Swift raids (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Swift raids" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
low place
low place
7th place
7th place
4,637th place
2,781st place
770th place
472nd place
696th place
428th place
1,873rd place
1,347th place
low place
9,950th place
low place
low place
1,418th place
966th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
166th place
121st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
914th place
530th place
1st place
1st place
1,107th place
652nd place
1,708th place
1,051st place
2nd place
2nd place
1,427th place
792nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
4,371st place
3,452nd place

americanapparel.net

  • Saenz, Andrea (13 March 2008). "Immigration Enforcement Chief Speaks on Security". The Harvard Law Record. Retrieved 20 August 2012. This moderate view was questioned by a student who asked why ICE continued to prioritize large-scale workplace raids if Myers hoped those workers would soon be able to legalize their status. Myers replied that in the absence of immigration reform, she felt like she could not ignore a part of the law, and said that she believed the Swift company raids in Colorado and elsewhere were "righteous" largely because they involved identity theft.

cata-farmworkers.org

catholic.org

cis.org

cityweekly.net

clearinghouse.net

  • Dalton, Dan (23 October 2007). "Swift & Company v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement". Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse. University of Michigan. Retrieved 20 August 2012. A closed hearing was held on December 6, 2006. On December 7, 2006, the District Court (Judge Mary Lou Robinson) denied Swift's request for a preliminary injunction.

denverpost.com

deseretnews.com

doi.org

fosterquan.com

hjnews.com

news.hjnews.com

hsdl.org

  • "Remarks by Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, Immigration and Customs Enforcement Assistant Secretary Julie Myers, and Federal Trade Commission Chairman Deborah Platt Majoras at a Press Conference on Operation Wagon Train [December 13, 2006]". Homeland Security Digital Library. 2006-12-13. Retrieved 20 August 2012.

justia.com

law.justia.com

  • United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, et al., v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, Secretary, et al. (N.D. Tex. 1 March 2011), Text.
  • Jesus Barrera, Loida Nohemi Cruz, Juan Morales Gomez, Rogelio Hernandez, Jose Pedro Lira, Mario Martinez, Paul Martinez, Jose Angel Juarez Mendez, Miguel A. Miranda, and Rosa Sagastume, Plaintiffs, v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, United States Division of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Julie L. Myers, John P. Torres, Scott Baniecke, Kenneth Baird, Thomas M. Boyle, Craig Scherer, Tracy Warner, Jessica Begres, and John Doe ICE Agents Nos. 1–100, (D. Minn. 27 March 2009), Text.

legalactioncenter.org

  • Myers, Julie L. (18 December 2006). "RESPONDENT'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN RESPONSE TO THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE" (PDF). RINALDO YARRITO, et al. v. JULIE L. MYERS, Assistant Secretary for Homeland Security, et a. United States District Court for the District of Colorado. Retrieved 19 August 2012. This Court should deny the applicants' petition for a writ of habeas corpus because this Court does not have proper jurisdiction over respondent and because the petitioner Union does not have standing as next friend, and applicants and the Union have failed to exhaust administrative remedies. Further, even if the Court finds it has jurisdiction and the Union has standing as a next friend, the applicants fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted, as the government provided applicants with the requisite due process protections. In any event, the Court should make clear in its disposition that the petition applies only to the thirteen named applicants, as the applicants do not seek to certify a class, and the action cannot be maintained as a class action in any case.
  • Legal Action Center (2012). "Enforcement, Lawsuits". American Immigration Council. Retrieved 19 August 2012.
  • Blanca Valenzuela, et al. v. Swift Beef Company, Inc., et al. (N.D. Tex. 13 January 2011) ("Because it is not possible to determine class membership without an extensive factual inquiry into thousands of employees' work authorization, the Court finds that the class is not clearly ascertainable. Accordingly, the Court denies certification."), Text.

mncc.org

nytimes.com

pewresearch.org

publicradio.org

minnesota.publicradio.org

sfgate.com

sltrib.com

startribune.com

ucdavis.edu

lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu

  • Aldana, Raquel (2008). "Of Katz and 'Aliens': Privacy Expectations and the Immigration Raids" (PDF). UC Davis Law Review. 41 (3). Retrieved 20 August 2012. ICE's new worksite enforcement strategy, begun in eleven major U.S. cities, adopts a comprehensive approach focusing on how illegal workers enter the country and obtain identity documents, as well as targeting employers who knowingly hire such workers.76 As a result of this strategy, the number of persons arrested in the workplace for being unable to prove legal immigration status jumped nearly tenfold since 2002 to 4,385 in fiscal year 2006. [...] n fact, ICE today is effectively, even if deceivingly,79 appealing to identity theft concerns, as well as to the image of foreigners as potential terrorists.

migration.ucdavis.edu

  • "Enforcement: Swift Fallout, Mismatches". Rural Migration News. 13 (1). January 2011. Retrieved 23 August 2012. ICE said the Swift raid was the largest workplace raid ever conducted by immigration authorities...

ufcw.org

unl.edu

digitalcommons.unl.edu

wagingnonviolence.org

web.archive.org