Thomas Hoo, Baron Hoo and Hastings (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Thomas Hoo, Baron Hoo and Hastings" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
6th place
6th place
3rd place
3rd place
441st place
311th place
903rd place
521st place
3,907th place
2,604th place
744th place
547th place
low place
low place
1,234th place
779th place
459th place
360th place
646th place
535th place
485th place
440th place
low place
low place
124th place
544th place
26th place
20th place
8,970th place
5,184th place
1,013th place
739th place
low place
low place

archive.org

  • Cooper, 'The families of Braose and Hoo', at pp. 109-10 (Internet Archive), citing Sussex retinue, Pipe Series, Carlton House Ride MSS.
  • Calendar of the Charter Rolls II: 1257–1300 (HMSO, London 1906), 20 Edward I, m. 5 no. 3, p. 421 (Internet Archive).
  • 'Margaret, daughter and heir of Ralph de Goushull', Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem, VIII: 1336–1347 (HMSO 1913), p. 511: Addenda to vol. V, no 692 (Internet Archive).
  • Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem, III: 1291–1300 (HMSO 1912), pp. 135-38 no. 209-210 (Internet Archive). 'Lands of Peter de Goushill and of Ralph his son', in W. Brown (ed.), Yorkshire Inquisitions of the Reigns of Henry III and Edward I, III, Yorkshire Archaeological Society Records XXXI (1902), pp. 49-50 (Internet Archive).
  • Petition, Norwich 1365, in Liber Introit Civium, Lib.I, fol. 13; translation printed in J. Kirkpatrick, History of the Religious Orders and Communities, and of the Hospitals and Castles of Norwich (Edwards and Hughes, London 1845), pp. 14-16 (Internet Archive).
  • Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem: '420: Nicholas Malemayns', Vol. IX: 1347–1352 (HMSO 1916), pp. 318-19; '79: Thomas de Sancto Omero', Vol. XII: Edward III, 1365–1370 (HMSO 1938), pp. 58-59 (Internet Archive).
  • W.D. Cooper, 'The families of Braose of Chesworth, and Hoo', Sussex Archaeological Collections VIII (London 1856), pp. 97-131, pedigree at pp. 130-31 (Internet Archive). The earlier parts of this pedigree are fictitious: see H. Hall, 'Pedigree of Hoo', Sussex Archaeological Collections XLV (1902), pp. 186-97 (Internet Archive).
  • Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward III, A.D. 1333–1337 (HMSO 1898), p. 523 (Internet Archive); Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward III, III: 1334–1338 (HMSO 1895), p. 247 (Hathi Trust).
  • F. Blomefield, ed. C. Parkin, An Essay Towards a Topographical History of the County of Norfolk, Revised edition, Vol. VII (William Miller, London 1807), pp. 456-57 (Internet Archive).
  • Browne Willis, The History and Antiquities of the Town, Hundred, and Deanry of Buckingham (Author, London 1755), p. 11 (Internet Archive).
  • Cooper, 'Families of Braose and Hoo', pp. 110-12 (Internet Archive), citing British Library, Cottonian charters, xxix, 32.
  • The XIIIJ year of King Henry VI', Hall's Chronicle: Containing the History of England, during the Reign of Henry the Fourth (etc). (J. Johnson et al., London 1809), p. 179 (Internet Archive). T. Carte, A General History of England, II (Author, London 1750), Book XII, pp. 712-13 (Hathi Trust).
  • T. Rymer, ed. G. Holmes, Foedera, Conventiones, Literae et cujuscunque Acta Publica (3rd edition) Vol. V Part 1 (John Neaulme, Hagae Comitis 1741), p. 115 (Internet Archive).
  • Rymer, Foedera, Vol. V Part 1, pp. 133-36 (Internet Archive); Carte, General History of England, II, Book XII, p. 724 (Hathi Trust).
  • The National Archives (UK), C 139/156/11: recited in Cooper, 'Families of de Braose and Hoo', at pp. 118-19 (Internet Archive).
  • Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry VI Vol. IV: 1441–1446 (HMSO 1908), p. 350 (Internet Archive).
  • E. Venables, 'The Castle of Herstmonceux and its lords', Sussex Archaeological Collections IV, (1851), pp. 125-202, at pp. 150-52 (Internet Archive).
  • 'The Testament of the Lord Hoo', in Cooper, 'Families of Braose and Hoo', pp. 119-21 (Internet Archive).
  • Cooper, 'Families of Braose and Hoo', p. 121 (Internet Archive).
  • Cooper, 'Families of Braose and Hoo', p. 122 (Internet Archive)
  • J.E. Ray, 'The parish church of All Saints, Herstmonceux, and the Dacre tomb', Sussex Archaeological Collections LVIII (1916), pp. 21-64, at pp. 36-55 (Internet Archive).
  • cf. Harleian MS 381, item 41, at Catalogus Librorum MSS Bibliothecae Harlaianae I, p. 229b (Internet Archive). Described by Chauncy, Historical Antiquities of Hertfordshire, p. 511. Chauncy's identification of the marriages of Lord Hoo's parents and grandparents is correct, but the punctuation of his original edition, in describing the different coats in the Keate MS, may have given rise to confusion. It is more clearly printed in the 1826 edition, Vol. II, pp. 405-06 (Google).
  • Cooper, 'Families of Braose and Hoo', pp. 126-27 (Internet Archive).
  • A.B. Beavan, The Aldermen of the City of London Temp. Henry III to 1912 (Corporation of the City of London, 1913), II, p. 10.
  • Cooper, 'Families of Braose and Hoo', p. 119 note 83 (Internet Archive), citing College of Arms MS J. vij. fol. 61.

bl.uk

bnf.fr

gallica.bnf.fr

  • F. Du-Chesne, Histoire des Chanceliers et Gardes des Sceaux de France (L'Autheur, avec privilege du Roy, Paris 1680), pp. 448-49 (BnF Gallica).

books.google.com

  • D. Richardson, ed. K.G. Everingham, Magna Carta Ancestry, 2nd Edn (2011), I, p. 498 (Ufford).
  • H. Chauncy, The Historical Antiquities of Hertfordshire (B. Griffin, S. Keble, D. Browne, D. Midwinter and T. Leigh, London 1700), 'The Mannor of Hoo', pp. 510-11 (Google), in confusion accords a Felton marriage to both Sir Thomases, father and son: Blomefield (1769), thus misled, misses out a generation between Sir William Hoo and Lord Hoo and Hastings, making the two Sir Thomases into one person, and making Baron Hoo first to marry his own mother. The mistake goes back to Dugdale's Baronage.
  • That Elizabeth Echyngham was the second wife of Sir Thomas Hoo the father (who died 1420), see D. Richardson ed. K. Everingham, Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 2nd Edition (2011), III, p. 18 item 9; Thomas the younger son is named explicitly in various sources as the brother of Sir Thomas Baron Hoo, e.g. in the 1445 concord with Lionel Welles, cf. Feet of Fines, CP 25/1/293/71, no. 308. View original at AALT; at which time his mother Elizabeth was still living.
  • D. Richardson ed. K. Everingham, Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 2nd Edition (2011), III, p. 18 item 9. (Lewknor).
  • Sir Thomas, who lived down to c. 1380, and his son William received letters of protection to serve beyond the sea with the Prince of Wales in autumn 1359, see C.P. Cooper (ed.), Chronological Catalogue of the Materials Transcribed for a New Edition of Rymer's Foedera (Commissioners/Record Office, 1869), pp. 47-48 (Google).
  • H. Nicolas, Proceedings and ordinances of the Privy Council of England, Vol. I: 10 Richard II to 11 Henry IV (Commissioners, Westminster 1834), p. 183 (Google).
  • N.H. Nicolas, Testamenta Vetusta, 2 vols (Nichols and Son, London 1826), I, pp. 207-11 (Google).
  • The Latin text of the Patent is transcribed in full in Report on the Dignity of a Peer of the Realm, Vol. V: Fifth Report, and Appendix (Commissioners, Westminster 1829), p. 266 (Google).
  • Cooper's transcript is more complete than 'Abstract of Will of Thomas Lord Hoo and Hastings', in N.H. Nicolas, Testamenta Vetusta (Nichols & Son, London 1826), I, pp. 272-74.
  • cf. Harleian MS 381, item 41, at Catalogus Librorum MSS Bibliothecae Harlaianae I, p. 229b (Internet Archive). Described by Chauncy, Historical Antiquities of Hertfordshire, p. 511. Chauncy's identification of the marriages of Lord Hoo's parents and grandparents is correct, but the punctuation of his original edition, in describing the different coats in the Keate MS, may have given rise to confusion. It is more clearly printed in the 1826 edition, Vol. II, pp. 405-06 (Google).
  • Chauncy, Historical Antiquities of Hertfordshire, pp. 404-06 (Google).
  • Richardson IV 2011, pp. 305–11. Richardson, Douglas (2011). Everingham, Kimball G. (ed.). Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families. Vol. IV (2nd ed.). Salt Lake City. pp. 320–1. ISBN 978-1-4609-9270-8. Retrieved 14 September 2013.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  • D. Richardson, ed. K.G. Everingham, Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 2nd edn., 4 vols (Salt Lake City, 2011), IV, at pp. 310 (Google).
  • Chauncy, The Historical Antiquities of Hertfordshire, pp. 510-11 (Google).
  • The names of the two Annes, Eleanor and Elizabeth are plainly recited with their husbands' names in Boleyn v Hoo, The National Archives, Early Chancery Proceedings, C 1/2/82-85. Full transcripts in J.W. Bayley (ed.), Calenders to the Proceedings in Chancery during the Reign of Queen Elizabeth, to which are prefixed examples of earlier proceedings in that court, Vol. II (Commissioners, Westminster, 1830), 'King Edward IV': pp. li-liii (Google). View originals at AALT. See also the suit Boleyn v Echyngham in De Banco rolls, CP 40/829 (Michaelmas 8 Edward IV), m. 606 front and dorse; originals at AALT, m. 606 front a and b, and 606 dorse.
  • A Pedigree of Hoo and Copley was attempted by E. Cartwright, The Parochial History of the Rape of Bramber in the Western Division of the County of Sussex, Vol. II Part 2 (J.B. Nichols and Son, London 1830), pp. 339-40 (Google). It contains some inaccuracies.
  • Richardson, Magna Carta Ancestry (2011), IV, pp. 310-11. (Welles)
  • Richardson IV 2011, p. 311. Richardson, Douglas (2011). Everingham, Kimball G. (ed.). Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families. Vol. IV (2nd ed.). Salt Lake City. pp. 320–1. ISBN 978-1-4609-9270-8. Retrieved 14 September 2013.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

british-history.ac.uk

  • 'Inquisitions post mortem: Richard II, File 14, nos. 339-343 – Thomas de Felton', in M.C.B. Dawes, A.C. Wood and D.H. Gifford, Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem: Volume 15, Richard II (HMSO, London 1970), pp. 134-49 (British History Online).
  • 'Parishes: Offley', in W. Page (ed.), A History of the County of Hertford, Vol. 3 (VCH, London 1912), pp. 39-44 (British History Online).
  • 'Luton' (manors of Luton Hoo and Stopsley), in W. Page (ed.), A History of the County of Bedford, Vol. 2 (V.C.H., London 1908), pp. 348-75 (British History Online).
  • 'Parishes: Knebworth', in W. Page (ed.), A History of the County of Hertford, Vol. 3 (V.C.H., London 1912), pp. 111-18 (British History Online).
  • 'Parishes: Offley', W. Page (ed.), A History of the County of Hertford, Vol. 3, ed. William Page (London, 1912), pp. 39-44 (British History Online).
  • For this branch of Malmaynes see 'Parishes: Pagham, Manor of Aldwick' in L.F. Salzman (ed.), A History of the County of Sussex, Vol. IV: The Rape of Chichester (V.C.H., London 1953), pp. 227-33 (British History Online). This account avoids unsupported inferences found elsewhere.
  • See also T. Rymer, Foedera Vol. XI (Apud Joannem Neulme, London 1739–1745), pp. 57-67 and pp. 88-108 (British History Online). Calendar of the Close Rolls, Henry VI, IV: 1441–1447 (HMSO 1937), p. 232-34 (Hathi Trust).

familysearch.org

  • G.E. Cokayne (ed.), The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom, extant, extinct, or dormant, 2nd edition (London 1926), VI, pp. 561-67 (Family search viewer - registration required) (site accessed 10 May 2023).

flickr.com

geograph.org.uk

s0.geograph.org.uk

hathitrust.org

babel.hathitrust.org

  • Illingworth and J. Caley (eds), Placita de Quo Warranto temporibus Edw. I, II & III (Commissioners, Westminster 1818), p. 103 (Hathi Trust), Rot. 29.
  • Calendar of Close Rolls, Edward III, A.D. 1333–1337 (HMSO 1898), p. 523 (Internet Archive); Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward III, III: 1334–1338 (HMSO 1895), p. 247 (Hathi Trust).
  • '336. Inquisition to find the ages of Elizabeth and Alice, daughters of Thomas de Sancto Omero, two of the heirs of Nicholas de Malemayns', Calendar of Inquisitions post mortem X: 1352–1361 (HMSO 1921), pp. 289-90 (Hathi Trust).
  • F. Blomefield, ed. C. Parkin, An Essay Towards a Topographical History of the County of Norfolk, Revised edition, Vol. V (William Miller, London 1806), at pp. 75-79; VII (1807), pp. 219-20, and pp. 456-57 (Hathi Trust).
  • For the Wychingham family, see 'Wychingham's manor, Witchingham' in F. Blomefield, ed. C. Parkin, An Essay Towards a Topographical History of the County of Norfolk, Revised edition, Vol. VIII (William Miller, London 1808), at pp. 298-300 (Hathi Trust). Blomefield does not mention the Hoo-Wychyngham marriage here, but does so at Vol. V, p. 77.
  • The XIIIJ year of King Henry VI', Hall's Chronicle: Containing the History of England, during the Reign of Henry the Fourth (etc). (J. Johnson et al., London 1809), p. 179 (Internet Archive). T. Carte, A General History of England, II (Author, London 1750), Book XII, pp. 712-13 (Hathi Trust).
  • Rymer, Foedera, Vol. V Part 1, pp. 133-36 (Internet Archive); Carte, General History of England, II, Book XII, p. 724 (Hathi Trust).
  • See also T. Rymer, Foedera Vol. XI (Apud Joannem Neulme, London 1739–1745), pp. 57-67 and pp. 88-108 (British History Online). Calendar of the Close Rolls, Henry VI, IV: 1441–1447 (HMSO 1937), p. 232-34 (Hathi Trust).
  • J. Anstis 'A Supplement to Mr Ashmole's History touching Garter King of Arms', The Register of the Most Noble Order of the Garter, 2 Vols (John Barber, London 1724), I (Introductory volume), pp. 338-39 (Hathi Trust).
  • Calendar of the Close Rolls, Henry VI, IV: 1441–1447 (HMSO 1937), p. 172 (Hathi Trust).
  • J. Anstis, The Register of the Most Noble Order of the Garter 2 Vols (John Barber, London 1724), I (Introductory volume), p. 38; II (Text volume), pp. 129-31, and see note "n" at p. 145 (Hathi Trust, which reverses the volume numeration).
  • Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry VI, Vol. V: 1446–1452 (HMSO 1909), p. 165 (Hathi Trust).
  • Calendar of Patent Rolls, Henry VI, Vol. V: 1446–1452, pp. 435, 439, 444 (Hathi Trust).
  • Calendar of Patent Rolls, Edward IV, Vol. I: 1461–1467 (HMSO 1897), pp. 137-38 (Hathi Trust).

jstor.org

  • L.L. Williams, 'A Rouen Book of Hours of the Sarum Use, c. 1444, belonging to Thomas, Lord Hoo, Chancellor of Normandy and France', Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy: Archaeology, Culture, History, Literature, Vol. LXXV (1975), pp. 189-212 (Jstor – Sign-in required).

medievalgenealogy.org.uk

  • Two seals are engraved in Cooper, 'Families of Braose and Hoo': others are shown in the Medieval Genealogy website, including a charter of 1366 with seals of Sir William de Hoo and Dame Alicia (St Omer) de Hoo [1], and a grant of 1372 Huntington Library, San Marino BA v.48/1464 with seals of Sir Thomas de Hoo and Isabella (St Leger) de Hoo.

nationalarchives.gov.uk

discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk

  • He declared his last will on 16 May 1482: The National Archive, ref. C 131/99/8.
  • See Graystok v Goldesburgh, The National Archives, Early Chancery Proceedings C 1/137/14, Summary at Discovery.
  • The Fiennes marriage is said to be evidenced in T.N.A. Early Chancery Proceedings, Fenys v Fayrefax, C 1/254/16 Summary at Discovery.
  • The National Archives (UK), Discovery Catalogue, ref. C 1/41/239 (1467–72).

norfolkstainedglass.co.uk

oup.com

academic.oup.com

  • A. Goodman, 'Sir Thomas Hoo and the Parliament of 1376', Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research XLI (1968), pp. 139-49 (open pdf available at oxfordacademic).

thekeep.info

  • The relationship is shown thus in the Hoo pedigree given by G. Elliott, 'A monumental palimpsest: the Dacre tomb in Herstmonceux church', Sussex Archaeological Collections 148 (2010), at p. 141. (Read at thekeep.info pdf). By a typographer's error, Elizabeth's surname "Etchingham" is mistakenly printed beneath the name of Sir Thomas de Hoo (died 1420).
  • G. Elliott, 'A monumental palimpsest: the Dacre tomb in Herstmonceux church', Sussex Archaeological Collections 148 (2010), pp 129-44. (Read at thekeep.info pdf).

uh.edu

aalt.law.uh.edu

  • That Elizabeth Echyngham was the second wife of Sir Thomas Hoo the father (who died 1420), see D. Richardson ed. K. Everingham, Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 2nd Edition (2011), III, p. 18 item 9; Thomas the younger son is named explicitly in various sources as the brother of Sir Thomas Baron Hoo, e.g. in the 1445 concord with Lionel Welles, cf. Feet of Fines, CP 25/1/293/71, no. 308. View original at AALT; at which time his mother Elizabeth was still living.
  • Feet of Fines, CP 25/1/293/71, no. 308. View original at AALT.
  • The National Archives (UK), Early Chancery Proceedings, C 1/26/118. View original at AALT.
  • The National Archives (UK), Early Chancery Proceedings, C 1/44/187. View original at AALT.
  • So stated by Thomas Hoo in his Answer to the Bill of James Carrue and Eleanor, The National Archives, Early Chancery Proceedings C 1/44/186 item 2. View original at AALT. Hoo specifies that the elder Eleanor is the mother to the three daughters Eleanor Echingham, Anne Copley and Elizabeth Massyngberd.
  • The names of the two Annes, Eleanor and Elizabeth are plainly recited with their husbands' names in Boleyn v Hoo, The National Archives, Early Chancery Proceedings, C 1/2/82-85. Full transcripts in J.W. Bayley (ed.), Calenders to the Proceedings in Chancery during the Reign of Queen Elizabeth, to which are prefixed examples of earlier proceedings in that court, Vol. II (Commissioners, Westminster, 1830), 'King Edward IV': pp. li-liii (Google). View originals at AALT. See also the suit Boleyn v Echyngham in De Banco rolls, CP 40/829 (Michaelmas 8 Edward IV), m. 606 front and dorse; originals at AALT, m. 606 front a and b, and 606 dorse.

umich.edu

quod.lib.umich.edu

  • T. Fuller, The History of the Worthies of England (Thomas Williams, London 1662), 'Bedfordshire: Memorable persons: Sheriffs of Bedford and Buckinghamshire: Henry VI', p. 124 (Umich/eebo).
  • W. Dugdale, The Baronage of England (Abel Roper, John Martin and Henry Herringman, London 1675–1676), 'Lord Hoo and Hasting' at pp. 233-34 (Umich/eebo). Dugdale's article, a bold attempt, contains various confusions. Fuller and Dugdale list the same husbands for the daughters, suggesting the shared origin of the mistake.