions] (PDF)

europarl.eu.int

Amendment 23 to the proposed Directive on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions (PDF), European Parliament, September 2003, archived from the original (PDF) on February 10, 2006
Dispositions program decision, Bundesgerichtshof (, BGH, Federal Court of Justice of Germany), 1976-06-22

ffii.org

swpat.ffii.org

"Effects". Patentability and Democracy in Europe. Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure. Archived from the original on February 10, 2007.

financialexpress.com

"Software patents under Ordinance face reversal". Financialexpress.com. 2005-03-29. Retrieved 2012-10-09.

findlaw.com

caselaw.findlaw.com

Diamond v. Diehr, 49 U.S. 1112 (SCOTUS 1981) (""... insignificant postsolution activity will not transform an unpatentable principle into a patentable process."").

gnu.org

"End Software Patents".
"Europe's "unitary patent" could mean unlimited software patents".
"EU unitary patent and Unified Patent Court".
"Software patents that hurt free software". Free Software Foundation. Retrieved 2012-10-09.

hki.co.id

"Regulations under the Patent Cooperation Treaty" (PDF). WIPO. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-02-28. Retrieved 2020-04-12.

hoovers.com

premium.hoovers.com

Acacia Technologies LLC: Company Information, Hoovers^{[dead link‍]}

ic.gc.ca

cipo.ic.gc.ca

Examination Practice Respecting Computer-Implemented Inventions – PN 2013-03, Canadian Intellectual Property Office, March 8, 2013

idg.com.au

arn.idg.com.au

"Microsoft, Autodesk in patent licensing deal". IDG News Service. 2004-12-17. Archived from the original on January 15, 2013. Retrieved 2012-10-09.

ip-watch.org

Ermert, Monika (22 April 2013). "German Parliament Sends Message: Stop Granting Software Patents". Intellectual Property Watch. Retrieved April 29, 2013.

ipindia.nic.in

"Guidelines for Examination of Computer Related Inventions (CRIs)" (PDF). www.ipindia.nic.in.

ipo.gov.uk

"Public consultation on level of the inventive step required for obtaining patents" (PDF). UK Intellectual Property Office. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-01-04. Retrieved 2007-06-05.

itwire.com

"Minister announces way forward for software patents". beehive.govt.nz. 2010-07-15. Archived from the original on 2010-09-20. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
Varghese, Sam (16 July 2010). "New Zealand says no to software patents". Government Tech Policy. Archived from the original on 16 January 2013. Retrieved 7 November 2012.
"South Pacific cousins part ways over patents". Cpaglobal.com. 2010-07-28. Archived from the original on 2012-08-26. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
"New Zealand bans software patents". TG Daily. 2010-07-15. Archived from the original on 2012-04-06. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
Fairfax Media Business Group (2010-04-15). "NZICT says patents 'integral' to software protection | Computerworld New Zealand". Computerworld.co.nz. Archived from the original on 2013-01-15. Retrieved 2012-10-09. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)

jpo.go.jp

"Examination Guidelines for Patent and Utility Model in Japan (REQUIREMENTS FOR PATENTABILITY)" (PDF). jpo.go.jp. pp. 1–3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-03-23. Retrieved 2009-11-21.
Examination Guidelines for Inventions for Specific Fields (Computer Software-Related Inventions) in Japan (PDF), Japanese Patent Office, April 2005, p. 10 (2.2.1), archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-03-23, retrieved 2009-11-21
Examination Guidelines for Inventions for Specific Fields (Computer Software-Related Inventions) in Japan (PDF), Japanese Patent Office, April 2005, pp. 16–17 ("Systematization of human transactions"), archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-03-23, retrieved 2009-11-21

justia.com

supreme.justia.com

Gottschalk v Benson, 409 U.S. 63 (1972)
Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981)

legislation.govt.nz

"Patents Act 2013, section 11 'Computer programs'". 2020-08-07. Retrieved 2022-01-25.

managingip.com

"The India Patents Act, 1970 and Software Patentability" (PDF). www.managingip.com. 7 March 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-04-17. Retrieved 2020-03-27.

microsoft.com

"Silverlight Controls License". Microsoft Corporation.
"Community Commitments – Microsoft & Novell Interoperability Collaboration". Microsoft. November 2, 2006.
"Microsoft and LG Sign Patent Agreement Covering Android and Chrome OS Based Devices". Microsoft. 2012-01-12. Retrieved 2012-10-09.

miplc.de

Laub, Christoph (2005) [Academic Year 2004/2005]. International Software Patent Filing: The Problem of Statutory Subject Matter in view of Legal Standards at the EPO-USPTO and Economic Implications (PDF) (Master's). Munich Intellectual Property Law Center. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 21, 2007. Retrieved 21 March 2006.

mises.org

"An Economic Review of the Patent System (1958)" (PDF). 20 July 2005. Retrieved 2012-10-09.

mondaq.com

Bro, Sarah (September 6, 2018). "Copyright in Data Compilations is Thin". Mondaq Business Briefing. Retrieved January 25, 2019.

novell.com

"Patent Policy". Novell. Archived from the original on 2013-07-30. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
"Microsoft and Novell Announce Broad Collaboration on Windows and Linux Interoperability and Support" (Press release). Novell. November 2, 2006.

out-law.com

Gray, John (2004-08-19), Software patents in Europe: debunking the myths, OUT-LAW News

patenthawk.com

"Patent Economics: Part 4 – Incentives" (blog entry). Patenthawk. 2005-04-17. Archived from the original on 2012-09-06. Retrieved 2012-10-09.

patents.google.com

U.S. patent 3,552,738, U.S. patent 3,553,358 and U.S. patent 3,553,384 granted 5 January 1971, and U.S. patent 3,996,564 granted December 7, 1976, can be easily found using the Bessen/Hunt technique. Earlier patents may exist but US patent database does not permit full text searching for earlier patents

redhat.com

"Red Hat Patent Policy". Red Hat.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Burk, Dan L. (February 2001). "Copyrightable functions and patentable speech". Communications of the ACM. 44 (2). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM): 69–75. doi:10.1145/359205.359231. S2CID 10784660.

slashdot.org

Miller, Robin ("Roblimo") (August 31, 1999). "Unisys Not Suing (most) Webmasters for Using GIFs". Slashdot.

softwarefreedom.org

"Microsoft's Open Specification Promise: No Assurance for GPL". Software Freedom Law Center.

sourceforge.net

"symbian-dump". SourceForge. 11 April 2013.

sun.com

java.sun.com

"Oracle Technology Network for Java Developers". Sun Microsystems. Retrieved 2012-10-09.

sun.com

"Sun Grants Global Open Source Community Access to More than 1,600 Patents" (Press release). Sun Microsystems. January 25, 2005. Archived from the original on December 2, 2008.

swpat.org

en.swpat.org

"End Software Patents".
"Europe's "unitary patent" could mean unlimited software patents".
"EU unitary patent and Unified Patent Court".

tgdaily.com

"Minister announces way forward for software patents". beehive.govt.nz. 2010-07-15. Archived from the original on 2010-09-20. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
Varghese, Sam (16 July 2010). "New Zealand says no to software patents". Government Tech Policy. Archived from the original on 16 January 2013. Retrieved 7 November 2012.
"South Pacific cousins part ways over patents". Cpaglobal.com. 2010-07-28. Archived from the original on 2012-08-26. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
"New Zealand bans software patents". TG Daily. 2010-07-15. Archived from the original on 2012-04-06. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
Fairfax Media Business Group (2010-04-15). "NZICT says patents 'integral' to software protection | Computerworld New Zealand". Computerworld.co.nz. Archived from the original on 2013-01-15. Retrieved 2012-10-09. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)

theguardian.com

Stallman, Richard (June 20, 2005). "Patent absurdity". The Guardian. London. Retrieved May 23, 2010.

unicode.org

Scherer, Markus; Davis, Mark (2006-02-04). "UTN #6: BOCU-1". Retrieved 2014-02-05.

uspto.gov

"MPEP".
"Examination Guidelines for Computer-Related Inventions". United States Patent Office. 1996-03-26. Retrieved 2014-05-20.
"Patent Counts By Class By Year, CY 1977 - 2015". United States Patent and Trademark Office. Retrieved 2017-03-13.

warwick.ac.uk

www2.warwick.ac.uk

Beresford, K (2000). Patenting Software under the European Patent Convention. London: Sweet & Maxwell. p. 4.
Kretschmer, Martin (4 July 2003). "Software as Text and Machine: The Legal Capture of Digital Innovation". Journal of Information Law & Technology (JILT). Centre for Intellectual Property Policy and Management, Bournemouth University.

washingtonpost.com

Newsbytes, Thailand Mulls Software Patent Rules, at (last visited Jul. 25, 2000).

web.archive.org

"Examination Guidelines for Patent and Utility Model in Japan (REQUIREMENTS FOR PATENTABILITY)" (PDF). jpo.go.jp. pp. 1–3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-03-23. Retrieved 2009-11-21.
Examination Guidelines for Inventions for Specific Fields (Computer Software-Related Inventions) in Japan (PDF), Japanese Patent Office, April 2005, p. 10 (2.2.1), archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-03-23, retrieved 2009-11-21
Examination Guidelines for Inventions for Specific Fields (Computer Software-Related Inventions) in Japan (PDF), Japanese Patent Office, April 2005, pp. 16–17 ("Systematization of human transactions"), archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-03-23, retrieved 2009-11-21
"Minister announces way forward for software patents". beehive.govt.nz. 2010-07-15. Archived from the original on 2010-09-20. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
Varghese, Sam (16 July 2010). "New Zealand says no to software patents". Government Tech Policy. Archived from the original on 16 January 2013. Retrieved 7 November 2012.
"South Pacific cousins part ways over patents". Cpaglobal.com. 2010-07-28. Archived from the original on 2012-08-26. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
"New Zealand bans software patents". TG Daily. 2010-07-15. Archived from the original on 2012-04-06. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
Fairfax Media Business Group (2010-04-15). "NZICT says patents 'integral' to software protection | Computerworld New Zealand". Computerworld.co.nz. Archived from the original on 2013-01-15. Retrieved 2012-10-09. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
Patents Act, No. 57 of 1978, as amended (PDF), 26 April 1978, archived from the original (PDF) on 12 December 2011, retrieved 25 September 2011
Patents Act, No. 57 of 1978, as amended Section 25(3) (PDF), 26 April 1978, archived from the original (PDF) on 12 December 2011, retrieved 25 September 2011
FAQ – Korea, European Patent Office, archived from the original on 13 September 2009, retrieved 29 October 2008
Peter B. Hirtle, Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States, 1 January 2007. Archived July 4, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
"Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 13 of July 28, 2016, on Patents". wipolex.wipo.int. Archived from the original on July 10, 2022. Retrieved April 12, 2020.
"Regulations under the Patent Cooperation Treaty" (PDF). WIPO. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-02-28. Retrieved 2020-04-12.
Amendment 23 to the proposed Directive on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions (PDF), European Parliament, September 2003, archived from the original (PDF) on February 10, 2006
Dispositions program decision, Bundesgerichtshof (, BGH, Federal Court of Justice of Germany), 1976-06-22
Laub, Christoph (2005) [Academic Year 2004/2005]. International Software Patent Filing: The Problem of Statutory Subject Matter in view of Legal Standards at the EPO-USPTO and Economic Implications (PDF) (Master's). Munich Intellectual Property Law Center. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 21, 2007. Retrieved 21 March 2006.
"Public consultation on level of the inventive step required for obtaining patents" (PDF). UK Intellectual Property Office. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-01-04. Retrieved 2007-06-05.
"The India Patents Act, 1970 and Software Patentability" (PDF). www.managingip.com. 7 March 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-04-17. Retrieved 2020-03-27.
"Effects". Patentability and Democracy in Europe. Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure. Archived from the original on February 10, 2007.
"Patent Policy". Novell. Archived from the original on 2013-07-30. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
"Sun Grants Global Open Source Community Access to More than 1,600 Patents" (Press release). Sun Microsystems. January 25, 2005. Archived from the original on December 2, 2008.
"Microsoft, Autodesk in patent licensing deal". IDG News Service. 2004-12-17. Archived from the original on January 15, 2013. Retrieved 2012-10-09.
FY 2004 U.S. Licensing Survey, Association of University Technology Managers, 2012-09-08, archived from the original on 2012-10-15, retrieved 2012-11-07

wipo.int

"Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 Year 2001" (PDF). WIPO.
Standing Committee on the Law of Patents (January 20, 2010). "Proposal from Brazil in respect of exceptions and limitations to patent rights" (PDF). World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved 4 February 2010.

wipolex.wipo.int

"Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 13 of July 28, 2016, on Patents". wipolex.wipo.int. Archived from the original on July 10, 2022. Retrieved April 12, 2020.

worldipreview.com

Sugimura, Kenji; Chen, Rebecca (1 October 2012), An important market: software patenting in Japan, World Intellectual Property Review

wsj.com

"The Gravity of the U.S. Patent Swindle". Wall Street Journal. 25 March 2006. p. A9.

zdnet.com

Rob O’Neill (August 28, 2013). "New Zealand bans software patents". ZDNet. Retrieved September 6, 2013.