UK–US extradition treaty of 2003 (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "UK–US extradition treaty of 2003" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
8th place
10th place
1st place
1st place
12th place
11th place
30th place
24th place
367th place
243rd place
99th place
77th place
low place
low place
2,130th place
1,767th place
36th place
33rd place
241st place
193rd place
706th place
437th place
7,223rd place
4,003rd place
low place
low place
7th place
7th place
7,303rd place
4,045th place
20th place
30th place
210th place
157th place
32nd place
21st place
low place
low place
6,694th place
4,043rd place
494th place
290th place
low place
low place

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

bbc.co.uk

  • "US extradition law not biased against Britons – judge". BBC News. 18 October 2011. But Sir Scott's 486-page report finds: 'In our opinion, there is no significant difference between the probable cause test and the reasonable suspicion test. There is no practical difference between the information submitted to and from the United States.'
  • "US extradition law not biased against Britons – judge". BBC News. 18 October 2011.
  • "US extradition law not biased against Britons – judge". BBC News. 18 October 2011. The review contradicts the findings of Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR), which called for the Government to renegotiate the UK's extradition treaty with the United States to ensure British citizens get the same protection as Americans. In a report in June, the committee said US authorities should have to show enough evidence to establish probable cause before a Briton can be extradited.

bbc.com

bloomberg.com

channel4.com

friends-extradited.org

ft.com

ghostarchive.org

homeoffice.gov.uk

independent.co.uk

itv.com

nytimes.com

parliament.uk

publications.parliament.uk

  • Human Rights Joint Committee (22 June 2011). "The UK's bilateral extradition treaties: US-UK Extradition Treaty 2003". The Human Rights Implications of UK Extradition Policy. Retrieved 8 August 2012.
  • "The US–UK Extradition Treaty" (PDF). Home Affairs Committee. London: House of Commons. Retrieved 27 March 2012.

pcpro.co.uk

statewatch.org

techdirt.com

telegraph.co.uk

theguardian.com

theyworkforyou.com

timesonline.co.uk

business.timesonline.co.uk

usembassy.gov

london.usembassy.gov

  • "Frequently Asked Questions on the US-UK Extradition Relationship". US Embassy in London. Based on the numbers provided to Sir Thomas Scott Baker's panel, under this treaty, 130 extradition REQUESTS were submitted from the US to the UK. Of those 130 requests, the UK has refused 10. Of the remaining 120, 77 individuals were extradited from the UK to the US; the other 43 cases remained pending in the UK system, or the individuals returned to the US on their own, or other circumstances made the extradition no longer necessary. During the same time period, the UK submitted 54 extradition REQUESTS to the US, of which none have been refused. Of those 54 requests, 38 resulted in extradition of an individual from the US to the UK. In the remaining 16 cases, the individuals either returned to the UK on their own or other circumstances made extradition from the US to the UK no longer necessary.
  • "Frequently Asked Questions on the US-UK Extradition Relationship". US Embassy in London. the US has a population about five times the size of the UK, but there have been fewer than twice the number of people extradited to the US than to the UK. The number of US requests is therefore not disproportionate.

web.archive.org

whatdotheyknow.com