Time bomb (software) (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Time bomb (software)" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
4,347th place
3,017th place
1,631st place
1,239th place
153rd place
151st place
1st place
1st place
low place
low place

adobe.com (Global: 1,631st place; English: 1,239th place)

partners.adobe.com

adobe.com

  • "Adobe Elements 2025 Family". www.adobe.com. Retrieved 2025-06-20. The license enables you to use Photoshop Elements & Premiere Elements for a full 3-year term. It's a one-time purchase with no additional fees. The license is non-renewing — it expires 3 years after redemption. When your 3-year term license expires, the Photoshop Elements Editor and Premiere Elements Editor will no longer be accessible. However, you'll still be able to access your media catalog in the Elements Organizer indefinitely.

digitalcameraworld.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

microsoft.com (Global: 153rd place; English: 151st place)

oreilly.com (Global: 4,347th place; English: 3,017th place)

  • Williams, Sam (March 2002). "Free as in Freedom – Richard Stallman's Crusade for Free Software". O'Reilly. Retrieved 2008-09-26. In 1979, Reid made the decision to sell Scribe to a Pittsburgh-area software company called Unilogic. His graduate-student career ending, Reid says he simply was looking for a way to unload the program on a set of developers that would take pains to keep it from slipping into the public domain. To sweeten the deal, Reid also agreed to insert a set of time-dependent functions- "time bombs" in software-programmer parlance-that deactivated freely copied versions of the program after a 90-day expiration date. To avoid deactivation, users paid the software company, which then issued a code that disabled the internal time-bomb feature.
  • Williams, Sam (March 2002). "Free as in Freedom – Richard Stallman's Crusade for Free Software". O'Reilly. Retrieved 2008-09-26. For Reid, the deal was a win-win. Scribe didn't fall into the public domain, and Unilogic recouped on its investment. For Stallman, it was a betrayal of the programmer ethos, pure and simple. Instead of honoring the notion of share-and-share alike, Reid had inserted a way for companies to compel programmers to pay for information access.

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)