Timeline of disability rights in the United States (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Timeline of disability rights in the United States" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
696th place
428th place
3rd place
3rd place
7th place
7th place
4th place
4th place
2nd place
2nd place
4,010th place
2,209th place
8,598th place
4,874th place
28th place
26th place
1,478th place
868th place
8,749th place
6,545th place
34th place
27th place
6th place
6th place
low place
low place
152nd place
120th place
4,919th place
2,808th place
7,147th place
3,830th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6,260th place
low place
low place
5,477th place
3,008th place
low place
low place
14th place
14th place
446th place
308th place
low place
8,574th place
1,360th place
845th place
7,096th place
4,044th place
332nd place
246th place
41st place
34th place
580th place
462nd place
92nd place
72nd place
1,047th place
1,015th place
low place
low place
59th place
45th place
low place
low place
8,440th place
4,530th place
11th place
8th place
2,917th place
1,621st place
low place
low place
6,019th place
3,951st place
low place
low place
730th place
468th place
424th place
310th place
low place
low place
881st place
611th place
low place
low place
918th place
556th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
137th place
101st place
9,177th place
5,024th place
115th place
82nd place
619th place
379th place
140th place
115th place
3,618th place
1,954th place
1,349th place
866th place
421st place
263rd place
2,268th place
1,400th place
166th place
121st place
858th place
569th place
low place
low place
8,886th place
5,230th place
179th place
183rd place
3,544th place
1,912th place
low place
7,803rd place
121st place
142nd place
1,174th place
773rd place
485th place
440th place
low place
low place
5,263rd place
3,305th place
low place
low place
2,081st place
1,387th place
415th place
327th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6,211th place
3,772nd place
low place
low place
102nd place
76th place
low place
low place
1,775th place
970th place
low place
low place
6,037th place
3,633rd place
low place
9,280th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,579th place
3,243rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,734th place
1,312th place
low place
low place
low place
9,735th place
low place
low place
703rd place
501st place
484th place
323rd place
low place
low place
1,077th place
761st place
low place
low place
5,482nd place
3,140th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,187th place
1,500th place
7,244th place
4,265th place
low place
9,472nd place
2,650th place
3,409th place
low place
9,153rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,272nd place
1,222nd place
low place
low place
3,654th place
2,142nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,747th place
1,277th place
low place
6,043rd place
529th place
314th place
low place
low place
2,229th place
1,256th place
4,000th place
3,127th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,914th place
1,755th place
low place
low place
2,474th place
1,469th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,999th place
1,355th place
low place
7,491st place
low place
low place
518th place
331st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,107th place
652nd place
95th place
70th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
599th place
369th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,697th place
1,040th place
3,811th place
2,160th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
853rd place
505th place
3,626th place
2,039th place
8,910th place
5,502nd place
6,964th place
3,916th place
346th place
229th place
2,121st place
1,217th place
low place
low place
9,308th place
8,899th place
low place
low place
1,220th place
1,102nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,029th place
657th place
327th place
228th place
2,008th place
1,197th place
22nd place
19th place
6,366th place
3,702nd place
3,018th place
1,865th place
1,392nd place
753rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,324th place
310th place
208th place
low place
low place
2,057th place
1,118th place
8,367th place
4,882nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,077th place
1,648th place
low place
low place
low place
9,132nd place
79th place
65th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,082nd place
48th place
39th place
low place
low place
99th place
77th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,275th place
1,288th place
49th place
47th place
low place
low place
441st place
311th place
886th place
517th place
752nd place
484th place
low place
low place
680th place
412th place
1,857th place
1,076th place
low place
low place
3,040th place
1,970th place
129th place
89th place
20th place
30th place
low place
low place

19.15

207.41.19.15

abilitymagazine.com

academia.edu

access-board.gov

acl.gov

aclu.org

  • "About the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project". American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved January 13, 2015. The Project filed Poe v. Lynchburg Training School on behalf of 8,000 women involuntarily sterilized by a state mental institution in Virginia. In a settlement reached in 1985, the state agreed to inform the women about what had been done to them and to help them get counseling and medical treatment.

ada.gov

adapt.org

allbusiness.com

allgov.com

americanbar.org

americanbar.org

apps.americanbar.org

ancestry.com

freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com

  • "Pensions Enacted by Congress for American Revolutionary War Veterans". RootsWeb. Retrieved 25 September 2017.

apa.org

apnews.com

archive.org

archive.today

archives.gov

obamawhitehouse.archives.gov

arl.org

askjan.org

asu.edu

embryo.asu.edu

athleticbusiness.com

aul.org

autisticadvocacy.org

bailii.org

bbc.com

berkeley.edu

bancroft.berkeley.edu

law.berkeley.edu

sph-publications.berkeley.edu

bismarcktribune.com

bloomberg.com

books.google.com

boston.com

businessinsider.com

ca.gov

leginfo.ca.gov

sd15.senate.ca.gov

cannabiscupwinners.com

casebriefs.com

casemine.com

casetext.com

  • "Casetext". Casetext. Retrieved 2017-07-08.
  • In re Hayes, 93 Wn.2d 228 (1980).
  • P.S. by Harbin v. W.S., 452 N.E.2d 969 (Ind. 1983) (""She felt that due to the pattern that P.S. has shown so far it is very reasonable to feel that P.S. might try to induce bleeding by poking into her vagina or abdomen in an attempt to keep the blood flowing. This, of course, would result in hemorrhaging and infection, and possibly death.").
  • Application of Nilsson, 122 Misc.2d 458 (1983).
  • Motes v. Hall, 251 Ga. 373 (Ga. 1983).
  • Matter of Romero, 790 P.2d 819 (1990) ("An individual who is incompetent to make some decisions is not necessarily incompetent to make all decisions. Moe, 432 N.E.2d at 721; Grady, 426 A.2d at 483. Implicit in our holding in In re A.W. was a recognition that some mentally retarded individuals are competent to grant or withhold consent to sterilization.").
  • Guardianship of K.M., 62 Wn. App. 811 (Wash. Ct. App. 1991).
  • Estate of C.W., 433 Pa.Super. 167 (1994) (". The record is replete with the adverse impact of a pregnancy on C.W., and that pregnancy would be completely negative and perhaps even disastrous. Therefore, the trial judge was correct that C.W.'s best interests require that she be protected against that eventuality.").
  • In re Guardianship of B, 190 Misc.2d 581 (2002) ("Upon applying the standards adopted in Nilsson the court concludes that the standards have been met and that it is in B's best interests to authorize the tubal ligation operation.").

catholicnewsagency.com

cbc.ca

cbslocal.com

newyork.cbslocal.com

cdlib.org

texts.cdlib.org

oac.cdlib.org

ceb.com

online.ceb.com

cengage.com

chicagotribune.com

articles.chicagotribune.com

chron.com

citylimits.org

cms.gov

cciio.cms.gov

cnn.com

cnn.com

sportsillustrated.cnn.com

cobar.org

columbiatribune.com

congress.gov

constitutioncenter.org

  • Kalt, Brian C.; Pozen, David. "The Twenty-fifth Amendment". The Interactive Constitution. Philadelphia, PA: The National Constitution Center. Retrieved July 20, 2018.

core.ac.uk

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

supct.law.cornell.edu

  • Text of Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) is available from: Findlaw  Justia  LII 

courtlistener.com

  • Matter of Truesdell, 313 N.C. 421 (1985).
  • Matter of Guardianship of Matejski, 419 N.W.2d 576 (Iowa 1988).
  • Lulos v. State, 548 N.E.2d 173 (Ind. Ct. App 1990) ("The trial court incorrectly required clear and convincing evidence that a life threatening situation existed. The proper standard of proof requires clear and convincing evidence that the judicially appointed guardian brought the petition for sterilization in good faith and the sterilization is in the best interest of the incompetent adult.").

dailynews.com

denverlibrary.org

history.denverlibrary.org

deseretnews.com

disability.gov

disabilityhistory.org

disabilitymuseum.org

disabilityprideparade.com

disabilityrightsintl.org

disabilityscoop.com

disabled-world.com

docs.google.com

doi.org

dol.gov

dralegal.org

dredf.org

druglibrary.org

eeoc.gov

encyclopediavirginia.org

energy.gov

ehss.energy.gov

  • "Chapter 7: The Studies at Fernald School". ACHRE Report. Retrieved February 7, 2016. It is clear that the doses involved were low and that it is extremely unlikely that any of the children who were used as subjects were harmed as a consequence.

fbi.gov

federalregister.gov

ffslaw.com

findacase.com

ne.findacase.com

findarticles.com

findlaw.com

caselaw.lp.findlaw.com

caselaw.findlaw.com

flyfrontier.com

fofweb.com

fox2detroit.com

foxnews.com

gallaudet.edu

gupress.gallaudet.edu

genome.gov

go.com

abcnews.go.com

govexec.com

govtrack.us

gpo.gov

gpo.gov

frwebgate.access.gpo.gov

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

hathitrust.org

  • Stipulation, Authors Guild v. HathiTrust, Southern District of New York, Case 1:11-cv-06351-NRB Document 182, Filed Jan. 6, 2015.

historians.org

hivlawandpolicy.org

house.gov

uscode.house.gov

hud.gov

portal.hud.gov

idaho.gov

icdd.idaho.gov

illinois.edu

library.illinois.edu

archon.library.illinois.edu

inclusiondaily.com

independentliving.org

insidecounsel.com

insurancenewsnet.com

itodaynews.com

jaapl.org

jamanetwork.com

jdsupra.com

jsonline.com

justia.com

supreme.justia.com

law.justia.com

  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1973-04-23). "Gilbert F. Sieling Sr., Petitioner-appellant, v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison, Respondent-appellee, 478 F.2d 211 (9th Cir. 1973) :: Justia". Law.justia.com. Retrieved 2017-07-08.
  • "In Re Penny N. 120 N.H. 269 (1980)". New Hampshire. Retrieved June 12, 2016. If all of the above procedural requirements have been followed, we hold that a probate judge may permit a sterilization after making specific written findings from clear and convincing evidence, that it is in the best interests of the incapacitated ward, rather than the parents' or the public's convenience, to do so.
  • Matter of Grady, 85 N.J. 235 (1981).
  • "Matter of CDM 627 P.2d 607 (1981)". Supreme Court of Alaska. Retrieved June 13, 2016. This appeal raises the question of whether the superior court has the authority to order the sterilization of a mental incompetent upon petition by the incompetent's legal guardian. We conclude that the superior court, as a court of general jurisdiction, does have the authority to entertain and act upon such a petition. [...] Basic notions of procedural due process require that the incompetent be afforded a full judicial hearing at which medical testimony is presented and the incompetent, through a guardian ad litem, is allowed to present proof and cross-examine witnesses. The advocates of the proposed operation bear the heavy burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that sterilization is in the best interests of the incompetent.
  • Matter of A. W., 637 P.2d 366 (1981) ("Once the district court determines preliminary matters, it must find by clear and convincing evidence that the sterilization is medically essential. A sterilization is medically essential if clearly necessary, in the opinion of experts, to preserve the life or physical or mental health of the mentally retarded person. The term "medically essential" is reasonably precise and provides protection from abuses prevalent in this area in the past. The term also avoids confusion as to whose interests are to be considered. It is not the welfare of society, or the convenience or peace of mind of parents or guardians that these standards are intended to protect. The purpose of the standards is to protect the health of the minor retarded person, and to prevent that person's fundamental procreative rights from being abridged. In some circumstances, the possibility of pregnancy, if supported by sufficient evidence that it would threaten the physical or mental health of the person and that no less intrusive means of birth control would prove safe and effective, could justify granting a petition for sterilization as medically essential.").
  • Poe v. Lynchburg Training School and Hospital, 518 F. Supp. 789 (1981).
  • Matter of Moe, 385 Mass 555 (1982) ("The issues presented seem to us to involve whether an incompetent person is to be given the same rights as those vested in a competent person, and, if so, how and by what means. . . . We find more persuasive the view expressed in most recent decisions that a court of general jurisdiction which has powers of equity over incompetents and their guardians, such as the Probate Court, has the power to hear and adjudicate petitions such as the one in the case at bar. . . . In utilizing the doctrine of substituted judgment, this court seeks to maintain the integrity of the incompetent person by giving the individual a forum in which his or her rights may be exercised. The court dons "the mental mantle of the incompetent" and substitutes itself as nearly as possible for the individual in the decision-making process.").
  • "Ga. Code Ann., § 31–20–3". Retrieved January 9, 2017.
  • In Re Debra B., 495 A.2d 781 (1985).
  • Conservatorship of Valerie N., 40 Cal.3d 143 (1985) ("We conclude that the present legislative scheme, which absolutely precludes the sterilization option, impermissibly deprives developmentally disabled persons of privacy and liberty interests protected by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and article I, section 1 of the California Constitution. ... An incompetent developmentally disabled woman has no less interest in a satisfying or fulfilling life free from the burdens of an unwanted pregnancy than does her competent sister. ... Our conclusion that section 2356, subdivision (d), is constitutionally overbroad, and may not be invoked to deny the probate court authority to grant a conservator the power to consent to sterilization in those cases in which no less intrusive method of contraception is available to a severely retarded conservatee, does not open the way to unrestricted approval of applications for additional powers.").
  • "In re Wirsing, 456 Mich. 467 (1998)". Michigan Supreme Court. Accordingly, we hold that the probate court has jurisdiction to hear an application by a guardian for authorization to consent to an extraordinary procedure under M.C.L. § 330.1629; M.S.A. § 14.800(629), including sterilization, and to order such authorization if it determines the procedure is in the ward's best interests.
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. "United States v. Morin, No. 15-50197 (5th Cir. 2016) :: Justia". Law.justia.com. Retrieved 2017-07-08.

docs.justia.com

cases.justia.com

justice.gov

k12.wa.us

kidstogether.org

koaa.com

latimes.com

latimesblogs.latimes.com

lawandpsychiatry.com

leagle.com

  • "Wentzel v. Montgomery General Hosp., Inc., 293 Md. 685 (1982)". Court of Appeals of Maryland. Retrieved June 15, 2016. We conclude, therefore, that as to incompetent minors circuit courts, acting in pursuance of their inherent parens patriae authority, have subject matter jurisdiction to consider a petition for an order authorizing a guardian to consent to the sterilization of an incompetent minor. [...] In addition to these factors, the trial court, before authorizing sterilization as being in the best interests of the incompetent minor, must find by clear and convincing evidence that the requested operative procedure is medically necessary to preserve the life or physical or mental health of the incompetent minor.
  • "Hangarter V. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co". Leagle.com. Retrieved 2013-09-09.
  • "In re Estate of K.E.J., 382 Ill.App.3d 401 (2008)". Illinois Appellate Court. Retrieved June 13, 2016. First, the party seeking sterilization may demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the ward, if competent, would have wished to be sterilized and would not have objected to the chosen method of sterilization. If the party seeking sterilization can meet this burden after all procedures have been followed and all relevant evidence has been taken into account, then the court may issue an order authorizing sterilization of the ward. The party opposing sterilization can attempt to produce clear and convincing evidence that if the ward were competent, she either (1) would not have wished to be sterilized if she could have foreseen her current situation, or (2) would not have consented to the chosen method of sterilization. If either of these things can be demonstrated, then following the substituted judgment standard provided for in the Probate Act, the ward's wishes prevail and the court should deny the petition for sterilization. No analysis of the ward's best interests is necessary under either of these scenarios. However, if the ward's substituted judgment cannot be proved by clear and convincing evidence either way, then the Probate Act instructs us to proceed to a best interests analysis, following the six Terwilliger factors outlined above. As discussed, the petition for sterilization should be granted if and only if the proponent of the petition can prove it is in the ward's best interests by clear and convincing evidence, when compared to other, less intrusive alternatives currently available to the ward, as well as potential future alternatives that may become available due to scientific or medical advances. If the court concludes, after analysis of all the above factors, that sterilization by the petitioned-for method is proven to be in the ward's best interests by clear and convincing evidence, then a petition authorizing the procedure may issue. Otherwise, the petition must be denied.
  • In re Guardianship of Kennedy, 845 N.W. 707 (2014) ("we hold that section 633.635(2) required Maria to get prior court approval for Stuart's vasectomy.").

lexisnexis.com

litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com

maine.gov

legislature.maine.gov

masscases.com

  • Matter of Moe, 31 Mass. App. Ct. 473 (1991).
  • Guardianship of Mary Moe., 81 Mass. App. Ct. 136 (2012) ("We reverse that portion of the order requiring sterilization of Moe. No party requested this measure, none of the attendant procedural requirements has been met, and the judge appears to have simply produced the requirement out of thin air. We vacate that portion of the order requiring Moe to undergo an abortion. We remand the case for a proper evidentiary inquiry and decision on the issue of substituted judgment.").

mcandrewslaw.com

medicaid.gov

mentalhealthamerica.net

mentalillnesspolicy.org

mhreform.org

miamiherald.com

mindfreedom.org

mit.edu

tech.mit.edu

mn.gov

motherjones.com

mouthmag.com

  • [2] Mouthmag #80, 'Metamorphosis, Interrupted'

museumofdisability.org

myplainview.com

nads.org

namisanmateo.org

natlawreview.com

nbcnews.com

ncjrs.gov

ncld-youth.info

ndrn.org

necn.com

newamerica.org

higheredindex.newamerica.org

news.google.com

newsday.com

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

npaction.org

npr.org

  • "The Black Stork". National Public Radio. Retrieved 2010-11-26. The film was inspired by the sensational case of Dr. Harry Haiselden, a Chicago surgeon who convinced the parents of a newborn with multiple disabilities to let the child die instead of performing surgery that would save its life. In the film, Haiselden actually plays himself, a wise doctor who attends the birth of a child born with congenital syphilis – incurable at the time and a major cause of congenital disabilities. Two other doctors interfere, out of personal pride and misplaced benevolence, and try to convince the woman to save the child's life. The woman is forced to choose.
  • Eyder Peralta (February 21, 2012). "Retired Massachusetts Judge Defends Forced Abortion Ruling". National Public Radio. Retrieved January 22, 2016.

ny.gov

opwdd.ny.gov

nymag.com

nyspsych.org

nytimes.com

nytimes.com

query.nytimes.com

select.nytimes.com

  • "Medical Society's Committee Against Bollinger Baby's Physician". New York Times. December 15, 1915. Retrieved 2010-11-26. Dr. Harry J. Haiselden, who refused to perform an operation on the Bollinger baby because he believed the child would be a hopeless defective, will be expelled from membership in the Chicago Medical Society if the council of that body approves the findings of the Ethical Relations Committee.

nyu.edu

dlib.nyu.edu

omaha.com

oregonlive.com

osd.mil

gulflink.osd.mil

oup.com

oyez.org

paclii.org

peoplewho.org

perfdrive.com

validate.perfdrive.com

pillowangel.org

post-polio.org

propertyinsurancecoveragelaw.com

psychiatry.org

publishersweekly.com

pva.org

qualitymall.org

raggededgemagazine.com

resource.org

law.resource.org

reuters.com

revwarapps.org

rockrivertimes.com

rutgers.edu

lawlibrary.rutgers.edu

scholar.google.com

scotusblog.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

seyfarth.com

sfgate.com

articles.sfgate.com

sfgate.com

spokesman.com

sproutflix.org

ssa.gov

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

  • Kessler, Laura T. (2014-03-30). "'A Sordid Case': Stump v. Sparkman, Judicial Immunity, and the Other Side of Reproductive Rights". Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. SSRN 2417972.

stanford.edu

law.stanford.edu

state.fl.us

leg.state.fl.us

state.ny.us

state.va.us

leg1.state.va.us

courts.state.va.us

state.vt.us

leg.state.vt.us

suntimes.com

blogs.suntimes.com

supremecourt.gov

techlawjournal.com

temple.edu

isc.temple.edu

texastribune.org

thefreelibrary.com

thelegalcenter.org

thenewcivilrightsmovement.com

thetaskforce.org

totseans.com

ua.edu

bama.ua.edu

uiowa.edu

disability.law.uiowa.edu

umd.edu

otal.umd.edu

unum.com

investors.unum.com

usatoday.com

usatoday.com

usatoday30.usatoday.com

usc.edu

law.usc.edu

usconstitution.net

uscourts.gov

ca2.uscourts.gov

ussc.gov

valleymorningstar.com

virginia.gov

law.lis.virginia.gov

vox.com

wa.gov

app.leg.wa.gov

washingtonpost.com

washingtontimes.com

wct-law.com

web.archive.org

wikimedia.org

commons.wikimedia.org

womensrunning.com

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

  • American Bar Association (May 1960). "ABA Journal". American Bar Association Journal. American Bar Association: 499–. ISSN 0747-0088.

wrightslaw.com

wsj.com

blogs.wsj.com