Theory (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Theory" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
155th place
138th place
6th place
6th place
2,128th place
1,553rd place
741st place
577th place
11th place
8th place
1st place
1st place
9,785th place
9,347th place
1,578th place
1,521st place
551st place
406th place
287th place
321st place
209th place
191st place
low place
low place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
9,065th place
7,557th place
207th place
136th place
1,190th place
959th place
3rd place
3rd place

aaas.org

amnh.org

aom.org

journals.aom.org

archive.org

books.google.com

catchword.com

doi.org

etymonline.com

livescience.com

medium.com

merriam-webster.com

nap.edu

princeton.edu

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

sunysb.edu

geo.sunysb.edu

  • Schafersman, Steven D. "An Introduction to Science".

tufts.edu

perseus.tufts.edu

  • See for example Hippocrates Praeceptiones, Part 1. Archived 12 September 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  • The LSJ cites two passages of Aristotle as examples, both from the Metaphysics and involving the definition of natural science: 11.1064a17, "it is clear that natural science (φυσικὴν ἐπιστήμην) must be neither practical (πρακτικὴν) nor productive (ποιητικὴν), but speculative (θεωρητικὴν)" and 6.1025b25, "Thus if every intellectual activity [διάνοια] is either practical or productive or speculative (θεωρητική), physics (φυσικὴ) will be a speculative [θεωρητική] science." So Aristotle actually made a three way distinction between practical, theoretical and productive or technical—or between doing, contemplating or making. All three types involve thinking, but are distinguished by what causes the objects of thought to move or change.

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org