United States Army Aviation and Missile Command (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "United States Army Aviation and Missile Command" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
249th place
169th place
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
1,038th place
668th place
75th place
83rd place
low place
low place

army.mil

army.mil

amcom.army.mil

ams15.redstone.army.mil

  • "AMC Permanent Orders 344-1". 9 December 1996. Archived from the original on 15 October 2004.

redstone.army.mil

history.redstone.army.mil

defense.gov

media.defense.gov

  • Hall, R. Cargill; Neufeld, Jacob, eds. (1998). "The U.S. Air Force in Space: 1945 to the Twenty-first Century [Proceedings of Air Force Historical Foundation Symposium at Andrews AFB, Maryland, September 21-22, 1995]" (PDF). media.defense.gov. USAF History and Museums Program, United States Air Force, Washington, DC. pp. 38–39 / pdf p. 47–48. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 3 June 2025. The rise of NASA sounded the death knell of Army and Navy pretensions to a major military space role. When NASA commenced operations on October 1, 1958, it relied on the aeronautical research facilities and personnel of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. But to achieve space capability quickly, NASA needed an infusion of programs, facilities, and funding from the military services. With little objection from the Navy, NASA received Project Vanguard's personnel and facilities, including its Minitrack satellite tracking network, and more than 400 scientists from the Naval Research Laboratory. Potential Army losses, however, proved far more sweeping and contentious. They eventually included the California Institute of Technology's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), whose sympathetic director had visions of turning it into the "national space laboratory," and a portion of the Army Ballistic Missile Agency that included Wernher von Braun's team and its giant Saturn booster project. The major Air Force loss proved to be its manned space projects, which NASA combined under the designation Project Mercury."
  • Spires, David N. (1998). Bradley, George W. III; Sturdevant, Rick W.; Eckert, Richard S. (eds.). "Beyond Horizons: A Half Century of Air Force Space Leadership" (PDF). media.defense.gov (Revised ed.). pp. 65 / pdf p. 88. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 October 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2025. To achieve space capability quickly, NASA needed an infusion of space programs, facilities, and funding from the military services. In the NASA raid on service assets, the Air Force emerged the clear victor. With little objection from the Navy, NASA received Project Vanguard's personnel and facilities, including its Minitrack satellite tracking network, and more than 400 scientists and engineers from the Naval Research Laboratory. Potential Army losses, however, proved far more sweeping and contentious. Newly-appointed NASA administrator, Keith Glennan, considered the Army space program most important for providing the agency credible space design, engineering, and in-house resources. He initially requested transfer of Cal Tech's contracted Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), whose sympathetic director had visions of turning it into the "national space laboratory," and a portion of the Army Ballistic Missile Agency that included the von Braun team and its giant Saturn booster project. General Medaris, however, strongly objected and waged a public campaign to stall the process and reverse the decision. His effort produced a compromise. The JPL would be transferred to NASA by 3 December 1958, while the Huntsville complex would remain under the Army's jurisdiction and support NASA on a contractual basis. Medaris might postpone but he could not prevent a transfer. A year later the Army would lose to NASA its entire space operation at Huntsville, which would be renamed the Marshall Space Flight Center.

nasa.gov

www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov

theredstonerocket.com

web.archive.org

  • "AMC Permanent Orders 344-1". 9 December 1996. Archived from the original on 15 October 2004.
  • McCleskey, C.; D. Christensen. "Dr. Kurt H. Debus: Launching a vision" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 September 2008. Retrieved 23 October 2008.
  • "Redstone Arsenal Complex Chronology, Part II: Nerve Center of Army Missilery, 1950–62 – Section B: The ABMA/AOMC Era, 1956–62". Redstone Arsenal Historical Information. United States Army. Archived from the original on 16 July 2006. Retrieved 28 June 2006.
  • Hall, R. Cargill; Neufeld, Jacob, eds. (1998). "The U.S. Air Force in Space: 1945 to the Twenty-first Century [Proceedings of Air Force Historical Foundation Symposium at Andrews AFB, Maryland, September 21-22, 1995]" (PDF). media.defense.gov. USAF History and Museums Program, United States Air Force, Washington, DC. pp. 38–39 / pdf p. 47–48. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 3 June 2025. The rise of NASA sounded the death knell of Army and Navy pretensions to a major military space role. When NASA commenced operations on October 1, 1958, it relied on the aeronautical research facilities and personnel of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. But to achieve space capability quickly, NASA needed an infusion of programs, facilities, and funding from the military services. With little objection from the Navy, NASA received Project Vanguard's personnel and facilities, including its Minitrack satellite tracking network, and more than 400 scientists from the Naval Research Laboratory. Potential Army losses, however, proved far more sweeping and contentious. They eventually included the California Institute of Technology's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), whose sympathetic director had visions of turning it into the "national space laboratory," and a portion of the Army Ballistic Missile Agency that included Wernher von Braun's team and its giant Saturn booster project. The major Air Force loss proved to be its manned space projects, which NASA combined under the designation Project Mercury."
  • Spires, David N. (1998). Bradley, George W. III; Sturdevant, Rick W.; Eckert, Richard S. (eds.). "Beyond Horizons: A Half Century of Air Force Space Leadership" (PDF). media.defense.gov (Revised ed.). pp. 65 / pdf p. 88. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 October 2020. Retrieved 3 June 2025. To achieve space capability quickly, NASA needed an infusion of space programs, facilities, and funding from the military services. In the NASA raid on service assets, the Air Force emerged the clear victor. With little objection from the Navy, NASA received Project Vanguard's personnel and facilities, including its Minitrack satellite tracking network, and more than 400 scientists and engineers from the Naval Research Laboratory. Potential Army losses, however, proved far more sweeping and contentious. Newly-appointed NASA administrator, Keith Glennan, considered the Army space program most important for providing the agency credible space design, engineering, and in-house resources. He initially requested transfer of Cal Tech's contracted Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), whose sympathetic director had visions of turning it into the "national space laboratory," and a portion of the Army Ballistic Missile Agency that included the von Braun team and its giant Saturn booster project. General Medaris, however, strongly objected and waged a public campaign to stall the process and reverse the decision. His effort produced a compromise. The JPL would be transferred to NASA by 3 December 1958, while the Huntsville complex would remain under the Army's jurisdiction and support NASA on a contractual basis. Medaris might postpone but he could not prevent a transfer. A year later the Army would lose to NASA its entire space operation at Huntsville, which would be renamed the Marshall Space Flight Center.
  • "AMCOM: U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Life Cycle Management Command"

whnt.com