White Paper of 1939 (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "White Paper of 1939" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
3rd place
3rd place
367th place
243rd place
1st place
1st place
97th place
164th place
565th place
460th place
2nd place
2nd place
26th place
20th place
6th place
6th place
1,948th place
1,153rd place
70th place
63rd place
544th place
387th place

archive.org

books.google.com

  • Hershel Edelheit, History Of Zionism: A Handbook And Dictionary, Routledge ISBN 9780813329819 2000 p.366.
  • Caplan 2015, p. 114: "As it had been made clear from the start, the absence of agreement at the St James's Conference meant that the British were left, after March 17th, 1939, to finalise and to enforce their new Palestine policy unilaterally. A White Paper, first drafted in late March, was not published until early May, thus affording Arabs and Jews further opportunities to continue their efforts at influencing the final terms of the proposed British policy." Caplan, Neil (2015). Futile Diplomacy, Volume 2: Arab-Zionist Negotiations and the End of the Mandate. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-44195-3.
  • Khalaf 1991, p. 66: "The White Paper was never to be implemented, initially because of Cabinet opposition and then because of preoccupation with the war effort. However, 1939 and the first two years of the war saw a quiet, low key dialogue between the government and Palestinians who were ready to accept the White Paper. But the government's intention was to keep the Arabs placated, encourage the moderates, and continue to talk but promise very little, particularly on the constitutional provisions contained in the White Paper." Khalaf, Issa (1991). Politics in Palestine: Arab Factionalism and Social Disintegration, 1939–1948. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-0707-3.
  • King Husain and the Kingdom of Hejaz, Randall Baker, Oleander Press, 1979, ISBN 978-0-900891-48-9, page 54
  • Elie Podeh, Chances for Peace: Missed Opportunities in the Arab-Israeli Conflict, University of Texas Press 2015 pp.28ff.
  • Benny Morris (25 May 2011). Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict, 1881–1998. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. pp. 158–159. ISBN 978-0-307-78805-4. The White Paper was denounced as 'illegal,' as it contradicted the terms of the Mandate, [ ... ] In Britain, although the Conservatives had a comfortable majority in Parliament, the government was put on the defensive: Two cabinet ministers (Leslie Hore-Belisha and Walter Elliot) and 110 Conservative MPs abstained, and all of Labour's MPs voted against. Also voting against were twenty Conservative dissidents including Churchill....
  • Benny Morris (25 May 2011). "chp. 4". Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict, 1881–1998. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. p. 159. ISBN 978-0-307-78805-4. Capping it all, the Permanent Mandates Commission of the Council of the League of Nations rejected the White Paper as inconsistent with the terms of the Mandate.
  • Sarah Honig (2013). Debunking the Bull: For Seekers of Another Tack. Gefen Publishing House Ltd. pp. 123–. ISBN 978-965-229-607-8.
  • Khalaf 1991, p. 283. Khalaf, Issa (1991). Politics in Palestine: Arab Factionalism and Social Disintegration, 1939–1948. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-0707-3.
  • Cohen 2014, p. 367: "In July 1940, Colonel S.F. Newcombe, an Arabist who had served with T.E. Lawrence during World War One, made a Middle East tour sponsored by the British Council. His mission was to improve Arab public opinion about Britain. The government agreed that he should stop over in Baghdad to try unofficially, with the help of Nuri al-Said, to obtain the Mufti's endorsement of the While Paper. On his way Newcombe was briefed in Jerusalem by the High Commissioner. He was instructed to meet only with Nuri al-Said and with two prominent Palestinians. Jamal Husayni the Multi's cousin, and Musa Alami, but not with the Mufti himself. Newcombe stayed in Baghdad for 2 weeks." Cohen, Michael (2014). Britain's Moment in Palestine: Retrospect and Perspectives, 1917-1948. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-91364-1.

doi.org

jpost.com

info.jpost.com

jstor.org

loc.gov

webarchive.loc.gov

newrepublic.com

parliament.uk

api.parliament.uk

  • Debate and vote on 23 May 1939; Hansard. Downloaded 10 December 2011
  • Hansard, HC Deb 22 May 1939 vol 347 cc1937-2056 and HC Deb 23 May 1939 vol 347 cc2129-97; "Resolved, That this House approves the policy of His Majesty's Government relating to Palestine as set out in Command Paper No. 6019."
  • Hansard, HC Deb 18 February 1947 vol 433 cc985-94: "We have, therefore, reached the conclusion that the only course now open to us is to submit the problem to the judgment of the United Nations ...
    Mr. Janner Pending the remitting of this question to the United Nations, are we to understand that the Mandate stands. and that we shall deal with the situation of immigration and land restrictions on the basis of the terms of the Mandate, and that the White Paper of 1939 will be abolished?...
    Mr. Bevin No, Sir. We have not found a substitute yet for that White Paper, and up to the moment, whether it is right or wrong, the House is committed to it. That is the legal position. We did, by arrangement and agreement, extend the period of immigration which would have terminated in December, 1945. Whether there will be any further change, my right hon. Friend the Colonial Secretary, who, of course, is responsible for the administration of the policy, will be considering later."
  • House of Commons Debates, Volume 347 column 1984 [1]

un.org

unispal.un.org

web.archive.org

yale.edu

avalon.law.yale.edu