Taiwan independence movement (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Taiwan independence movement" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
1,398th place
881st place
3rd place
3rd place
3,205th place
2,266th place
5,138th place
low place
1,382nd place
876th place
2nd place
2nd place
26th place
20th place
49th place
47th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
581st place
738th place
99th place
77th place
5,630th place
low place
79th place
65th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
321st place
724th place
low place
low place
392nd place
5,209th place
low place
low place
440th place
5,818th place
6,266th place
4,133rd place
low place
low place
362nd place
245th place
1,275th place
722nd place
268th place
215th place
61st place
54th place
1,648th place
1,137th place
low place
low place
1,067th place
749th place
1,538th place
1,042nd place
4,052nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
543rd place
346th place
2,412th place
4,326th place
low place
low place
97th place
164th place
211th place
915th place
2,812th place
1,942nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
965th place
579th place
low place
8,547th place
1,893rd place
3,729th place
3,164th place
2,032nd place

aljazeera.com

aspeninstitute.org

assets.aspeninstitute.org

bloomberg.com

boca.gov.tw

books.google.com

cfr.org

chinapost.com.tw

chinatimes.com

news.chinatimes.com

cw.com.tw

english.cw.com.tw

doi.org

efe.com

focustaiwan.tw

fordham.edu

ir.lawnet.fordham.edu

fpri.org

free-apply.com

free.fr

peggy.hsieh.free.fr

globaltaiwan.org

gwytb.gov.cn

jstor.org

nccu.edu.tw

esc.nccu.edu.tw

nikkei.com

asia.nikkei.com

pfp.org.tw

post.gov.tw

reuters.com

rfa.org

sandiegouniontribune.com

scmp.com

straitstimes.com

taipeitimes.com

taiwan.gov.tw

  • "FOREIGN AFFAIRS". Taiwan (official website). 15 November 2019. Archived from the original on 15 November 2019. Retrieved 16 November 2019.

taiwandc.org

taiwandocuments.org

taiwangazette.org

taiwannews.com.tw

taiwanus.net

theaustralian.com.au

thediplomat.com

  • Nachmann, Lev. "No, Taiwan's President Isn't 'Pro-Independence'". The Diplomat. James Pach. Archived from the original on 28 October 2020. Retrieved 27 July 2020.
  • van der Wees, Gerrit. "When the CCP Thought Taiwan Should Be Independent". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 8 November 2023. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
  • Chen, Dingding (25 May 2016). "Without Clarity on 1992 Consensus, Tsai and DPP Will Face Challenges Ahead". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 16 December 2016.

thenewslens.com

international.thenewslens.com

  • American Chamber of Commerce in Taiwan (7 July 2017). "On the Front Lines of Taiwan's History in Kinmen". The News Lens International Edition (This article discusses the history of Kuomintang influence in Kinmen and Matsu and the absence of Taiwan independence sentiments.). Archived from the original on 2 June 2019. Retrieved 2 June 2019. Further, Kinmen differs from Taiwan in its consistently close ties with the Chinese Nationalist Party or Kuomintang (KMT). Indeed, Kinmen is one of the few locations in ROC territory that the DPP has never controlled. The reason can be traced to the late 1940s, when some Taiwanese began to view the KMT as unwelcome occupiers. That view never took hold in Kinmen, Weng notes. During the Cold War, "the military was here on the front lines protecting people from the enemy – Communist China," he says. Since soldiers were numerous, "they made important contributions to the local economy too. Their presence created many business opportunities." Critically, Kinmen did not experience the 2–28 Incident, an uprising against Nationalist rule in Taiwan that began on February 28, 1947. Government troops brutally suppressed the rebellion; the death toll is generally estimated at 18,000- 28,000. To this day, opponents of the KMT in Taiwan trace their antipathy toward the party to the 2–28 Incident and the subsequent White Terror.

time.com

tpof.org

udn.com

un.org

  • United Nations (25 October 1999). "UN Trusteeship Council". United Nations. Archived from the original on 22 March 2022. Retrieved 26 July 2023. The UN Charter established the Trusteeship Council as one of the main organs of the United Nations, and assigned to it the task of supervising the administration of Trust Territories placed under the International Trusteeship System. The Trusteeship Council suspended its operations on 1 November 1994, a month after the independence of Palau, the last remaining United Nations trust territory.

unc.edu

americandiplomacy.web.unc.edu

  • Norris, Robert B. (November 2010). "Quemoy and Matsu: A Historical Footnote Revisited". American Diplomacy (This is an article discussing the usage of the phrase "Quemoy and Matsu". The phrase was widely used throughout American political discourse during the 1950s–1970s. In modern times, Quemoy is called "Kinmen".). Archived from the original on 7 June 2019. Retrieved 7 June 2019. Early on in the presidential debates, Kennedy was asked if the United States defense line in the Far East should include Quemoy and Matsu. Kennedy responded that these islands — just a few miles off the coast of China and more than a hundred miles from Taiwan — were strategically indefensible and were not essential to the defense of Taiwan. The Massachusetts Senator also alluded to the unsuccessful efforts by the Eisenhower Administration to persuade Chiang Kai-shek to abandon the offshore islands in order to avoid the possibility of being dragged into a major confrontation with the PRC over these two islands. Perhaps feeling the need to disagree with Kennedy, Vice President Nixon countered. Since Quemoy and Matsu were in the "area of freedom," Nixon contended that they should not be surrendered to the Communists as a matter of "principle." Theodore H. White was of the opinion that Kennedy's initial answer to the question on Quemoy and Matsu was "probably one of the sharpest and clearest responses of any question of the debates."

vagabondjourney.com

voanews.com

warontherocks.com

washington.edu

digital.law.washington.edu

  • "Data" (PDF). digital.law.washington.edu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 February 2016. Retrieved 11 April 2016.

web.archive.org

wsj.com

wsj.com

blogs.wsj.com

wufi.org.tw