WHOIS (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "WHOIS" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
2,810th place
1,907th place
214th place
176th place
2nd place
2nd place
3rd place
3rd place
6,184th place
4,465th place
low place
low place
383rd place
320th place
3,796th place
2,268th place
14th place
14th place
70th place
63rd place
3,857th place
2,958th place
low place
7,006th place
low place
low place
5,196th place
3,635th place
11th place
8th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
175th place
137th place
18th place
17th place
786th place
558th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,559th place
3,568th place

actnowdomains.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

apnic.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

wq.apnic.net

archive.today (Global: 14th place; English: 14th place)

arin.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

whois.arin.net

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

circleid.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

com.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

news.com.com

computer.org (Global: 5,196th place; English: 3,635th place)

  • Newton, Andrew (July 2006). "Replacing the Whois Protocol: IRIS and the IETF's CRISP Working Group". IEEE Internet Computing. 10 (4): 79–84. doi:10.1109/MIC.2006.86. S2CID 8514005. Archived from the original on 2 June 2015. Retrieved 1 June 2015. The Nicname/Whois protocol has served well, but it remains unchanged since it was first published in the early 1980s, despite great change in the infrastructure and administration of the Internet. There is now more diversity with domain names and IP networks and associated contacts, as well as among the users submitting queries via Whois. The protocol is now so fragmented in terms of information flow and output that queries yield inconsistent results under current conditions. To address the needs of today's Internet, the IETF Cross Registry Internet Service Protocol (CRISP) working group is developing a new protocol, the Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS), to replace Whois.

cpaglobal.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

newlegalreview.cpaglobal.com

darpa.mil (Global: low place; English: 7,006th place)

debian.org (Global: 3,857th place; English: 2,958th place)

manpages.debian.org

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

ftc.gov (Global: 3,796th place; English: 2,268th place)

github.com (Global: 383rd place; English: 320th place)

harvard.edu (Global: 18th place; English: 17th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

icann.org (Global: 2,810th place; English: 1,907th place)

icann.org

whois.icann.org

gnso.icann.org

  • Sanz, Marcos; Newton, Andrew; Daigle, Leslie (12 January 2005). "The Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS) Protocol" (PDF). gnso.icann.org. Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 June 2015. Retrieved 1 June 2015. CRISP – Cross-Registry Internet Service Protocol: The CRISP Working Group was tasked with finding a solution to the problems that currently infest the Nicname/Whois protocol. The CRISP Working Group created a list of functional requirements. Proposals meeting these requirements were evaluated. IRIS was selected as the protocol to publish as a standard. Now an IETF Proposed Standard: RFCs: 3981, 3982, 3983

ietf.org (Global: 214th place; English: 176th place)

ietf.org

datatracker.ietf.org

internetgovernance.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

ionos.co.uk (Global: low place; English: low place)

krebsonsecurity.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

loc.gov (Global: 70th place; English: 63rd place)

thomas.loc.gov

nro.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

rfc-editor.org (Global: 6,184th place; English: 4,465th place)

ripe.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

sc.edu (Global: 5,559th place; English: 3,568th place)

jour.sc.edu

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

  • Newton, Andrew (July 2006). "Replacing the Whois Protocol: IRIS and the IETF's CRISP Working Group". IEEE Internet Computing. 10 (4): 79–84. doi:10.1109/MIC.2006.86. S2CID 8514005. Archived from the original on 2 June 2015. Retrieved 1 June 2015. The Nicname/Whois protocol has served well, but it remains unchanged since it was first published in the early 1980s, despite great change in the infrastructure and administration of the Internet. There is now more diversity with domain names and IP networks and associated contacts, as well as among the users submitting queries via Whois. The protocol is now so fragmented in terms of information flow and output that queries yield inconsistent results under current conditions. To address the needs of today's Internet, the IETF Cross Registry Internet Service Protocol (CRISP) working group is developing a new protocol, the Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS), to replace Whois.

vice.com (Global: 175th place; English: 137th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

zdnet.com (Global: 786th place; English: 558th place)