Standing (law) (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Standing (law)" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

13justia.com

696^th place

428^th place

10austlii.edu.au

1,812^th place

995^th place

3web.archive.org

1^st place

3ssrn.com

703^rd place

501^st place

2umontreal.ca

6,223^rd place

6,135^th place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

1qpilch.org.au

low place

1nsw.gov.au

640^th place

382^nd place

1swarb.co.uk

low place

1jmls.edu

low place

1cornell.edu

332^nd place

246^th place

1ca.gov

421^st place

263^rd place

1uscourts.gov

2,275^th place

1,288^th place

1ceb.com

low place

9,472^nd place

1findlaw.com

1,478^th place

868^th place

austlii.edu.au

Australian Conservation Foundation v Commonwealth [1980] HCA 53, (1980) 146 CLR 493 (13 February 1980).
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5.
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 3(4).
Right To Life Association (NSW) Inc v Secretary, Department of Human Services and Health and Family Planning Inc (Vic) [1995] FCA 1060, (1995) 128 ALR 238, Federal Court (Australia).
Sinclair v Marybourough Mining Warden [1975] HCA 17, (1975) 132 CLR 473 (28 May 1975), High Court (Australia).
Onus v Alcoa of Australia Ltd [1981] HCA 50, (1981) 149 CLR 27 (18 September 1981), High Court (Australia).
see Transurban v Allan [1999] FCA 1723, (1999) 95 FCR 553 (10 December 1999), Federal Court (Australia).
Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Ltd [2000] HCA 11, (2000) 200 CLR 591 (9 March 2000), High Court (Australia).
Ruddock v Vadarlis (Tampa case) [2001] FCA 1329, (2001) 110 FCR 491 (18 September 2001), Federal Court (Australia).
US tobacco v Minister for Consumer Affairs [1988] FCA 213, (1988) 20 FCR 520 (24 June 1988), Federal Court (Australia).

books.google.com

Neubauer, David W.; Meinhold, Stephen S. (2017). Judicial Process: Law, Courts, and Politics in the United States (7th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning. p. 412. ISBN 9781337025942.

ca.gov

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov

Cal. Code of Civil Procedure § 526a

ceb.com

online.ceb.com

See, e.g., Humane Society of the United States v. State Bd. of Equalization, 152 Cal. App. 4th 349 (2007).

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

"Substantial Interest: Standing". LII / Legal Information Institute.

findlaw.com

caselaw.findlaw.com

Jasmine Networks, Inc. v. Superior Court (Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.), 180 Cal. App. 4th 980 (2009).

jmls.edu

repository.jmls.edu

Varma, Corey (2016). "The Presumption of Injury: Giving Data Breach Victims 'A Leg To Stand On'". Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law. 32 (4).

justia.com

supreme.justia.com

Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 752 (1984).
Frothingham v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923).
Fairchild v. Hughes, 258 U.S. 126 (1922).
Bond v. United States, 564 U.S. 211 (2011).
Clapper v. Amnesty International USA, 568 U.S. 398 (2013)
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992).
Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States ex rel. Stevens, 529 U.S. 765 (2000).
Federal Election Commission v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998).
Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737 (1984).
Nathan D. Sturycz, The King and I?: An Examination of the Interest Qui Tam Relators Represent and the Implications for Future False Claims Act Litigation, 28 St. Louis Pub. L. Rev. 459 (2009), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1537749. For the general standing rule, see Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992).
Summers v. Earth Island Institute, 555 U.S. 488 (2009)
Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83 (1968).
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332 (2006).

nsw.gov.au

lec.lawlink.nsw.gov.au

Justice Brian J Preston,Standing to Sue at Common Law in Australia Archived 2014-03-02 at the Wayback Machine.

qpilch.org.au

Standing in public interest cases, Queensland Public Interest Law Clearing House Incorporated

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

Lee, Evan; Mason Ellis, Josephine (December 3, 2012). "The Standing Doctrine's Dirty Little Secret". Northwestern Law Review. 107: 169. SSRN 2027130.
Sassman, Wyatt (2015). "A Survey of Constitutional Standing in State Courts". SSRN. SSRN 2977348. Retrieved 2022-12-27.

ssrn.com

Nathan D. Sturycz, The King and I?: An Examination of the Interest Qui Tam Relators Represent and the Implications for Future False Claims Act Litigation, 28 St. Louis Pub. L. Rev. 459 (2009), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1537749. For the general standing rule, see Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992).

swarb.co.uk

"Whitehouse v Lemon, Whitehouse v Gay News Ltd". lawindexpro.

umontreal.ca

scc.lexum.umontreal.ca

"Supreme Court of Canada - Decisions - Canadian Council of Churches v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration)". Archived from the original on 2007-03-10. Retrieved 2006-06-08.
Finlay v. Canada (Minister of Finance), [1986] 2 S.C.R. 607 [1] Archived 2007-03-10 at the Wayback Machine.

uscourts.gov

cafc.uscourts.gov

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Digitalis Education Solutions and United States v Morris & Lee (Doing Business as Science First), p. 5, decided 4 January 2012, accessed 19 December 2023

web.archive.org

Justice Brian J Preston,Standing to Sue at Common Law in Australia Archived 2014-03-02 at the Wayback Machine.
"Supreme Court of Canada - Decisions - Canadian Council of Churches v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration)". Archived from the original on 2007-03-10. Retrieved 2006-06-08.
Finlay v. Canada (Minister of Finance), [1986] 2 S.C.R. 607 [1] Archived 2007-03-10 at the Wayback Machine.