Textus Receptus (English Wikipedia)

Knust, Jeniffer (2007). "Early Christian Re-Writing and the History of the Pericope Adulterae". academia.edu. Journal of Early Christian Studies. pp. 499–500. Retrieved October 12, 2022.

acadiau.ca

scholar.acadiau.ca

"In time, Erasmus' text became known as the "Textus receptus" (largely through a marketing strategy employed by the Elzevir publishers in 1633) - the "received text" implying verbal inspiration." Eisener, Wendell L. (1999). Matthew's Beatitudes in English: a comparative study in the history of translation (Thesis). Acadia University.

archive.org

S. P. Tregelles, An Account of the Printed Text of the Greek New Testament, London 1854, p. 29.
Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose (1894). The New Testament in the original Greek, according to the text followed in the Autnorized Version. University of California Libraries. Cambridge : University Press.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)
Westcott & Hort, The New Testament In The Original Greek (New York 1882)
Wilbur N. Pickering (2020-06-25). The Greek New Testament According To Family 35, Third Edition.
Zane C. Hodges, Arthur L. Farstad (1984). The Greek New Testament According to the Majority Text (Hodges-Farstad GNT).
The orthodox confession of the catholic and apostolic Eastern-Church, p.16, 1762. Greek and Latin in Schaff The Creeds of Christendom p. 275, 1877
Maurice A. Robinson & William G. Pierpont. The New Testament In The Original Greek Byzantine Textform [By, Maurice A. Robinson & William G. Pierpont] [© 2005].
Zane C. Hodges, Arthur L. Farstad (1984). The Greek New Testament According to the Majority Text (Hodges-Farstad GNT).
Hoskier, H. C. (Herman Charles) (1911). Concerning the date of the Bohairic version; covering a detailed examination of the text of the Apocalypse and a review of some of the writings of the Egyptian monks. Cornell University Library. London : B. Quaritch.
Wilbur N. Pickering (2020-06-25). The Greek New Testament According To Family 35, Third Edition.
Metzger, Bruce M. (Bruce Manning) (1994). A textual commentary on the Greek New Testament : a companion volume to the United Bible Societies' Greek New Testament. Internet Archive (fourth revised ed.). Stuttgart : Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft; U.S.A. : United Bible Societies. ISBN 978-3-438-06010-5.
Reid, G. J. "The Evolution of Our English Bible", The American Catholic Quarterly Review, Vol. XXX, pp. 581, 1905.
Newman, John Henry Cardinal "The Text of the Rheims and Douay Version of Holy Scripture", The Rambler, Vol. I, New Series, Part II, July 1859.

asburyseminary.edu

place.asburyseminary.edu

Robinson, Maurice (1998-01-01). "Preliminary observations regarding the pericope adulterae based upon fresh collations of nearly all continuous-text manuscripts and over one hundred lectionaries". Conference Papers.

bible-researcher.com

Michael D. Marlowe states:[1] yet it differs from the Received Text in about a thousand places, most of them being trivial. while Daniel B. Wallace [2] Archived 2007-08-05 at the Wayback Machine has counted 1,838 differences between it and the Textus Receptus.
"What about the Majority Text?". www.bible-researcher.com. Retrieved 2024-01-17.

bible.org

Michael D. Marlowe states:[1] yet it differs from the Received Text in about a thousand places, most of them being trivial. while Daniel B. Wallace [2] Archived 2007-08-05 at the Wayback Machine has counted 1,838 differences between it and the Textus Receptus.
"The Comma Johanneum and Cyprian | Bible.org". bible.org. Retrieved 2024-05-19.

biblegateway.com

"Bible Gateway passage: 1 John 5:7 - New English Translation". Bible Gateway. Retrieved 2024-05-19.
"Bible Gateway passage: Acts 8:37 - King James Version". Bible Gateway. Retrieved 2024-05-21.
"Bible Gateway passage: Mark 16:9-11 - New English Translation". Bible Gateway. Retrieved 2024-07-02.

books.google.com

Epp, Eldon Jay (2020-11-30). Perspectives on New Testament Textual Criticism, Volume 2: Collected Essays, 2006–2017. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-44233-7.
Robertson, A. T. (2014-08-01). An Introduction to the Textual Criticism of the New Testament. Wipf and Stock Publishers. ISBN 978-1-4982-0089-9.
Doble, Peter; Kloha, Jeffrey (2014-07-24). Texts and Traditions: Essays in Honour of J. Keith Elliott. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-27393-1.
Wettlaufer, Ryan Donald (2013-03-01). No Longer Written: The Use of Conjectural Emendation in the Restoration of the Text of the New Testament, the Epistle of James As a Case Study. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-23533-5.
Andrews, Edward D. (2023-06-15). THE TEXTUS RECEPTUS: The "Received Text" of the New Testament. Christian Publishing House. ISBN 979-8-3984-5852-7.
Waltz, Robert B. The Encyclopedia of New Testament Textual Criticism. Robert B. Waltz.
Waltz, Robert B. The Encyclopedia of New Testament Textual Criticism. Robert B. Waltz.
Andrews, Edward D. (2019-02-02). INTRODUCTION TO THE TEXT OF THE NEW TESTAMENT: From The Authors and Scribe to the Modern Critical Text. Christian Publishing House. ISBN 978-1-949586-78-7.
Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose (1883). A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament for the Use of Biblical Students. Deighton, Bell. As Apoc. 1 was mutilated in the last six verses, Erasmus turned these into Greek from the Latin; and some portions of his self-made version, which are found (however some editors may speak vaguely) in no one known Greek manuscript whatever, still cleave to our received text ^. Besides this scanty roll, however, he not rarely refers in his Annotations to other manuscripts he had seen in the course of his travels (e. g. on Heb. i. 3; Apoc. i. 4; viii. 13), yet too indistinctly for his allusions to be of much use to critics. Some such readings, as alleged by him, have not been found elsewhere
Koester, Helmut (2012-10-25). History and Literature of Early Christianity. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-081265-7.
Horne, Thomas Hartwell (1856). An Introduction to the Critical Study and Knowledge of the Holy Scriptures. Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans & Roberts.
Scrivener, Frederick H. (2004-04-01). The Authorized Version of the English Bible (1611): Its Subsequent Reprints and Modern Representatives. Wipf and Stock Publishers. ISBN 978-1-59244-634-6.
Whitby, Daniel (1 January 1710). "Additional Annotations to the New Testament: With Seven Discourses; and an Appendix Entituled Examen Variantium Lectionum Johannis Millii, S.T.P. in Novum Testamentum". W. Bowyer – via Google Books.
J. J. Griesbach, Novum Testamentum Graece, (London 1809)
Andrews, Edward D. (2023-06-15). THE TEXTUS RECEPTUS: The "Received Text" of the New Testament. Christian Publishing House. ISBN 979-8-3984-5852-7.
Beale, G. K. (2013-09-07). The Book of Revelation. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4674-2230-7.
Andrews, Edward D. (2023-06-15). THE TEXTUS RECEPTUS: The "Received Text" of the New Testament. Christian Publishing House. ISBN 979-8-3984-5852-7.
The orthodox confession of the catholic and apostolic Eastern-Church, p.16, 1762. Greek and Latin in Schaff The Creeds of Christendom p. 275, 1877
Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose (1894). A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament for the Use of Biblical Students. G. Bell.
Ehrman, Bart D. The Reliability of the New Testament. Fortress Press. ISBN 978-1-4514-1715-9.
White, James R.; Baird, Dr Mike (June 2009). The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust Modern Translations?. Baker Books. ISBN 978-0-7642-0605-4.
White, James R.; Baird, Dr Mike (June 2009). The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust Modern Translations?. Baker Books. ISBN 978-0-7642-0605-4.
Epp, Eldon Jay (2005-06-01). Perspectives on New Testament Textual Criticism: Collected Essays, 1962-2004. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-474-0695-2.
Wallace, Daniel B. (2009). Copan, Paul; Craig, William Lane (eds.). Contending with Christianity's Critics: Answering New Atheists and Other Objectors. B&H Publishing Group. pp. 154–155. ISBN 978-1-4336-6845-6.
Knust, Jennifer; Wasserman, Tommy (2018-11-13). To Cast the First Stone: The Transmission of a Gospel Story. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-18446-3.
Petersen, William Lawrence (2011-12-09). Patristic and Text-Critical Studies: The Collected Essays of William L. Petersen. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-19289-8.
Keith, Chris (2009). The Pericope Adulterae, the Gospel of John, and the Literacy of Jesus. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-17394-1.
Petersen, William Lawrence (2011-12-09). Patristic and Text-Critical Studies: The Collected Essays of William L. Petersen. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-19289-8.
Black, David Alan; Cerone, Jacob N. (2016-04-21). The Pericope of the Adulteress in Contemporary Research. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-0-567-66599-7.
Lunn, Nicholas P. (2015-04-30). The Original Ending of Mark: A New Case for the Authenticity of Mark 16:9-20. James Clarke & Company Limited. ISBN 978-0-227-90459-6.
Wallace, Daniel B. (2009). Copan, Paul; Craig, William Lane (eds.). Contending with Christianity's Critics: Answering New Atheists and Other Objectors. B&H Publishing Group. pp. 154–155. ISBN 978-1-4336-6845-6.
Ehrman, Bart D. (2008). Whose Word is It?: The Story Behind who Changed the New Testament and why. Continuum. p. 65. ISBN 978-1-84706-314-4.
Phillips, Peter (2016). Hunt, Steven A.; Tolmie, D. Francois; Zimmermann, Ruben (eds.). Character Studies in the Fourth Gospel. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 408. ISBN 978-0-8028-7392-7.
Houghton, H. A. G. (2016). The Latin New Testament: A Guide to Its Early History, Texts, and Manuscripts. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-874473-3.
McAllister, Colin (2020-03-26). The Cambridge Companion to Apocalyptic Literature. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-42270-3.
Andrews, Edward D. (2023-06-15). THE TEXTUS RECEPTUS: The "Received Text" of the New Testament. Christian Publishing House. ISBN 979-8-3984-5852-7.
White, James R. (June 2009). The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust Modern Translations?. Baker Books. ISBN 978-0-7642-0605-4.
Neville Figgis, CR: His Life, Thought and Significance. BRILL. 2021-11-29. ISBN 978-90-04-50312-0.
Hester, David W. (2015-03-19). Does Mark 16:9–20 Belong in the New Testament?. Wipf and Stock Publishers. ISBN 978-1-4982-0159-9.
Lunn, Nicholas P. (2014-10-01). The Original Ending of Mark: A New Case for the Authenticity of Mark 16:9–20. Wipf and Stock Publishers. ISBN 978-1-63087-520-6.
Amphoux, Christian; Elliott, James Keith (2011-12-09). Textual Research on the Psalms and Gospels / Recherches textuelles sur les psaumes et les évangiles: Papers from the Tbilisi Colloquium on the Editing and History of Biblical Manuscripts. Actes du Colloque de Tbilisi, 19-20 septembre 2007. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-21443-9.
Houghton, H. A. G.; Parker, David C.; Strutwolf, Holger (2019-12-02). The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium: Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. ISBN 978-3-11-059030-2.
Andrews, Edward D. (2023-06-15). THE TEXTUS RECEPTUS: The "Received Text" of the New Testament. Christian Publishing House. ISBN 979-8-3984-5852-7.
Gutjahr, Paul C. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of the Bible in America. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-025884-9.
Andrews, Edward D. (2019-02-02). INTRODUCTION TO THE TEXT OF THE NEW TESTAMENT: From The Authors and Scribe to the Modern Critical Text. Christian Publishing House. ISBN 978-1-949586-78-7.
Andrews, Edward D. (2020-02-21). FROM SPOKEN WORDS TO SACRED TEXTS: Introduction-Intermediate to New Testament Textual Studies. Christian Publishing House. ISBN 978-1-949586-98-5.
McDonald, Grantley (2016-07-27). Biblical Criticism in Early Modern Europe: Erasmus, the Johannine Comma and Trinitarian Debate. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-316-79078-6.
Metzger, Bruce Manning (1971). A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament: A Companion Volume to the United Bible Societies' Greek New Testament (3d Ed.). United Bible Societies. ISBN 978-3-438-06010-5.
Waltz, Robert B. The Encyclopedia of New Testament Textual Criticism. Robert B. Waltz.
DeConick, April; Shaw, Gregory; Turner, John D. (2013-08-22). Practicing Gnosis: Ritual, Magic, Theurgy and Liturgy in Nag Hammadi, Manichaean and Other Ancient Literature. Essays in Honor of Birger A. Pearson. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-24852-6.
Kannaday, Wayne Campbell (2004). Apologetic Discourse and the Scribal Tradition: Evidence of the Influence of Apologetic Interests on the Text of the Canonical Gospels. Society of Biblical Lit. ISBN 978-1-58983-101-8.
Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose (2010-10-21). The Authorized Version of the English Bible (1611): Its Subsequent Reprints and Modern Representatives. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-02463-1.
Krans, Jan (2006-09-01). Beyond What Is Written: Erasmus and Beza as Conjectural Critics of the New Testament. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-474-1051-5.

brill.com

Keith, Chris (2009-04-07), The Pericope Adulterae, the Gospel of John, and the Literacy of Jesus, Brill, ISBN 978-90-474-4019-2, retrieved 2024-01-13

byu.edu

rsc.byu.edu

"The Text of the New Testament". rsc.byu.edu.

catholic.com

"Why Is Acts 8:37 Omitted from Many Bible Translations?". Catholic Answers. Retrieved 2024-05-21.

ccel.org

"Philip Schaff: Creeds of Christendom, with a History and Critical notes. Volume I. The History of Creeds. - Christian Classics Ethereal Library". www.ccel.org. Retrieved 2024-05-19.

degruyterbrill.com

"Preface". The Correspondence of Erasmus. University of Toronto Press. 1 December 1977. pp. xi–xv. ISBN 978-1-4426-8100-2.

doi.org

Payne, Philip B.; Canart, Paul (2000). "The Originality of Text-Critical Symbols in Codex Vaticanus". Novum Testamentum. 42 (2): 105–113. doi:10.1163/156853600506799. ISSN 0048-1009. JSTOR 1561327.

febc.edu.sg

"Far Eastern Bible College – A History of My Defence of the King James Version".

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

McDonald, G. R (2011). Raising the ghost of Arius : Erasmus, the Johannine comma and religious difference in early modern Europe (Doctoral dissertation). Leiden University. hdl:1887/16486.

jbtc.org

Krans, Jan. "Erasmus and the Text of Revelation 22:19" (PDF). TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism.
"The Multivalence of the Ethiopian Eunuch and Acts 8:37" (PDF). TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism.
"The Multivalence of the Ethiopian Eunuch and Acts 8:37" (PDF). TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism.

jstor.org

Payne, Philip B.; Canart, Paul (2000). "The Originality of Text-Critical Symbols in Codex Vaticanus". Novum Testamentum. 42 (2): 105–113. doi:10.1163/156853600506799. ISSN 0048-1009. JSTOR 1561327.
"Vol. 36, 1982 of Dumbarton Oaks Papers on JSTOR". www.jstor.org. Retrieved 2024-01-27.

logos.com

"The Patriarchal Greek New Testament (PATr)". www.logos.com. Retrieved 2021-07-22.

modernenglishversion.com

"Home – MEV – Modern English Version".

mountainretreatorg.net

An Inquiry into the Integrity of the Greek Vulgate, or Received Text of the New Testament; in which the Greek Manuscripts are newly classed; the Integrity of the Authorised Text vindicated; and the Various Readings traced to their Origin (London, 1815), ch. 1. The sequel mentioned in the text is Nolan's Supplement to an Inquiry into the Integrity of the Greek Vulgate, or Received Text of the New Testament; containing the Vindication of the Principles employed in its Defence (London, 1830).
ibid., ch. 5

newadvent.org

"Polyglot Bibles". but in the fourth edition of Erasmus' work (1527), which forms the basis of the "Textus receptus", a strong influence of Ximenez' text is generally recognized.
"CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Epistles of Saint John". www.newadvent.org. Retrieved 2024-05-24. The Armenian manuscripts, which favour the reading of the Vulgate, are admitted to represent a Latin influence which dates from the twelfth century
Catholic Encyclopedia, "Epistles of St John"
Et iterum de Patre et Filio et Spiritu Sancto scriptum est—Et hi tres unum sunt. Cyprian, De Unitate Ecclesiæ (On the Unity of the Church) IV. "Epistles of Saint John", Catholic Encyclopedia.

oremus.org

bible.oremus.org

John 7:53–8:11

researchgate.net

Garcia Pinilla, Ignacio (2017). Reconsidering the Relationship between the Complutensian Polyglot Bible and Erasmus' Novum Testamentum in Erasmus' Edition of the New Testament. Basel: Mohr Siebeck. p. 70. Retrieved 31 May 2023.

restitutio.org

Finnegan, Sean (2015-12-08). "The Story Behind The Comma Johanneum (1 John 5.7)". Restitutio. Retrieved 2024-07-05.

rice.edu

galileo.rice.edu

"The Galileo Project". galileo.rice.edu.

tbsbibles.org

"Erasmus's 1527 New Testament - Trinitarian Bible Society". www.tbsbibles.org.
"The Received Text".
"Statement of Doctrine of Holy Scripture".
"Why John 7.53–8.11 is in the Bible - Trinitarian Bible Society". www.tbsbibles.org. Retrieved 2024-02-13.

textandcanon.org

Heide, Martin (2023-02-07). "Erasmus and the Search for the Original Text of the New Testament". Text & Canon Institute. Retrieved 2024-02-08.
Jr, James Snapp (2022-06-01). "A Case for the Longer Ending of Mark by James Snapp". Text & Canon Institute. Retrieved 2024-02-03.
Head, Peter M. (2022-06-14). "A Case against the Longer Ending of Mark by Peter Head". Text & Canon Institute. Retrieved 2024-02-03.

textus-receptus.com

"D. A. Waite".

theaquilareport.com

"What is the Preservation of Scripture?". theaquilareport.com. Retrieved 2024-07-01.

thescripturealone.com

H. J. de Jonge, Erasmus and the Comma Johanneum, Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses (1980), p. 385 Archived 2014-09-03 at the Wayback Machine

ubbcluj.ro

sacrascripta.reviste.ubbcluj.ro

Karavidopoulos, Ioannes D. "THE ECUMENICAL PATRIARCHATE'S 1904 NEW TESTAMENT EDITION AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

web.archive.org

H. J. de Jonge, Erasmus and the Comma Johanneum, Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses (1980), p. 385 Archived 2014-09-03 at the Wayback Machine
Michael D. Marlowe states:[1] yet it differs from the Received Text in about a thousand places, most of them being trivial. while Daniel B. Wallace [2] Archived 2007-08-05 at the Wayback Machine has counted 1,838 differences between it and the Textus Receptus.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Payne, Philip B.; Canart, Paul (2000). "The Originality of Text-Critical Symbols in Codex Vaticanus". Novum Testamentum. 42 (2): 105–113. doi:10.1163/156853600506799. ISSN 0048-1009. JSTOR 1561327.