Tübatulabal language (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Tübatulabal language" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

104^th place

199^th place

low place

8,196^th place

2^nd place

26^th place

20^th place

11^th place

8^th place

csulb.edu

The morphological differences between noun classes can probably be traced back to a simple case of allomorphy. At a certain point in the history of an ancestor of Tübatulabal, all class A nouns ended in a vowel, while all class B nouns ended in a consonant. (Class C forms are few in number and have a more complicated origin.) The absolute suffix in this language was *-t, which lenited intervocalically, leading to -l in Tübatulabal class A nouns (compare cognates ʈ͡ʂ in Serrano, r in Tongva.) See (Voegelin 1935)^[which?] and (Manaster Ramer 1992). Manaster Ramer, Alexis (1992). "Proto-Uto-Aztecan Phonology: Evidence From Tübatulabal Noun Morphophonemics". International Journal of American Linguistics. 58 (4): 436–446. doi:10.1086/ijal.58.4.3519778. JSTOR 3519778. S2CID 147964960.

The morphological differences between noun classes can probably be traced back to a simple case of allomorphy. At a certain point in the history of an ancestor of Tübatulabal, all class A nouns ended in a vowel, while all class B nouns ended in a consonant. (Class C forms are few in number and have a more complicated origin.) The absolute suffix in this language was *-t, which lenited intervocalically, leading to -l in Tübatulabal class A nouns (compare cognates ʈ͡ʂ in Serrano, r in Tongva.) See (Voegelin 1935)^[which?] and (Manaster Ramer 1992). Manaster Ramer, Alexis (1992). "Proto-Uto-Aztecan Phonology: Evidence From Tübatulabal Noun Morphophonemics". International Journal of American Linguistics. 58 (4): 436–446. doi:10.1086/ijal.58.4.3519778. JSTOR 3519778. S2CID 147964960.

The morphological differences between noun classes can probably be traced back to a simple case of allomorphy. At a certain point in the history of an ancestor of Tübatulabal, all class A nouns ended in a vowel, while all class B nouns ended in a consonant. (Class C forms are few in number and have a more complicated origin.) The absolute suffix in this language was *-t, which lenited intervocalically, leading to -l in Tübatulabal class A nouns (compare cognates ʈ͡ʂ in Serrano, r in Tongva.) See (Voegelin 1935)^[which?] and (Manaster Ramer 1992). Manaster Ramer, Alexis (1992). "Proto-Uto-Aztecan Phonology: Evidence From Tübatulabal Noun Morphophonemics". International Journal of American Linguistics. 58 (4): 436–446. doi:10.1086/ijal.58.4.3519778. JSTOR 3519778. S2CID 147964960.

Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger (Report) (3rd ed.). UNESCO. 2010. p. 11.