Utilitarianism (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Utilitarianism" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

22doi.org

2^nd place

13jstor.org

26^th place

20^th place

9semanticscholar.org

11^th place

8^th place

7archive.org

6^th place

5stanford.edu

179^th place

183^rd place

5newadvent.org

471^st place

409^th place

5philpapers.org

1,865^th place

1,260^th place

3wikisource.org

27^th place

51^st place

3books.google.com

3^rd place

2britannica.com

40^th place

58^th place

2utilitarianism.com

low place

2handle.net

102^nd place

76^th place

2worldcat.org

5^th place

2web.archive.org

1^st place

2philosophynow.org

low place

7,508^th place

2utm.edu

1,379^th place

1,175^th place

2utexas.edu

916^th place

706^th place

1koeblergerhard.de

low place

1proquest.com

206^th place

124^th place

1philosophyoflife.org

low place

1centerforinquiry.org

low place

1mac.com

6,812^th place

5,027^th place

1andphilosophy.com

low place

1upenn.edu

702^nd place

520^th place

1gutenberg.org

489^th place

377^th place

1vatican.va

281^st place

448^th place

1ed.ac.uk

1,871^st place

1,234^th place

1animal-rights-library.com

low place

1lancaster.ac.uk

low place

1bbc.com

20^th place

30^th place

1utilitarianism.net

low place

1bbc.co.uk

8^th place

10^th place

1psu.edu

207^th place

136^th place

1ted.com

2,327^th place

1,627^th place

andphilosophy.com

Chandler Brett (16 July 2014). "24 and Philosophy". Blackwell. Retrieved 27 December 2019.

animal-rights-library.com

Mill, J. S. "Whewell on Moral Philosophy" (PDF). Collected Works. 10: 185–87.

archive.org

Hare, R.M. (1981). Moral thinking: its levels, method, and point. Oxford New York: Clarendon Press Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-824660-2.
Singer, Peter (1979). Practical ethics (1st ed.). Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-29720-2.:Singer, Peter (1993). Practical ethics (2nd ed.). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-43971-8.
Brandt, Richard B. (1979). A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-824550-6.
Smart, J. J. C.; Williams, Bernard (January 1973). Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press. pp. 42. ISBN 978-0-521-09822-9.
Paley, William (1785). "The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy". Retrieved 1 July 2012.
Smart, J. J. C.; Williams, Bernard (January 1973). Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press. pp. 27–28. ISBN 978-0-521-09822-9.
Parfit, Derek (January 1986). Reasons and Persons. Oxford Paperbacks. p. 388. ISBN 978-0-19-824908-5.

bbc.co.uk

"Ethics - Lying". BBC. 1 January 1970. Retrieved 30 June 2022.

bbc.com

Fisher, Richard. "The intelligent monster that you should let eat you". www.bbc.com. Retrieved 2 July 2023.

books.google.com

Fraser, Chris (2016). The Philosophy of the Mòzĭ: The First Consequentialists. Columbia University Press. p. 138. ISBN 978-0-23-152059-1.
Fraser, Chris (2011). The Oxford Handbook of World Philosophy. Oxford University Press. p. 62. ISBN 978-0-19-532899-8.
Mill, John Stuart (2010) [1863]. Utilitarianism - Ed. Heydt (Broadview Editions). Broadview Press. p. 33. ISBN 978-1-55111-501-6. Retrieved 28 July 2019.

britannica.com

Duignan, Brian. [1999] 2000. "Utilitarianism" (revised). Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
Duignan, Brian; West, Henry R. "Utilitarianism". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 29 December 2020.

centerforinquiry.org

"The Dostoevsky Dilemma for Religious Ethics | Center for Inquiry". 15 February 2011.

doi.org

Habibi, Don (2001). "Mill's Moral Philosophy". John Stuart Mill and the Ethic of Human Growth. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. pp. 89–90, 112. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2010-6_3. ISBN 978-90-481-5668-9.
Smith, Wilson (July 1954). "William Paley's Theological Utilitarianism in America". William and Mary Quarterly. 3rd Series. 11 (3): 402–24. doi:10.2307/1943313. JSTOR 1943313.
Hauskeller, Michael (2011). "No Philosophy for Swine: John Stuart Mill on the Quality of Pleasures". Utilitas. 23 (4): 428–446. doi:10.1017/S0953820811000264. hdl:10871/9381. S2CID 170099688.
Saunders, Ben. 2010. "J. S. Mill's Conception of Utility." Utilitas 22(1):52–69. doi:10.1017/S0953820809990380. ProQuest 200183451.
Popkin, Richard H. (1950). "A Note on the 'Proof' of Utility in J. S. Mill". Ethics. 61: 66–68. doi:10.1086/290751. S2CID 170936711.
Hall, Everett W. (1949). "The 'Proof' of Utility in Bentham and Mill". Ethics. 60: 1–18. doi:10.1086/290691. S2CID 145767787.
Smart, J. J. C. (1956). "Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism". Philosophical Quarterly. 6 (25): 344–54. doi:10.2307/2216786. JSTOR 2216786. S2CID 147501349.
McCloskey, H. J. (October 1957). "An Examination of Restricted Utilitarianism". Philosophical Review. 66 (4): 466–85. doi:10.2307/2182745. JSTOR 2182745.
Urmson, J. O. (1953). "The Interpretation of the Moral Philosophy of J. S. Mill". Philosophical Quarterly. 3 (10): 33–39. doi:10.2307/2216697. JSTOR 2216697.
Hare, R. M. (1972–1973). "The Presidential Address: Principles". Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. New Series. 73: 1–18. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/73.1.1. JSTOR 4544830.
Smart, R.N. (October 1958). "Negative Utilitarianism". Mind. 67 (268): 542–43. doi:10.1093/mind/lxvii.268.542. JSTOR 2251207.
Knutsson, Simon (29 August 2019). "The world destruction argument". Inquiry. 64 (10): 1004–1023. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2019.1658631. ISSN 0020-174X.
Feldman, Fred (May 1993). "On the Consistency of Act- and Motive-Utilitarianism: A Reply to Robert Adams". Philosophical Studies. 70 (2): 211–12. doi:10.1007/BF00989590. S2CID 170691423.
Slote, Michael (1984). "Satisficing Consequentialism". Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes. 58: 139–176. doi:10.1093/aristoteliansupp/58.1.139. JSTOR 4106846.
GANDJOUR, Afschin (30 June 2007). "Is it Rational to Pursue Utilitarianism?". Ethical Perspectives. 14 (2): 139–158. doi:10.2143/EP.14.2.2023965.
Harsanyi, John C. (June 1975). "Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls's Theory A Theory of Justice by John Rawls". American Political Science Review. 69 (2): 594–606. doi:10.2307/1959090. JSTOR 1959090. S2CID 118261543.
Norcross, Alastair (2009). "Two Dogmas of Deontology: Aggregation, Rights and the Separateness of Persons" (PDF). Social Philosophy and Policy. 26: 81–82. doi:10.1017/S0265052509090049. S2CID 45454555. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 November 2009. Retrieved 29 June 2012.
Mill, John Stuart (1981). "Comments upon James Mill's Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind". In Robson, John (ed.). Collected Works, volume 31. University of Toronto Press. pp. 252–53. ISBN 978-0-7100-0718-6. and as quoted by Ridge, Michael (2002). "Mill's Intentions and Motives" (PDF). Utilitas. 14: 54–70. doi:10.1017/S0953820800003393. hdl:20.500.11820/deb5b261-303a-4395-9ea4-4a9367e7592b. S2CID 58918919.
Dancy, Jonathan (2000). "Mill's Puzzling Footnote". Utilitas. 12 (2): 219–22. doi:10.1017/S095382080000279X. S2CID 145777437.
Cowen, T. (2003). c. Hargrove, Eugene (ed.). "Policing Nature". Environmental Ethics. 25 (2): 169–182. doi:10.5840/enviroethics200325231.
N. Gregory Mankiw; Matthew Weinzierl (2010). "The Optimal Taxation of Height: A Case Study of Utilitarian Income Redistribution". American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 2 (1): 155–176. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.208.8375. doi:10.1257/pol.2.1.155. JSTOR 25760055.
Bailey, William C., J. David Martin, and Louis N. Gray. "Crime and deterrence: A correlation analysis." Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 11.2 (1974): 124-143.

ed.ac.uk

pure.ed.ac.uk

Mill, John Stuart (1981). "Comments upon James Mill's Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind". In Robson, John (ed.). Collected Works, volume 31. University of Toronto Press. pp. 252–53. ISBN 978-0-7100-0718-6. and as quoted by Ridge, Michael (2002). "Mill's Intentions and Motives" (PDF). Utilitas. 14: 54–70. doi:10.1017/S0953820800003393. hdl:20.500.11820/deb5b261-303a-4395-9ea4-4a9367e7592b. S2CID 58918919.

gutenberg.org

Carlyle, Thomas (1841). "Lecture II. The Hero as Prophet. Mahomet: Islam.". On Heroes, Hero-Worship, & the Heroic in History.

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

Hauskeller, Michael (2011). "No Philosophy for Swine: John Stuart Mill on the Quality of Pleasures". Utilitas. 23 (4): 428–446. doi:10.1017/S0953820811000264. hdl:10871/9381. S2CID 170099688.
Mill, John Stuart (1981). "Comments upon James Mill's Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind". In Robson, John (ed.). Collected Works, volume 31. University of Toronto Press. pp. 252–53. ISBN 978-0-7100-0718-6. and as quoted by Ridge, Michael (2002). "Mill's Intentions and Motives" (PDF). Utilitas. 14: 54–70. doi:10.1017/S0953820800003393. hdl:20.500.11820/deb5b261-303a-4395-9ea4-4a9367e7592b. S2CID 58918919.

jstor.org

Smith, Wilson (July 1954). "William Paley's Theological Utilitarianism in America". William and Mary Quarterly. 3rd Series. 11 (3): 402–24. doi:10.2307/1943313. JSTOR 1943313.
Smart, J. J. C. (1956). "Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism". Philosophical Quarterly. 6 (25): 344–54. doi:10.2307/2216786. JSTOR 2216786. S2CID 147501349.
McCloskey, H. J. (October 1957). "An Examination of Restricted Utilitarianism". Philosophical Review. 66 (4): 466–85. doi:10.2307/2182745. JSTOR 2182745.
Urmson, J. O. (1953). "The Interpretation of the Moral Philosophy of J. S. Mill". Philosophical Quarterly. 3 (10): 33–39. doi:10.2307/2216697. JSTOR 2216697.
Hare, R. M. (1972–1973). "The Presidential Address: Principles". Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. New Series. 73: 1–18. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/73.1.1. JSTOR 4544830.
Harsanyi, John C. 1977. "Morality and the theory of rational behavior." Social Research 44 (4):623–56. JSTOR 40971169.
Smart, R.N. (October 1958). "Negative Utilitarianism". Mind. 67 (268): 542–43. doi:10.1093/mind/lxvii.268.542. JSTOR 2251207.
Senior, W.A. (2004). "Le Guin's "Omelas": Issues of Genre". Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 15 (3 (59)): 186–188. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 43310242.
Kagan, Shelly (1984). "Does Consequentialism Demand too Much? Recent Work on the Limits of Obligation". Philosophy & Public Affairs. 13 (3): 239–54. JSTOR 2265413.
Slote, Michael (1984). "Satisficing Consequentialism". Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes. 58: 139–176. doi:10.1093/aristoteliansupp/58.1.139. JSTOR 4106846.
Kagan, Shelly (Summer 1984). "Does Consequentialism Demand too Much? Recent Work on the Limits of Obligation". Philosophy & Public Affairs. 13 (3): 239–254. JSTOR 2265413.
Harsanyi, John C. (June 1975). "Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls's Theory A Theory of Justice by John Rawls". American Political Science Review. 69 (2): 594–606. doi:10.2307/1959090. JSTOR 1959090. S2CID 118261543.
N. Gregory Mankiw; Matthew Weinzierl (2010). "The Optimal Taxation of Height: A Case Study of Utilitarian Income Redistribution". American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 2 (1): 155–176. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.208.8375. doi:10.1257/pol.2.1.155. JSTOR 25760055.

koeblergerhard.de

Bentham, Jeremy. 1780. "Of The Principle of Utility." Pp. 1–6 in An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: T. Payne and Sons. (Also available as eText, Wikisource). p. 1.

lancaster.ac.uk

"Mill's "On Nature"". www.lancaster.ac.uk. 1904. Retrieved 9 August 2015.

mac.com

homepage.mac.com

Norcross, Alastair (2009). "Two Dogmas of Deontology: Aggregation, Rights and the Separateness of Persons" (PDF). Social Philosophy and Policy. 26: 81–82. doi:10.1017/S0265052509090049. S2CID 45454555. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 November 2009. Retrieved 29 June 2012.

newadvent.org

"SUMMA THEOLOGICA: Man's last end (Prima Secundae Partis, Q. 1)". newadvent.org.
"SUMMA THEOLOGICA: Things in which man's happiness consists (Prima Secundae Partis, Q. 2)". newadvent.org.
"SUMMA THtheEOLOGICA: What is happiness (Prima Secundae Partis, Q. 3)". newadvent.org.
"SUMMA THEOLOGICA: Things that are required for happiness (Prima Secundae Partis, Q. 4)". newadvent.org.
"SUMMA THEOLOGICA: The attainment of happiness (Prima Secundae Partis, Q. 5)". newadvent.org.

philosophynow.org

In Moral Laws of the Jungle (link to Philosophy Now magazine), Iain King argues: "The way I reconcile my interests with those of other people is not for all of us to pour everything we care about into a pot then see which of the combination of satisfied wants would generate the most happiness (benefit). If we did that, I could be completely outnumbered... No, the way we reconcile interests is through empathy. Empathy is one-to-one, since we only imagine ourselves in the mind of one other person at a time. Even when I empathise with 'the people' here... I am really imagining what it is like to be just one woman. I cannot imagine myself to be more than one person at a time, and neither can you." Link accessed 2014-01-29.
This quote is from Iain King's article in issue 100 of Philosophy Now magazine, Moral Laws of the Jungle (link), accessed 29 January 2014.

philosophyoflife.org

{Chao, "Negative Average Preference Utilitarianism", Journal of Philosophy of Life, 2012; 2(1): 55–66

philpapers.org

Craig, Edward (1996). "Sidgwick, Henry". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
Honderich, Ted (2005). "Sidgwick, Henry". The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Borchert, Donald M. (2006). "Sidgwick, Henry". Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd Edition. Macmillan.
Borchert, Donald M. (2006). "Sidgwick, Henry [Addendum]". Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd Edition. Macmillan.
Ross, W. D. (2002) [1930]. The Right and the Good. Clarendon Press.

proquest.com

Saunders, Ben. 2010. "J. S. Mill's Conception of Utility." Utilitas 22(1):52–69. doi:10.1017/S0953820809990380. ProQuest 200183451.

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

N. Gregory Mankiw; Matthew Weinzierl (2010). "The Optimal Taxation of Height: A Case Study of Utilitarian Income Redistribution". American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 2 (1): 155–176. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.208.8375. doi:10.1257/pol.2.1.155. JSTOR 25760055.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Hauskeller, Michael (2011). "No Philosophy for Swine: John Stuart Mill on the Quality of Pleasures". Utilitas. 23 (4): 428–446. doi:10.1017/S0953820811000264. hdl:10871/9381. S2CID 170099688.
Popkin, Richard H. (1950). "A Note on the 'Proof' of Utility in J. S. Mill". Ethics. 61: 66–68. doi:10.1086/290751. S2CID 170936711.
Hall, Everett W. (1949). "The 'Proof' of Utility in Bentham and Mill". Ethics. 60: 1–18. doi:10.1086/290691. S2CID 145767787.
Smart, J. J. C. (1956). "Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism". Philosophical Quarterly. 6 (25): 344–54. doi:10.2307/2216786. JSTOR 2216786. S2CID 147501349.
Feldman, Fred (May 1993). "On the Consistency of Act- and Motive-Utilitarianism: A Reply to Robert Adams". Philosophical Studies. 70 (2): 211–12. doi:10.1007/BF00989590. S2CID 170691423.
Harsanyi, John C. (June 1975). "Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls's Theory A Theory of Justice by John Rawls". American Political Science Review. 69 (2): 594–606. doi:10.2307/1959090. JSTOR 1959090. S2CID 118261543.
Norcross, Alastair (2009). "Two Dogmas of Deontology: Aggregation, Rights and the Separateness of Persons" (PDF). Social Philosophy and Policy. 26: 81–82. doi:10.1017/S0265052509090049. S2CID 45454555. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 November 2009. Retrieved 29 June 2012.
Mill, John Stuart (1981). "Comments upon James Mill's Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind". In Robson, John (ed.). Collected Works, volume 31. University of Toronto Press. pp. 252–53. ISBN 978-0-7100-0718-6. and as quoted by Ridge, Michael (2002). "Mill's Intentions and Motives" (PDF). Utilitas. 14: 54–70. doi:10.1017/S0953820800003393. hdl:20.500.11820/deb5b261-303a-4395-9ea4-4a9367e7592b. S2CID 58918919.
Dancy, Jonathan (2000). "Mill's Puzzling Footnote". Utilitas. 12 (2): 219–22. doi:10.1017/S095382080000279X. S2CID 145777437.

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

Goodman, Charles. 2016. "Śāntideva", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 31 August 2020.
Brink, David. [2007] 2018. "Mill Moral and Political Philosophy." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
Schultz, Barton (2020). "Henry Sidgwick". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
Habib, Allen. [2008] 2014. "Promises." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Briggs, Rachael (2017), "Normative Theories of Rational Choice: Expected Utility", in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 15 November 2017

ted.com

Peter Singer: The why and how of effective altruism | Talk Video. TED.com.

upenn.edu

knarf.english.upenn.edu

"Godwin, "Political Justice," Book 2, Chap. 2".

utexas.edu

ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu

"Utilitarianism". Ethics Unwrapped. Austin, TX: McCombs School of Business. Retrieved 27 May 2020.

laits.utexas.edu

"ME Book 3 Chapter 14 Section 5". www.laits.utexas.edu. Retrieved 13 May 2021.

utilitarianism.com

Bentham, Jeremy. 1780. "Of The Principle of Utility." Pp. 1–6 in An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: T. Payne and Sons. (Also available as eText, Wikisource). p. 1.
Mill, John Stuart. "Utilitarianism, Chapter 2". Retrieved 24 June 2012.

utilitarianism.net

MacAskill, William; Meissner, Darius. "Acting on Utilitarianism". Introduction to Utilitarianism. Retrieved 11 February 2021.

utm.edu

iep.utm.edu

Simpson, David L. "William David Ross". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
"Punishment | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy". Retrieved 5 October 2023.

vatican.va

"Letter to Families". Archived from the original on 5 April 2011. Retrieved 1 April 2011.

web.archive.org

Norcross, Alastair (2009). "Two Dogmas of Deontology: Aggregation, Rights and the Separateness of Persons" (PDF). Social Philosophy and Policy. 26: 81–82. doi:10.1017/S0265052509090049. S2CID 45454555. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 November 2009. Retrieved 29 June 2012.
"Letter to Families". Archived from the original on 5 April 2011. Retrieved 1 April 2011.

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

Mill, John Stuart. 1861. Utilitarianism. n1.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1780. "Of The Principle of Utility." Pp. 1–6 in An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: T. Payne and Sons. (Also available as eText, Wikisource). p. 1.
Das Kapital Volume 1, Chapter 24, endnote 50

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Knutsson, Simon (29 August 2019). "The world destruction argument". Inquiry. 64 (10): 1004–1023. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2019.1658631. ISSN 0020-174X.
Senior, W.A. (2004). "Le Guin's "Omelas": Issues of Genre". Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 15 (3 (59)): 186–188. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 43310242.