Space Launch System (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Space Launch System" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
75th place
83rd place
2,428th place
1,659th place
1,876th place
1,225th place
2,930th place
2,204th place
388th place
265th place
9,535th place
6,953rd place
5,100th place
4,194th place
936th place
713th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8,446th place
6,634th place
low place
low place
14th place
14th place
49th place
47th place
low place
low place
1,290th place
1,111th place
2,734th place
1,606th place
9th place
13th place
1,181st place
736th place
low place
low place
54th place
48th place
low place
low place
758th place
500th place
529th place
314th place
28th place
26th place
1,241st place
1,069th place
1,013th place
739th place
730th place
468th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
223rd place
162nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
79th place
65th place
low place
low place
137th place
101st place
963rd place
540th place
4,183rd place
2,600th place
low place
low place
7th place
7th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,411th place
5,111th place
32nd place
21st place
low place
low place
20th place
30th place
low place
low place
8th place
10th place
low place
8,786th place
108th place
80th place
1,943rd place
1,253rd place
36th place
33rd place
low place
low place
1,283rd place
1,130th place
2nd place
2nd place
18th place
17th place
11th place
8th place
896th place
674th place
34th place
27th place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,954th place
1,848th place
low place
low place
low place
6,717th place
910th place
593rd place
low place
low place
312th place
197th place

aerospaceguide.net

al.com

blog.al.com

americaspace.com

archive-it.org

wayback.archive-it.org

archive.today

arstechnica.com

  • Berger, Eric (8 November 2019). "NASA does not deny the "over US$2 billion" cost of a single SLS launch". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 11 November 2019. Retrieved 13 November 2019. The White House number appears to include both the "marginal" cost of building a single SLS rocket as well as the "fixed" costs of maintaining a standing army of thousands of employees and hundreds of suppliers across the country. Building a second SLS rocket each year would make the per-unit cost "significantly less"
  • Berger, Eric (20 May 2019). "NASA's full Artemis plan revealed: 37 launches and a lunar outpost". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 23 May 2019. Retrieved 20 May 2019.
  • Hutchinson, Lee (15 April 2013). "New F-1B rocket engine upgrades Apollo-era design with 1.8M lbs of thrust". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 2 December 2017. Retrieved 15 April 2013.
  • Berger, Eric (5 November 2019). "NASA rejects Blue Origin's offer of a cheaper upper stage for the SLS rocket". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 19 December 2019. Retrieved 19 December 2019.
  • Berger, Eric (20 October 2017). "NASA chooses not to tell Congress how much deep space missions cost". arstechnica.com. Archived from the original on 17 December 2018. Retrieved 16 December 2018.
  • Berger, Eric (23 July 2021). "SpaceX to launch the Europa Clipper mission for a bargain price". Ars Technica. Retrieved 21 November 2022.
  • Clark, Stephen (29 September 2023). "Rocket Report: Iran launches satellite; Artemis II boosters get train ride". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2 October 2023.
  • Berger, Eric (31 August 2021). "NASA's big rocket misses another deadline, now won't fly until 2022". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 1 September 2021. Retrieved 1 September 2021.
  • "The SLS rocket finally has a believable launch date, and it's soon". Ars Technica. 20 July 2022. Archived from the original on 20 July 2022. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
  • "New Report Finds Nasa Awarded Boeing Large Fees Despite SLS Launch Slips". ArsTechnica. 19 June 2019. Archived from the original on 14 August 2019. Retrieved 1 August 2019.
  • Berger, Eric (1 August 2019). "The SLS rocket may have curbed development of on-orbit refueling for a decade". Archived from the original on 5 August 2019. Retrieved 5 August 2019.

asee.org

aviationweek.com

bbc.co.uk

bbc.com

boeing.com

c-span.org

cbsnews.com

cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

cnn.com

competitivespace.org

congress.gov

doi.org

flickr.com

  • "What is ICPS?". United Launch Alliance. 23 June 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2021. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.

flightglobal.com

fool.com

forbes.com

futurism.com

gao.gov

  • "NASA HUMAN SPACE EXPLORATION: Persistent Delays and Cost Growth Reinforce Concerns over Management of Programs" (PDF). GAO. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 15 September 2020. NASA's current approach for reporting cost growth misrepresents the cost performance of the program and thus undermines the usefulness of a baseline as an oversight tool. NASA's space flight program and project management requirements state that the agency baseline commitment for a program is the basis for the agency's commitment to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Congress based on program requirements, cost, schedule, technical content, and an agreed-to joint cost and schedule confidence level. Removing effort that amounts to more than a tenth of a program's development cost baseline is a change in the commitment to OMB and the Congress and results in a baseline that does not reflect actual effort. [...] Further, the baseline is a key tool against which to measure the cost and schedule performance of a program. A program must be rebaselined and reauthorized by the Congress if the Administrator determines that development costs will increase by more than 30 percent. Accounting for shifted costs, our analysis indicates that NASA has reached 29.0 percent development cost growth for the SLS program. [...] In addition, as we previously reported in May 2014, NASA does not have a cost and schedule baseline for SLS beyond the first flight. As a result, NASA cannot monitor or track costs shifted beyond EM-1 against a baseline. We recommended that NASA establish cost and schedule baselines that address the life cycle of each SLS increment, as well as for any evolved Orion or ground systems capability. NASA partially concurred with the recommendation, but has not taken any action to date. [...] By not adjusting the SLS baseline to account for the reduced scope, NASA will continue to report costs against an inflated baseline, hence underreporting the extent of cost growth. NASA's Associate Administrator and Chief Financial Officer stated that they understood our rationale for removing these costs from the EM-1 baseline and agreed that not doing so could result in underreporting of cost growth. Further, the Associate Administrator told us that the agency will be relooking at the SLS program's schedule, baseline, and calculation of cost growth. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.

ghostarchive.org

  • Town Hall with Administrator Bridenstine and NASA's New HEO Associate Administrator Douglas Loverro (YouTube). NASA. 3 December 2019. Event occurs at 24:58. Archived from the original on 31 October 2021. Retrieved 20 January 2021. "I do not agree with the US$2 billion number, it is far less than that. I would also say that the number comes way down when you buy more than one or two. And so I think at the end we're going to be, you know, in the US$800 million to US$900 million range – I don't know, honestly. We've recently just begun negotiations on what number three through whatever – we don't have to buy any quite frankly, but we intend to. But we're looking at what we could negotiate to get the best price for the American taxpayper, which is my obligation as the head of NASA". Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.

govtribe.com

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

house.gov

docs.house.gov

rohrabacher.house.gov

independent.co.uk

moonandback.com

nasa.gov

nasa.gov

blogs.nasa.gov

oig.nasa.gov

  • "NASA'S MANAGEMENT OF THE ARTEMIS MISSIONS" (PDF). Office of Inspector General (United States). NASA. 15 November 2021. p. numbered page 23, PDF page 29. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 November 2021. Retrieved 15 November 2021. SLS/Orion Production and Operating Costs Will Average Over $4 Billion Per Launch [...] We project the cost to fly a single SLS/Orion system through at least Artemis IV to be $4.1 billion per launch at a cadence of approximately one mission per year. Building and launching one Orion capsule costs approximately $1 billion, with an additional $300 million for the Service Module supplied by the ESA [...] In addition, we estimate the single-use SLS will cost $2.2 billion to produce, including two rocket stages, two solid rocket boosters, four RS-25 engines, and two stage adapters. Ground systems located at Kennedy where the launches will take place—the Vehicle Assembly Building, Crawler-Transporter, Mobile Launcher 1, Launch Pad, and Launch Control Center—are estimated to cost $568 million per year due to the large support structure that must be maintained. The $4.1 billion total cost represents production of the rocket and the operations needed to launch the SLS/Orion system including materials, labor, facilities, and overhead, but does not include any money spent either on prior development of the system or for next-generation technologies such as the SLS's Exploration Upper Stage, Orion's docking system, or Mobile Launcher 2. [...] The cost per launch was calculated as follows: $1 billion for the Orion based on information provided by ESD officials and NASA OIG analysis; $300 million for the ESA's Service Module based on the value of a barter agreement between ESA and the United States in which ESA provides the service modules in exchange for offsetting its ISS responsibilities; $2.2 billion for the SLS based on program budget submissions and analysis of contracts; and $568 million for EGS costs related to the SLS/Orion launch as provided by ESD officials. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  • "NASA's Management of the Space Launch System Stages Contract" (PDF). oig.nasa.gov. NASA Office of Inspector General Office of Audits. 10 October 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2018. Retrieved 14 October 2018. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  • "MANAGEMENT OF NASA'S EUROPA MISSION" (PDF). oig.nasa.gov. 29 May 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 June 2019. Retrieved 8 November 2019. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  • "Follow-up to May 2019 Audit of Europa Mission – Congressional Launch Vehicle Mandate" (PDF). oig.nasa.gov. 27 August 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 20 January 2021. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  • "NASA’s Transition of the Space Launch System to a Commercial Services Contract" oig.nasa.gov. 12 October 2023. Retrieved 7 June 2024.
  • "Report No. IG-20-018: NASA's Management of the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle Program" (PDF). Office of Inspector General (United States). NASA. 16 July 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 July 2020. Retrieved 17 July 2020. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  • "NASA'S MANAGEMENT OF SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM PROGRAM COSTS AND CONTRACTS" (PDF). NASA – Office of Inspector General – Office of Audits. 10 March 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 August 2020. Retrieved 14 September 2020. Based on our review of SLS Program cost reporting, we found that the Program exceeded its Agency Baseline Commitment (ABC) by at least 33 percent at the end of FY 2019, a figure that could reach 43 percent or higher if additional delays push the launch date for Artemis I beyond November 2020. This is due to cost increases tied to Artemis I and a December 2017 replan that removed almost $1 billion of costs from the ABC without lowering the baseline, thereby masking the impact of Artemis I's projected 19-month schedule delay from November 2018 to a June 2020 launch date. Since the replan, the SLS Program now projects the Artemis I launch will be delayed to at least spring 2021 or later. Further, we found NASA's ABC cost reporting only tracks Artemis I-related activities and not additional expenditures of almost $6 billion through FY 2020 that are not being reported or tracked through the official congressional cost commitment or the ABC. [...] as a result of delaying Artemis I up to 19 months to June 2020, NASA conducted a replan of the SLS Program in 2017 and removed $889 million in Booster and RS-25 Engine-related development costs because SLS Program officials determined those activities were not directly tied to Artemis I. [...] In our judgement, the removal of these costs should have reduced the SLS Program's ABC development costs from $7.02 billion to $6.13 billion. [...] SLS Program and HEOMD officials disagreed with our assessment and stated the SLS Program's change in cost estimates for the Booster and Engines element offices were not a removal of costs but rather a reallocation of those activities to appropriately account for them as non-Artemis I costs. [...] Federal law requires that any time Agency program managers have reasonable knowledge that development costs are likely to exceed the ABC by more than 30 percent, they must notify the NASA Administrator. Once the Administrator determines the SLS Program will exceed the development cost baseline by 30 percent or more, NASA is required to notify Congress and rebaseline program costs and schedule commitments. If the Administrator notifies Congress of the need to rebaseline, NASA is required to stop funding program activities within 18 months unless Congress provides approval and additional appropriations. In our judgement, using NASA's cost estimates from October 2019 and accounting for the removed costs from the replan, the SLS Program was required to rebaseline when the program exceeded its ABC by 33 percent at the end of FY 2019, an increase that could reach 43 percent or higher by the Artemis I launch date. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.

ntrs.nasa.gov

jpl.nasa.gov

asd.gsfc.nasa.gov

sma.nasa.gov

wwwastro.msfc.nasa.gov

nasaspaceflight.com

nasawatch.com

nbcnews.com

nextbigfuture.com

northropgrumman.com

news.northropgrumman.com

nss.org

nytimes.com

parabolicarc.com

phys.org

planetary.org

politico.com

reuters.com

rocket.com

rocketlaunch.org

sam.gov

scientificamerican.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

senate.gov

appropriations.senate.gov

  • Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023

commerce.senate.gov

seradata.com

space-travel.com

space.com

spaceflightinsider.com

spaceflightnow.com

spacefrontier.org

spacenews.com

spacepolicyonline.com

spaceref.com

spaceref.com

images.spaceref.com

tbe.com

technologyreview.com

teledyne.com

thespacereview.com

tmcnet.com

satellite.tmcnet.com

ulalaunch.com

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

whitehouse.gov

worldcat.org

wsj.com

youtube.com