The Design Revolution (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "The Design Revolution" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

1books.google.com

3^rd place

3^rd place

1wikisource.org

27^th place

51^st place

1dissentfromdarwin.org

low place

low place

9,065^th place

7,557^th place

1web.archive.org

1^st place

1^st place

low place

low place

1talkreason.org

low place

low place

aaas.org

See: 1) List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design 2) Kitzmiller v. Dover page 83. The Discovery Institute's Dissent From Darwin Petition has been signed by about 500 scientists. The AAAS, the largest association of scientists in the U.S., has 120,000 members, and firmly rejects intelligent design and denies that there is a legitimate scientific controversy. More than 70,000 Australian scientists and educators condemn teaching of intelligent design in school science classes. List of statements from scientific professional organizations Archived 2008-03-28 at the Wayback Machine on the status intelligent design and other forms of creationism.

books.google.com

Dembski, William A. (13 January 2004). The Design Revolution, Preface p 20. ISBN 9780830832163.

dissentfromdarwin.org

See: 1) List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design 2) Kitzmiller v. Dover page 83. The Discovery Institute's Dissent From Darwin Petition has been signed by about 500 scientists. The AAAS, the largest association of scientists in the U.S., has 120,000 members, and firmly rejects intelligent design and denies that there is a legitimate scientific controversy. More than 70,000 Australian scientists and educators condemn teaching of intelligent design in school science classes. List of statements from scientific professional organizations Archived 2008-03-28 at the Wayback Machine on the status intelligent design and other forms of creationism.

ncseweb.org

See: 1) List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design 2) Kitzmiller v. Dover page 83. The Discovery Institute's Dissent From Darwin Petition has been signed by about 500 scientists. The AAAS, the largest association of scientists in the U.S., has 120,000 members, and firmly rejects intelligent design and denies that there is a legitimate scientific controversy. More than 70,000 Australian scientists and educators condemn teaching of intelligent design in school science classes. List of statements from scientific professional organizations Archived 2008-03-28 at the Wayback Machine on the status intelligent design and other forms of creationism.

talkreason.org

The design revolution? How William Dembski Is Dodging Questions About Intelligent Design, Mark Perakh, "We don't see in that index the following names: Rich Baldwin, Eli Chiprout, Taner Edis, Ellery Eels, Branden Fitelson, Philip Kitcher, Peter Milne, Massimo Pigliucci, Del Ratzsch, Jeff Shallit, Niall Shanks, Jordan H. Sobel, Jason Rosenhouse, Christopher Stephenson, Richard Wein, and Matt Young. All these writers have analyzed in detail Dembski's literary output and demonstrated multiple errors, fallacious concepts and inconsistencies which are a trademark of his prolific production."

web.archive.org

See: 1) List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design 2) Kitzmiller v. Dover page 83. The Discovery Institute's Dissent From Darwin Petition has been signed by about 500 scientists. The AAAS, the largest association of scientists in the U.S., has 120,000 members, and firmly rejects intelligent design and denies that there is a legitimate scientific controversy. More than 70,000 Australian scientists and educators condemn teaching of intelligent design in school science classes. List of statements from scientific professional organizations Archived 2008-03-28 at the Wayback Machine on the status intelligent design and other forms of creationism.

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

See: 1) List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design 2) Kitzmiller v. Dover page 83. The Discovery Institute's Dissent From Darwin Petition has been signed by about 500 scientists. The AAAS, the largest association of scientists in the U.S., has 120,000 members, and firmly rejects intelligent design and denies that there is a legitimate scientific controversy. More than 70,000 Australian scientists and educators condemn teaching of intelligent design in school science classes. List of statements from scientific professional organizations Archived 2008-03-28 at the Wayback Machine on the status intelligent design and other forms of creationism.