Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Thomas Weinandy" in English language version.
I think one of the real issues here, which he doesn't get at, is a generation gap, and a gap of which I am a part.
The book... examines the final week of Jesus' earthly life and the historical and theological questions surrounding his death.
Book 'employs standards from outside the faith,' the doctrine committee asserts. Publisher expects controversy to generate more sales.
In what appears to be a reconciliatory move by the U.S. bishops' Committee on Doctrine towards church scholars who took issue with the committee's sharp critique of a book by a prominent Fordham University theologian, the committee executive director has written it never meant to question the 'dedication, honor, creativity, or service' of the author.
Weinandy strongly defended the idea that a Catholic theologian should have a mandate, or license, from the local bishop.
God isn't dead. His server may be down though.
Catholics still must go to a priest for absolution.
Because rational intelligence and freedom exceed material scientific laws, and thus the laws of material evolution, Catholics hold that God must be instrumental in the course of human origins.
The Higgs particle is now arguably more relevant than God.
The members of the dialogue discovered that there are many more convergences than divergences, even on the issue of the nature of the presence of Christ in the Eucharist.
Like the discovery of the Higgs particle, evolution involved scientific discovery seemingly stepping into territory reserved for God in the Genesis creation accounts.
