The Babylon Bee (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "The Babylon Bee" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
1,765th place
1,083rd place
5th place
5th place
944th place
678th place
1,029th place
657th place
2,186th place
1,287th place
7th place
7th place
1,230th place
680th place
140th place
115th place
146th place
110th place
34th place
27th place
2,002nd place
1,199th place
1,698th place
987th place
476th place
282nd place
3,811th place
2,160th place
41st place
34th place
3,074th place
1,678th place
599th place
369th place
453rd place
267th place
low place
low place
low place
8,085th place
254th place
236th place
228th place
158th place
259th place
188th place
low place
7,045th place
484th place
323rd place
1,303rd place
808th place
36th place
33rd place
928th place
651st place
49th place
47th place
8,349th place
4,860th place
12th place
11th place
4,404th place
2,623rd place
1,368th place
793rd place
1,427th place
792nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
79th place
65th place
269th place
201st place
152nd place
120th place
99th place
77th place
474th place
329th place
13th place
12th place
9th place
13th place
7,441st place
3,992nd place
2,003rd place
1,161st place
low place
low place
2,728th place
1,571st place
low place
low place
low place
6,384th place
low place
7,648th place
312th place
197th place
129th place
89th place
54th place
48th place
6,694th place
4,043rd place
9,323rd place
4,970th place
2,042nd place
1,127th place
5,477th place
3,008th place
2,736th place
1,514th place
105th place
79th place
619th place
379th place

abcnews4.com

adflegal.org

amazon.com

apnews.com

baltimoresun.com

bloomberg.com

businessinsider.com

businessinsider.com

markets.businessinsider.com

buzzfeednews.com

christianitytoday.com

christianpost.com

chron.com

cincinnati.com

communicationslitigationtoday.com

courtlistener.com

crosswalk.com

dailywire.com

dallasobserver.com

deseret.com

economist.com

  • "As Christian conservatives take to satire, the left is not amused". The Economist. January 22, 2022. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved January 24, 2023. But it does not spare the right. In 2019 it poked fun at Donald Trump for boasting that he had "done more for Christianity than Jesus". The article went viral, leading Snopes, a fact-checking outfit, to label it as satire after some people believed it was a real story. Then, last September, Mr Trump actually said in an interview: "Nobody has done more for Christianity, or for evangelicals, or for religion itself than I have." The Bee now frequently tweets its original satire side by side with a real media headline that fulfilled it.

forbes.com

foxnews.com

gizmodo.com

independent.co.uk

lawandcrime.com

mailchi.mp

marketwatch.com

montgomeryadvertiser.com

nationalreview.com

ncregister.com

newsweek.com

newyorker.com

nytimes.com

palmbeachpost.com

politico.com

poynter.org

publishersweekly.com

reason.com

relevantmagazine.com

reuters.com

slate.com

sltrib.com

snopes.com

splcenter.org

  • Newton, Creede and Squire, Megan (November 19, 2024). "Inside the Beehive". Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved November 21, 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

supremecourt.gov

techdirt.com

theatlantic.com

thebulwark.com

theconversation.com

theguardian.com

thehill.com

townhall.com

usatoday.com

usatoday.com

content-static.usatoday.com

variety.com

vox.com

washingtonexaminer.com

washingtonpost.com

washingtontimes.com

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

wsj.com

  • Mann, Kyle (August 21, 2021). "A 'Fact Checker' Declares War On Satire". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on February 16, 2021. Retrieved January 24, 2023. In response our CEO, Seth Dillon, instructed our lawyers to demand an edit of the article and appealed to the public on social media. The scolds at Snopes seemed to comply and removed the worst bits from their piece. But they then rolled out a new rating, "Labeled Satire," which is meant to suggest that we are somehow making jokes in bad faith. Here's the explanation of the new rating: "Not all content described by its creator or audience as 'satire' necessarily constitutes satire, and this rating does not make a distinction between 'real' satire and content that may not be effectively recognized or understood as satire despite being labeled as such."

x.com

youtube.com