quoted from a comparison of 24 utilities on the US East Coast in the 2005 Annual Report of DC WASA, p. 38 [1] The comparison refers to a consumption level of 25 cubic feet per quarter
"NUS Consulting 2005-2006 International Water Report & Cost Survey"(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on 6 December 2006. Retrieved 17 December 2006. The study covered Denmark, Germany, the UK, Belgium, France, The Netherlands, Italy, Finland, Australia, Spain, South Africa, Sweden, Canada and the US. The methodology for assessing tariffs may be different from the methodology of the World Bank study cited above. The report means by "costs" average tariffs and not the costs of the utility, which can be lower or higher than average tariffs
"NUS Consulting 2005-2006 International Water Report & Cost Survey"(PDF). Archived from the original(PDF) on 6 December 2006. Retrieved 17 December 2006. The study covered Denmark, Germany, the UK, Belgium, France, The Netherlands, Italy, Finland, Australia, Spain, South Africa, Sweden, Canada and the US. The methodology for assessing tariffs may be different from the methodology of the World Bank study cited above. The report means by "costs" average tariffs and not the costs of the utility, which can be lower or higher than average tariffs
