Supremacy Clause (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Supremacy Clause" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
3rd place
3rd place
332nd place
246th place
1,697th place
1,040th place
6,211th place
3,772nd place
low place
low place
565th place
460th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1st place
1st place
6th place
6th place
305th place
264th place
2nd place
2nd place
5th place
5th place
11th place
8th place
230th place
214th place

archive.org

books.google.com

cambridge.org

constitutioncenter.org

  • Nelson, Caleb; Roosevelt, Kermit. "The Supremacy Clause". Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: National Constitution Center. Retrieved October 10, 2019.
  • "Interpretation: The Supremacy Clause | The National Constitution Center". constitutioncenter.org. Retrieved December 29, 2021. Under the Supremacy Clause, the "supreme Law of the Land" also includes federal statutes enacted by Congress. Within the limits of the powers that Congress gets from other parts of the Constitution, Congress can establish rules of decision that American courts are bound to apply, even if state law purports to supply contrary rules. Congress also has at least some authority to put certain topics wholly off limits to state law, or otherwise to restrict what state law can validly say about those topics. As long as the directives that Congress enacts are indeed authorized by the Constitution, they take priority over both the ordinary laws and the constitution of each individual state.

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

doi.org

lawliberty.org

  • "The Priority of the Constitution over Federal Statutes - Mike Rappaport". Law & Liberty. April 13, 2012. Retrieved January 11, 2022.
  • "The Priority of the Constitution over Federal Statutes - Mike Rappaport". Law & Liberty. April 13, 2012. Retrieved January 11, 2022. During the ratification, various Federalists urged that "in pursuance" of the Constitution meant not just conformity with bicameralism and presentment, but otherwise consistent with the entire Constitution. Only such latter statutes were entitled to be treated as supreme over contrary state law. See, for example, Jensen, ed, 2 Documentary History of the Ratification at 517 (cited in note 59) (James Wilson commenting that "in pursuance" meant that a law was otherwise constitutional). Earlier, Wilson had claimed that Congress could not pass any laws restricting the press because such laws would not be in "pursuance" of the Constitution. Id at 455. See also Jonathan Elliot, ed, 4 The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution 188 (2d ed 1836) (Governor Johnston of North Carolina commenting that every law consistent with the Constitution is "made in Pursuance" of it; those laws inconsistent are not made in Pursuance of it); id at 182 (William Davie commenting to the same effect); id at 28, 178–79 (James Iredell commenting to the same effect); Federalist 33 (Hamilton), in The Federalist 203, 207 (Wesleyan 1961) (Jacob E. Cooke, ed) (claiming that laws that are not pursuant to the Constitution, but instead invade state power, are acts of usurpation).

michiganlawreview.org

opiniojuris.org

scholar.google.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

uchicago.edu

press-pubs.uchicago.edu

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

yale.edu

avalon.law.yale.edu