The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
70th place
63rd place
6th place
6th place
26th place
20th place
11th place
8th place
18th place
17th place
179th place
183rd place
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
12th place
11th place
low place
low place
102nd place
76th place
5th place
5th place
3rd place
3rd place
3,169th place
1,838th place
702nd place
520th place
low place
low place
1,476th place
1,056th place
121st place
142nd place
9th place
13th place
1,698th place
987th place

academia.edu

archive.org

books.google.com

chronicle.com

doi.org

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

jstor.org

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

miamioh.edu

units.miamioh.edu

nationalreview.com

philarchive.org

pitt.edu

philsci-archive.pitt.edu

robertfulford.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

  • Bird 2013. Bird, Alexander (2013). "Thomas Kuhn". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved September 23, 2017.
  • Longino 2002. Longino, Helen (April 12, 2002). "The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford University. Retrieved July 19, 2023.

theguardian.com

upenn.edu

garfield.library.upenn.edu

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

youtube.com

  • Kuhn, Thomas; Baltas, Aristides; Gavroglu, Kostas; Kindi, Vassiliki (October 1995). A Discussion with Thomas S. Kuhn (Interview). Athens. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. I would now argue very strongly that the Darwinian metaphor at the end of the book is right, and should have been taken more seriously than it was – and nobody took it seriously.