VisualEditor (English Wikipedia)

ehe (2011-12-14). "Wikimedia testing visual editor". h-online. Archived from the original on 2013-07-27. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
djwm (2012-12-13). "VisualEditor launched in Wikipedia". h-online. Archived from the original on 2013-07-27. Retrieved 2013-07-28.

loc.gov (Global: 70^th place; English: 63^rd place)

webarchive.loc.gov

Simonite, Tom (October 22, 2013). "The Decline of Wikipedia: Even As More People Than Ever Rely on It, Fewer People Create It". MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on October 23, 2013. Retrieved January 17, 2014.

mediawiki.org (Global: low place; English: 9,522^nd place)

"Parsoid". MediaWiki. Archived from the original on 2014-11-25.
"MediaWiki 1.35". MediaWiki. Retrieved 2021-03-16.
"VisualEditor". MediaWiki. Archived from the original on 2013-09-27.
"Wikimedia Engineering 2015 Q1 Goals". MediaWiki. Archived from the original on 2018-10-24. Retrieved 2018-10-24.
"Project:VisualEditor testing/Welcome". MediaWiki. Archived from the original on Oct 23, 2022.

softpedia.com (Global: 3,250^th place; English: 2,302^nd place)

news.softpedia.com

Gabriela Vatu (2013-06-06). "Wikipedia's Visual Editor to Be Rolled Out". Softpedia. Archived from the original on 2013-06-15. Retrieved 2013-07-06.
Lucian Parfeni (2013-07-02). "Wikipedia's New VisualEditor Is the Best Update in Years and You Can Make It Better". Softpedia. Archived from the original on 2013-10-03. Retrieved 2013-07-30.

technologyreview.com (Global: 1,943^rd place; English: 1,253^rd place)

Simonite, Tom (October 22, 2013). "The Decline of Wikipedia: Even As More People Than Ever Rely on It, Fewer People Create It". MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on October 23, 2013. Retrieved January 17, 2014.

theatlantic.com (Global: 228^th place; English: 158^th place)

Megan Garber (2012-07-12). "On the Ugliness of Wikipedia". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 2013-07-03. Retrieved 2013-07-29.

thenextweb.com (Global: 1,356^th place; English: 870^th place)

Emil Protalinski (2013-07-02). "Wikimedia rolls out WYSIWYG visual editor for logged-in users accessing Wikipedia articles in English". The Next Web. Archived from the original on 2013-07-05. Retrieved 2013-07-06.

theregister.co.uk (Global: 1,216^th place; English: 797^th place)

Andrew Orlowski (2013-09-25). "Revolting peasants force Wikipedia to cut'n'paste Visual Editor into the bin". The Register. Archived from the original on 2013-10-01. Retrieved 2013-10-06.
Simon Sharwood (2013-06-07). "Wikimedia edges closer to banishing Wikitext". The Register. Archived from the original on 2013-07-28. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
Andrew Orlowski (2013-08-01). "Wikipedians say no to Jimmy's 'buggy' WYSIWYG editor". The Register. Archived from the original on 2013-08-04. Retrieved 2013-08-05.

theverge.com (Global: 114^th place; English: 90^th place)

Andrew Webster (2012-06-22). "Wikimedia releases updated prototype for simplified visual editor". The Verge. Archived from the original on 2013-09-27. Retrieved 2013-07-27.
Jamie Keene (2011-12-15). "Wikimedia Foundation previews simplified visual editor". The Verge. Archived from the original on 2013-09-28. Retrieved 2013-07-28.

ubergizmo.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Gene Ryan Briones (2012-06-21). "Wikimedia launches new prototype "visual editor" for Wikipedia". Ubergizmo. Archived from the original on 2013-09-29. Retrieved 2013-07-29.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

"Parsoid". MediaWiki. Archived from the original on 2014-11-25.
Andrew Webster (2012-06-22). "Wikimedia releases updated prototype for simplified visual editor". The Verge. Archived from the original on 2013-09-27. Retrieved 2013-07-27.
Emil Protalinski (2013-07-02). "Wikimedia rolls out WYSIWYG visual editor for logged-in users accessing Wikipedia articles in English". The Next Web. Archived from the original on 2013-07-05. Retrieved 2013-07-06.
L.M. (2011-12-13). "Changes at Wikipedia: Seeing things". The Economist. Archived from the original on 2013-06-09. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
Tim Sampson (2012-07-04). "Will Wikipedia's pretty new editing software solve its recruitment crisis?". The Daily Dot. Archived from the original on 2013-09-27. Retrieved 2013-07-27.
Andrew Orlowski (2013-09-25). "Revolting peasants force Wikipedia to cut'n'paste Visual Editor into the bin". The Register. Archived from the original on 2013-10-01. Retrieved 2013-10-06.
Tim Sampson (2013-09-24). "Wikipedia faces revolt over VisualEditor". The Daily Dot. Archived from the original on 2013-09-25. Retrieved 2013-09-25.
Martin Brinkmann (2012-02-24). "Wikipedia Visual Editor Coming Soon". ghacks. Archived from the original on 2013-09-27. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
ehe (2011-12-14). "Wikimedia testing visual editor". h-online. Archived from the original on 2013-07-27. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
Megan Garber (2012-07-12). "On the Ugliness of Wikipedia". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 2013-07-03. Retrieved 2013-07-29.
Gene Ryan Briones (2012-06-21). "Wikimedia launches new prototype "visual editor" for Wikipedia". Ubergizmo. Archived from the original on 2013-09-29. Retrieved 2013-07-29.
Jamie Keene (2011-12-15). "Wikimedia Foundation previews simplified visual editor". The Verge. Archived from the original on 2013-09-28. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
Gabriela Vatu (2013-06-06). "Wikipedia's Visual Editor to Be Rolled Out". Softpedia. Archived from the original on 2013-06-15. Retrieved 2013-07-06.
Simon Sharwood (2013-06-07). "Wikimedia edges closer to banishing Wikitext". The Register. Archived from the original on 2013-07-28. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
"VisualEditor". MediaWiki. Archived from the original on 2013-09-27.
"Wikimedia Engineering 2015 Q1 Goals". MediaWiki. Archived from the original on 2018-10-24. Retrieved 2018-10-24.
Kirkburn (June 3, 2014). "VisualEditor - the past, present and future". Wikia Community Central. Archived from the original on 2015-12-08. Retrieved 2015-12-02.
djwm (2012-12-13). "VisualEditor launched in Wikipedia". h-online. Archived from the original on 2013-07-27. Retrieved 2013-07-28.
Sumana Harihareswara; Guillaume Paumier. "The Architecture of Open Source Applications (Volume 2): MediaWiki". aosabook.org. Archived from the original on 2013-09-24. Retrieved 2013-07-27.
"Project:VisualEditor testing/Welcome". MediaWiki. Archived from the original on Oct 23, 2022.
Andrew Orlowski (2013-08-01). "Wikipedians say no to Jimmy's 'buggy' WYSIWYG editor". The Register. Archived from the original on 2013-08-04. Retrieved 2013-08-05.
Lucian Parfeni (2013-07-02). "Wikipedia's New VisualEditor Is the Best Update in Years and You Can Make It Better". Softpedia. Archived from the original on 2013-10-03. Retrieved 2013-07-30.
"Research:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/June 2013 study". Wikimedia Foundation. Archived from the original on 10 September 2016. Retrieved 10 August 2016.

wikia.com (Global: 1,254^th place; English: low place)

community.wikia.com

Kirkburn (June 3, 2014). "VisualEditor - the past, present and future". Wikia Community Central. Archived from the original on 2015-12-08. Retrieved 2015-12-02.

wikimedia.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

meta.wikimedia.org

"VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/May 2015 study". Wikimedia.org. Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved 2 August 2016.
"Research:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/June 2013 study". Wikimedia Foundation. Archived from the original on 10 September 2016. Retrieved 10 August 2016.

phabricator.wikimedia.org

LICENSE.txt, VisualEditor source code repository

wikipedia.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

en.wikipedia.org

"Wikipedia:VisualEditor". Wikipedia. Retrieved 15 September 2013.
Forrester, James (2015-09-01). "Gradual availability of VisualEditor for new users is now complete". Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

ar.wikipedia.org

Respective Wikipedia websites: Arabic, Portuguese and Indic languages' Urdu, Hindi, Bihari, Gujarati

pt.wikipedia.org

Respective Wikipedia websites: Arabic, Portuguese and Indic languages' Urdu, Hindi, Bihari, Gujarati

ur.wikipedia.org

Respective Wikipedia websites: Arabic, Portuguese and Indic languages' Urdu, Hindi, Bihari, Gujarati

hi.wikipedia.org

Respective Wikipedia websites: Arabic, Portuguese and Indic languages' Urdu, Hindi, Bihari, Gujarati

bh.wikipedia.org

Respective Wikipedia websites: Arabic, Portuguese and Indic languages' Urdu, Hindi, Bihari, Gujarati

gu.wikipedia.org

Respective Wikipedia websites: Arabic, Portuguese and Indic languages' Urdu, Hindi, Bihari, Gujarati

VisualEditor (English Wikipedia)

aosabook.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

dailydot.com (Global: 998th place; English: 632nd place)

economist.com (Global: 254th place; English: 236th place)

ghacks.net (Global: low place; English: 7,914th place)

github.com (Global: 383rd place; English: 320th place)

h-online.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

loc.gov (Global: 70th place; English: 63rd place)

webarchive.loc.gov

mediawiki.org (Global: low place; English: 9,522nd place)

softpedia.com (Global: 3,250th place; English: 2,302nd place)

news.softpedia.com

technologyreview.com (Global: 1,943rd place; English: 1,253rd place)

theatlantic.com (Global: 228th place; English: 158th place)

thenextweb.com (Global: 1,356th place; English: 870th place)

theregister.co.uk (Global: 1,216th place; English: 797th place)

theverge.com (Global: 114th place; English: 90th place)

ubergizmo.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

wikia.com (Global: 1,254th place; English: low place)

community.wikia.com

wikimedia.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

meta.wikimedia.org

phabricator.wikimedia.org

wikipedia.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

en.wikipedia.org

ar.wikipedia.org

pt.wikipedia.org

ur.wikipedia.org

hi.wikipedia.org

bh.wikipedia.org

gu.wikipedia.org

dailydot.com (Global: 998^th place; English: 632^nd place)

economist.com (Global: 254^th place; English: 236^th place)

ghacks.net (Global: low place; English: 7,914^th place)

github.com (Global: 383^rd place; English: 320^th place)

loc.gov (Global: 70^th place; English: 63^rd place)

mediawiki.org (Global: low place; English: 9,522^nd place)

softpedia.com (Global: 3,250^th place; English: 2,302^nd place)

technologyreview.com (Global: 1,943^rd place; English: 1,253^rd place)

theatlantic.com (Global: 228^th place; English: 158^th place)

thenextweb.com (Global: 1,356^th place; English: 870^th place)

theregister.co.uk (Global: 1,216^th place; English: 797^th place)

theverge.com (Global: 114^th place; English: 90^th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

wikia.com (Global: 1,254^th place; English: low place)