Titian (English Wikipedia)
Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Titian" in English language version.
refsWebsite
Global rank
English rank
983rd place
751st place
1st place
1st place
4,824th place
4,770th place
3rd place
3rd place
489th place
377th place
4,820th place
3,498th place
low place
low place
471st place
409th place
7th place
7th place
34th place
27th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
12th place
11th place
abcgallery.com
- Olga Mataev. "Ecce Homo". Abcgallery.com. Retrieved 30 January 2011.
artbible.info
- "Art and the Bible". Artbible.info. Retrieved 30 January 2011.
artinprint.org
- Schmidt, Suzanne Karr. "Printed Bodies and the Materiality of Early Modern Prints," Archived 24 October 2020 at the Wayback Machine Art in Print Vol. 1 No. 1 (May–June 2011), p. 26.
bbc.co.uk
- "Titian Madonna and Child sells for record $16.9m". BBC News Online. 28 January 2011. Retrieved 30 January 2011.
books.google.com
- Sethre, Janet (8 January 2020). Venice: Souls' Mother and Child. Strategic Book Publishing & Rights Agency. ISBN 9781951530242 – via Google Books.
- Boni, Filippo de' (1840). Biografia degli Artisti, Emporeo biografico metodico, volume unico. Venice: Co' Tipi di Gondolieri. p. 703.
cnrs.fr
merovingio.c2rmf.cnrs.fr
- Scientific images of this painting are available, with explanations, on the website of the French Centre for Research and Restoration of the Museums of France).
colourlex.com
- Pigments used by Titian, ColourLex
getty.edu
- See below; c. 1488/1490 is generally accepted despite claims in his lifetime that he was older, Getty Union Artist Name List and Metropolitan Museum of Art timeline, retrieved 11 February 2009 both use c. 1488. See discussion of the issue below and at When Was Titian Born?, which sets out the evidence, and supports 1477—an unusual view today. Gould (pp. 264–66) also sets out much of the evidence without coming to a conclusion. Charles Hope in Jaffé (p. 11) also discusses the issue, favouring a date "in or just before 1490" as opposed to the much earlier dates, as does Penny (p. 201) "probably in 1490 or a little earlier". The question has become caught up in the still controversial division of works between Giorgione and the young Titian.
gutenberg.org
- Charles Hope, in Jaffé, p. 17 Engraving of the painting
- Montgomery, Lucy. Anne of Green Gables. Pitman.
homestead.com
lafrusta.homestead.com
- "When Was Titian Born?". Lafrusta.homestead.com. 4 November 2002. Retrieved 30 January 2011.
metmuseum.org
- See below; c. 1488/1490 is generally accepted despite claims in his lifetime that he was older, Getty Union Artist Name List and Metropolitan Museum of Art timeline, retrieved 11 February 2009 both use c. 1488. See discussion of the issue below and at When Was Titian Born?, which sets out the evidence, and supports 1477—an unusual view today. Gould (pp. 264–66) also sets out much of the evidence without coming to a conclusion. Charles Hope in Jaffé (p. 11) also discusses the issue, favouring a date "in or just before 1490" as opposed to the much earlier dates, as does Penny (p. 201) "probably in 1490 or a little earlier". The question has become caught up in the still controversial division of works between Giorgione and the young Titian.
- "Titian (ca. 1485/90?–1576)". Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. Metropolitan Museum of Art. October 2003. Retrieved 30 January 2011.
nationalgallery.org.uk
- "Portrait of Gerolamo (?) Barbarigo, about 1510, Titian". National Gallery. Retrieved 26 May 2013.
- "Titian". nationalgallery.org.uk/. Retrieved 26 May 2023.
newadvent.org
Louis Gillet (1913). "Titian". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 30 January 2011.
nytimes.com
- Cotter, Holland (12 August 2021). "Can We Ever Look at Titian's Paintings the Same Way Again?". The New York Times.
theguardian.com
- Carrell, Severin (2 February 2009). "Titian's Diana and Actaeon saved for the nation". The Guardian.
washingtonpost.com
wbur.org
web.archive.org
- See below; c. 1488/1490 is generally accepted despite claims in his lifetime that he was older, Getty Union Artist Name List and Metropolitan Museum of Art timeline, retrieved 11 February 2009 both use c. 1488. See discussion of the issue below and at When Was Titian Born?, which sets out the evidence, and supports 1477—an unusual view today. Gould (pp. 264–66) also sets out much of the evidence without coming to a conclusion. Charles Hope in Jaffé (p. 11) also discusses the issue, favouring a date "in or just before 1490" as opposed to the much earlier dates, as does Penny (p. 201) "probably in 1490 or a little earlier". The question has become caught up in the still controversial division of works between Giorgione and the young Titian.
- Schmidt, Suzanne Karr. "Printed Bodies and the Materiality of Early Modern Prints," Archived 24 October 2020 at the Wayback Machine Art in Print Vol. 1 No. 1 (May–June 2011), p. 26.
wga.hu
- Jaffé No. 1, pp. 74–75 image
