Toe (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Toe" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
4th place
4th place
2nd place
2nd place
1st place
1st place
11th place
8th place
4,380th place
4,305th place
low place
low place
low place
7,180th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
287th place
321st place
387th place
373rd place
3rd place
3rd place
1,160th place
737th place
18th place
17th place

biodiversitylibrary.org (Global: 387th place; English: 373rd place)

  • Hyrtl, J. (1880). Onomatologia Anatomica. Geschichte und Kritik der anatomischen Sprache der Gegenwart. Wien: Wilhelm Braumüller. K.K. Hof- und Universitätsbuchhändler. p. 248–249. online at Biodiversity Library.

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

  • Haeckel, Ernst Heinrich Philipp August (1874). The Evolution of Man. Library of Alexandria. Vol. 1. Library of Alexandria (published 1923). ISBN 9781465548931. Retrieved 31 August 2019. The thorough investigations of Gegenbaur have shown that the fish's fins [...] are many-toed feet. The various cartilaginous or bony radii that are found in large numbers in each fin correspond to the fingers of toes of the higher Vertebrates. The several joints of each fin-radius correspond to the various parts of the toe. Even in the Dipneusta the fin is of the same construction as in the fishes; it was afterwards gradually evolved into the five-toed form, which we first encounter in the Amphibia. The reduction of the number of toes to six, and then to five, probably took place in the second half of the Devonian period - at the latest, in the subsequent Carboniferous period - in those Dipneusta which we regard as the ancestors of the Amphibia. [...] The fact that the toes number five is of great importance, because they have clearly been transmitted from the Amphibia to all the higher Vertebrates. Man entirely resembles his amphibian ancestors in this respect, and indeed in the whole structure of the bony skeleton of his five-toed extremities. A careful comparison of the skeleton of the frog with our own is enough to show this. [...] There is absolutely no reason why there should be five toes in the fore and hind feet in the lowest Amphibia, the reptiles, and the higher Vertebrates, unless we ascribe it to inheritance from a common stem-form. Heredity alone can explain it. It is true that we find less than five toes in many of the Amphibia and of the higher Vertebrates. But in all these cases we can prove that some of the toes atrophied, and were in time lost altogether. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)

cgu.edu.tw (Global: low place; English: low place)

memo.cgu.edu.tw

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

etymonline.com (Global: 287th place; English: 321st place)

footphysicians.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. "Bunions". Archived from the original on 2011-12-08. Retrieved 2008-03-05.

harvard.edu (Global: 18th place; English: 17th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

jbjs.org.uk (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • Janey Hughes, Peter Clark, & Leslie Klenerman. The Importance of the Toes in Walking. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 72-B, No. 2. March, 1990. [1] Archived 2008-12-17 at the Wayback Machine

nih.gov (Global: 4th place; English: 4th place)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

omim.org (Global: 4,380th place; English: 4,305th place)

patient.info (Global: low place; English: 7,180th place)

science.org (Global: 1,160th place; English: 737th place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)