Spontaneous human combustion (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Spontaneous human combustion" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
4th place
4th place
1st place
1st place
3,411th place
2,303rd place
3rd place
3rd place
30th place
24th place
26th place
20th place
16th place
23rd place
1,190th place
959th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6,213th place
3,969th place
4,757th place
4,726th place
137th place
101st place
5,748th place
3,460th place
low place
low place
840th place
635th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
175th place
137th place
774th place
716th place
59th place
45th place
829th place
485th place
266th place
182nd place
32nd place
21st place
8,948th place
6,220th place
11th place
8th place
1,266th place
860th place
low place
low place
136th place
93rd place
93rd place
73rd place
low place
low place
37th place
37th place
4,002nd place
low place
631st place
390th place
1,655th place
1,004th place
7th place
7th place
5th place
5th place
98th place
75th place

artcmr.com

astm.org

avclub.com

games.avclub.com

books.google.com

brianjford.com

centerforinquiry.org

csicop.org

doi.org

gamerant.com

ghostarchive.org

howstuffworks.com

science.howstuffworks.com

imdb.com

indiewire.com

irishtimes.com

jstor.org

livescience.com

  • Radford, Benjamin (19 December 2013). "Spontaneous Human Combustion: Facts & Theory". Live Science. Yet all these explanations are pseudoscientific, and there is no evidence for any of them

mcri.org

metacritic.com

myanimelist.net

nbcnews.com

news.google.com

newscientist.com

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nytimes.com

online-literature.com

popmatters.com

screenrant.com

seeker.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

skepdic.com

skeptoid.com

tampabay.com

telegraph.co.uk

theskepticsguide.org

  • "Skeptics Guide to the Universe #268". The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe. 1 September 2010. Retrieved 13 June 2016. At 26:38, Novella says: "I think that part of the knee-jerk skepticism is that we hear things like spontaneous human combustion—we know that's total BS—and then when you hear just spontaneous combustion it triggers the same response as if it has anything to do with spontaneous human combustion but it really doesn't. I hear that a lot, too, a lot of people think that anything to do with magnets must be crap because there's so much magnet pseudoscience out there but that doesn't mean that there aren't legitimate uses of magnets in medicine. We can affect brain function with transcranial magnetic stimulation, for example. But again people make that association, that's just a little too simplistic, that magnets equal pseudoscience, that spontaneous combustion equals pseudoscience, but this is perfectly legitimate."

trakt.tv

umn.edu

dtc.umn.edu

vice.com

broadly.vice.com

web.archive.org

worldcat.org