The Gospel According to St. Matthew (film) (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "The Gospel According to St. Matthew (film)" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
191st place
148th place
772nd place
849th place
14th place
14th place
5,834th place
4,725th place
4,539th place
2,858th place
789th place
2,161st place
327th place
228th place
low place
low place
12th place
11th place
16th place
23rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,051st place
3,281st place
133rd place
102nd place
29th place
29th place
426th place
292nd place
7th place
7th place

alaska.edu

uashome.alaska.edu

archive.today

artsandfaith.com

auckland.ac.nz

arts.auckland.ac.nz

bafta.org

awards.bafta.org

  • "BAFTA Awards: Film in 1968". British Academy of Film and Television Arts. Retrieved 26 January 2016. for the best Film embodying one or more of the principles of the United Nations Charter in 1968

bbfc.co.uk

  • "THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO MATTHEW (U)". British Board of Film Classification. 4 November 1964. Retrieved 30 December 2012.

cinemaseekers.com

coe.int

lumiere.obs.coe.int

imdb.com

lastampa.it

vaticaninsider.lastampa.it

nostalghia.com

  • Aleksandr Lipkov; Robert Bird (1 February 1967). "The Passion According to Andrei: An Unpublished Interview with Andrei Tarkovsky". nostalghia.com. Literaturnoe obozrenie 1988, University of Chicago. pp. 74–80. Retrieved 22 March 2024. Interviewer: "What do you think about Pasolini's Gospel according to Matthew? That's also a kind of historical film." Tarkovsky: "Of course. I like the picture. I like it precisely because its director did not succumb to the temptation of interpreting the Bible. The Bible has been interpreted for two thousand years and no one can reach unanimous agreement. So Pasolini did not set himself this task, he just left the thing in the form in which it was born. Many feel that the image of a militant cruel Christ was made up by the author of the film. Not true! Read the Gospels and you will see that this was a cruel, cantankerous, irreconcilable man. Moreover with what genius was it written! On the one hand he's God and the Church has been relying on him for two thousand years, but he succumbs to doubt in the garden of Gethsemane. What could be simpler than to call for help from his father and avoid dying on the cross, but he doesn't do this. He is all back-to-front..."

nytimes.com

movies.nytimes.com

rogerebert.com

rottentomatoes.com

suntimes.com

rogerebert.suntimes.com

theguardian.com

usccb.org

old.usccb.org

web.archive.org