Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Victoria's Secret" in English language version.
{{cite magazine}}
: Unknown parameter |agency=
ignored (help)In EEOC v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc., the EEOC alleged that defendant, subjected charging party," ". . . to a hostile working environment because of her race and religion (Baptist) and failed to accommodate her need to attend religious services." "As a result of the hostile working environment, charging party quit her job. The case was resolved through a consent decree which provides for payment of $179,300 to charging party.
Workers are allowed just 3.3 minutes to sew each $14 Victoria's Secret women's bikini, for which they are paid four cents. The workers' wages amount to less than 3/10ths of one percent of the $14 retail price of the Victoria's Secret bikini
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite magazine}}
: Unknown parameter |agency=
ignored (help){{cite magazine}}
: Unknown parameter |agency=
ignored (help){{cite magazine}}
: Unknown parameter |agency=
ignored (help){{cite magazine}}
: Unknown parameter |agency=
ignored (help){{cite magazine}}
: Unknown parameter |agency=
ignored (help){{cite magazine}}
: Unknown parameter |agency=
ignored (help){{cite magazine}}
: Unknown parameter |agency=
ignored (help){{cite magazine}}
: Unknown parameter |agency=
ignored (help){{cite magazine}}
: Unknown parameter |agency=
ignored (help){{cite magazine}}
: Unknown parameter |agency=
ignored (help){{cite magazine}}
: Unknown parameter |agency=
ignored (help){{cite magazine}}
: Unknown parameter |agency=
ignored (help){{cite magazine}}
: Unknown parameter |agency=
ignored (help)In EEOC v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc., the EEOC alleged that defendant, subjected charging party," ". . . to a hostile working environment because of her race and religion (Baptist) and failed to accommodate her need to attend religious services." "As a result of the hostile working environment, charging party quit her job. The case was resolved through a consent decree which provides for payment of $179,300 to charging party.