Western Wall (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Western Wall" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
3rd place
3rd place
1st place
1st place
6th place
6th place
low place
low place
497th place
371st place
7th place
7th place
3,586th place
5,464th place
1,344th place
796th place
544th place
387th place
61st place
54th place
1,008th place
891st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2nd place
2nd place
2,707th place
2,707th place
1,757th place
1,054th place
571st place
403rd place
26th place
20th place
5th place
5th place
3,207th place
1,870th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
97th place
164th place
low place
low place
27th place
51st place
14th place
14th place
low place
low place
137th place
101st place
1,142nd place
893rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
4,464th place
4,468th place
9,594th place
6,316th place
565th place
460th place
11th place
8th place
low place
low place
2,440th place
1,431st place
low place
low place
1,870th place
1,304th place
3,814th place
2,595th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,955th place
1,781st place
2,486th place
1,836th place
5,343rd place
3,881st place
498th place
7,499th place
916th place
706th place
low place
low place
378th place
251st place
low place
low place
low place
6,955th place
546th place
326th place
low place
low place

aleh.org

answering-islam.org

antiquities.org.il

archive.org

archive.today

  • Lefkovits, Etgar (September 12, 2007). "Archeologists find 2nd Temple quarry". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on June 19, 2013. Retrieved October 18, 2008. An ancient quarry where King Herod's workers chiseled huge high-quality limestones for the construction of the Second Temple, including the Western Wall, has been uncovered in Jerusalem, the Israel Antiquities Authority announced Sunday (...) Dozens of quarries have previously been uncovered in Jerusalem—including ones larger than the present find—but this is the first one that archeologists have found which they believe was used in the construction of the Temple Mount itself.

archnet.org

biblicalarchaeology.org

  • "The Temple Mount in the Herodian Period (37 BC–70 AD)". Biblical Archaeology Society. July 21, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2020.

books.google.com

chabad.org

cleveland.com

doi.org

forward.com

haaretz.com

hebrewbooks.org

huffpost.com

iaa-conservation.org.il

israelnationalnews.com

jerusalemquarterly.org

jewish-history.com

jewishpress.com

jewishvirtuallibrary.org

jpost.com

jpost.com

fr.jpost.com

  • Lefkovits, Etgar (September 12, 2007). "Archeologists find 2nd Temple quarry". The Jerusalem Post. Archived from the original on June 19, 2013. Retrieved October 18, 2008. An ancient quarry where King Herod's workers chiseled huge high-quality limestones for the construction of the Second Temple, including the Western Wall, has been uncovered in Jerusalem, the Israel Antiquities Authority announced Sunday (...) Dozens of quarries have previously been uncovered in Jerusalem—including ones larger than the present find—but this is the first one that archeologists have found which they believe was used in the construction of the Temple Mount itself.

jstor.org

jta.org

jweekly.com

ksy.org.il

lifeintheholyland.com

mfa.gov.il

nbcnews.com

nli.org.il

nytimes.com

nytimes.com

query.nytimes.com

qdl.qa

rjconline.org

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

  • Ben-Dror, Elad; Ziedler, Asaf (2015). "Israel, Jordan, and their Efforts to Frustrate the United Nations Resolutions to Internationalise Jerusalem". Diplomacy & Statecraft. 26 (4): 636–658. doi:10.1080/09592296.2015.1096685. S2CID 155549524.

sis.gov.ps

nakba.sis.gov.ps

sptimes.com

tabletmag.com

tau.ac.il

thejakartapost.com

thekotel.org

english.thekotel.org

time.com

timesofisrael.com

un.org

un.org

unispal.un.org

uscatholic.org

utexas.edu

lib.utexas.edu

uwec.edu

people.uwec.edu

washingtonjewishweek.com

web.archive.org

westernwallprayers.org

wikimedia.org

upload.wikimedia.org

commons.wikimedia.org

  • UN Conciliation Commission (1949). United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine Working Paper on the Holy Places. p. 26. The Palestine Administration interpreted the Status Quo in respect of the Wailing Wall as being that the Jewish Community had a right of access to the pavement in front of the Wall for their devotions, but that the Wall itself, the pavement in front of it and the adjacent Moroccan Quarter, were legally Moslem property. The Jews might bring to the Wall only those appurtenances of worship that were allowed under the Ottoman regime. This position was in general reaffirmed by the International Commission appointed by the British Government in 1930, with the approval of the Council of the League of Nations, to enquire into conflicting rights and claims concerning the Wailing Wall. The International Commission further ruled that although the Jews enjoyed no sort of proprietary rights to the Wall or the adjacent pavement, they should have free access to them at all times, subject to certain stipulations. The placing of benches and screens against the Wall was prohibited; the Moslems were similarly forbidden to carry out the Zikr ceremony during the progress of Jewish devotions or to cause annoyance to the Jews in any other way; no political speeches or demonstrations near the Wall were to be allowed; the Moslems' right to repair the pavement was affirmed, and if any repairs were not carried out by them in due time, the work was to be undertaken by the Government. The maintenance of the Wall itself was entrusted to the Government, but it was understood that repairs to it should be carried out only after consultation with the Supreme Moslem Council and the Chief Rabbinate.

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

  • Cust, L. G. A. (1929). The Status Quo in the Holy Places. H.M.S.O. for the High Commissioner of the Government of Palestine. pp. 44–45. The immediate neighbourhood of the Wailing Wall is inhabited by a number of Moroccan families, who are the beneficiaries of the ancient Waqf dating from the thirteenth century of Abu Midian. Some of the dwellings are entered from the space in front of the Wall. The wall separating the garden to the north from the Wailing Wall was rebuilt without incident in 1929. The wall overlooking the Wailing Wall by the Bab-al-Mughrabi was also rebuilt at the same time. The Moslems wanted to erect a low wall, but it was ruled, to preserve the Status Quo, that the wall must be rebuilt to its former height. The Wailing Wall, as being one of the few relics of the Temple of Herod of undisputed authenticity, is held in very great veneration by the Jews. Jewish writers refer to it as "the Holiest possession of the fifteen millions of Jews throughout the world which they have not forgotten for one moment since the Dispersion." On Sabbaths and other Holy Days the Wall is thronged with worshippers, the American and European Jew mixing with the Orthodox Jew in his caftan and the Bokharan in his gorgeous silks. The Jewish custom of praying here is of considerable antiquity, being mentioned by Rabbi Benjamin of Tudela and has now become an established right. This right to pray has, however, become linked with the claim to the actual ownership of the Wall. The Moslems resist this on the ground that the Wall is an integral part of the enclosure wall of the Haram al Sharif, and that the space in front of it is a public way, and part of the premises of the Abu Midian Waqf. For this reason the Moslems have always protested against the placing of benches or chairs in front of the Wall by the Jews as causing an obstruction in this public way and implying possessory rights. Though benches have certainly from time to time been introduced, there is extant a resolution taken by the Administrative Council and confirmed by the Mutasarrif in 1912 that chairs or tents or curtains (to divide the women from the men) are not to be allowed. This is still enforced, but portable camp-stools or boxes or tins with cushions are permitted for the convenience of worshippers. This ruling was notified to the Jewish religious authorities and the Police by the District Governor in 1922, and confirmed in 1926 after a rather serious dispute had arisen on account of the introduction of some benches on the previous Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur).

womenofthewall.org.il

worldcat.org

yale.edu

avalon.law.yale.edu

ynetnews.com