United States v. Morrison (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "United States v. Morrison" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

4justia.com

696^th place

428^th place

2vt.edu

2,431^st place

1,607^th place

2cir-usa.org

low place

2web.archive.org

1^st place

2proquest.com

206^th place

124^th place

1lclark.edu

low place

1washingtonpost.com

34^th place

27^th place

1pqarchiver.com

490^th place

322^nd place

1prospect.org

8,179^th place

5,000^th place

cir-usa.org

Taylor, Stuart. "Court to Congress: You can't regulate everything by Stuart Taylor Jr.", National Journal (1999-03-13). Retrieved 2007-02-13.
Shane, Peter. "In Whose Best Interests? Not the States Archived October 4, 2006, at the Wayback Machine", Washington Post (2000-05-21). Also see Mauro, Tony. "States' Rights Triumph in Supreme Court Kimel Decision, Oral VAWA Argument", Legal Intelligencer (2000-01-12); Greenhouse, Linda. "Justices Cool to Law Protecting Women", New York Times, (2000-01-12)

justia.com

law.justia.com

Motz Gribbon, Diane. "Christy Brzonkala v. Antonio Morrison". Justia. Retrieved March 19, 2022.
Brzonkala v. Va. Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ., 935 F. Supp. 779 (W.D. Va. 1996).
Brzonkala v. Va. Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ., 132 F.3d 949 (4th Cir. 1997).
Brzonkala v. Va. Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ., 169 F.3d 820 (4th Cir. 1999).

lclark.edu

law.lclark.edu

However, see Jonathan H. Adler, "Is Morrison Dead? Assessing a Supreme Court Drug (Law) Overdose", Lewis & Clark L. Rev. (Winter 2005) (discussing Gonzalez v. Raich)

pqarchiver.com

pqasb.pqarchiver.com

The Washington Post, Editorial: States’ Business, (2000-05-16). Retrieved 2007-02-13.

proquest.com

Masters, Brooke A. "'No winners' in Rape Lawsuit". ProQuest. ProQuest 408640898. Retrieved March 18, 2022.

search.proquest.com

Masters, Brooke A. "'No winners' in Rape Lawsuit". ProQuest. ProQuest 408640898. Retrieved March 18, 2022.

prospect.org

Kaminer, Wendy. ""Sexual Congress". Archived from the original on November 1, 2005. Retrieved July 18, 2018.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)", American Prospect (2000-02-14). Retrieved 2007-02-13. Kaminer's article also stated:
"Try the common sense test: When you think of a rape in a college dormitory, do you think about interstate commerce? As the Fourth Circuit noted in Brzonkala, the relationship between sexual violence and interstate commerce is rather attenuated.... Do you want Congress to enjoy unrestricted regulatory power over you? (Do you want your divorce in federal court? Do you want Congress making local zoning decisions for your town?) The Supreme Court in Lopez rightly held that the Commerce Clause is not a grant of general police power.... This standard does not unduly limit congressional power, including the power to prohibit discrimination. It does not invalidate the Civil Rights Act of 1964: Segregation in hotels and restaurants, on transportation systems, and in the workplace involved commercial activities with clear and substantial effects upon interstate commerce." "Sexual Congress". Archived from the original on November 1, 2005. Retrieved July 18, 2018.

vt.edu

scholar.lib.vt.edu

Hayden, Betty; Vertefeuille, Jane. "VIRGINIA TECH SAYS WOMAN CHANGED STORY SCHOOL ASKS FOR DISMISSAL OF HER CIVIL SUIT AGAINST IT, MORRISON, CRAWFORD". Virginian Pilot. Retrieved March 18, 2022.
Hayden, Betty; Vertefeuille, Jane. "VIRGINIA TECH SAYS WOMAN CHANGED STORY SCHOOL ASKS FOR DISMISSAL OF HER CIVIL SUIT AGAINST IT, MORRISON, CRAWFORD". Virginian Pilot. Retrieved March 18, 2022.

washingtonpost.com

Masters, Brooke. "No Winners in Rape Lawsuit", The Washington Post, May 19, 2000: "Although the case started as a classic 'he said, she said,' by the time it reached the Supreme Court, U.S. v. Morrison was all about federalism, not sexual politics."

web.archive.org

Kaminer, Wendy. ""Sexual Congress". Archived from the original on November 1, 2005. Retrieved July 18, 2018.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)", American Prospect (2000-02-14). Retrieved 2007-02-13. Kaminer's article also stated:
"Try the common sense test: When you think of a rape in a college dormitory, do you think about interstate commerce? As the Fourth Circuit noted in Brzonkala, the relationship between sexual violence and interstate commerce is rather attenuated.... Do you want Congress to enjoy unrestricted regulatory power over you? (Do you want your divorce in federal court? Do you want Congress making local zoning decisions for your town?) The Supreme Court in Lopez rightly held that the Commerce Clause is not a grant of general police power.... This standard does not unduly limit congressional power, including the power to prohibit discrimination. It does not invalidate the Civil Rights Act of 1964: Segregation in hotels and restaurants, on transportation systems, and in the workplace involved commercial activities with clear and substantial effects upon interstate commerce." "Sexual Congress". Archived from the original on November 1, 2005. Retrieved July 18, 2018.
Shane, Peter. "In Whose Best Interests? Not the States Archived October 4, 2006, at the Wayback Machine", Washington Post (2000-05-21). Also see Mauro, Tony. "States' Rights Triumph in Supreme Court Kimel Decision, Oral VAWA Argument", Legal Intelligencer (2000-01-12); Greenhouse, Linda. "Justices Cool to Law Protecting Women", New York Times, (2000-01-12)