Ченто беше за обединета Македонија под протекторат на Америка: Советски документи за дејноста на претседателот на заседанието на АСНОМ [3]Archived 30 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine
Sinisa Jakov Marusic, Bulgaria Sets Tough Terms for North Macedonia's EU Progress Skopje. BIRN; 10 October 2019.
Sinisa Jakov Marusic, North Macedonia PM's Remarks About History Hit a Nerve. BIRN, November 26, 2020.
bezmonitor.com
Dr. Ivan Yanev Bulgaria's Foreign Policy During the Second World War as Reflected in Bulgarian Historic Literature 1938–1944 Варна, 2006 Издателство "Литернет" [4]
During the 20th century, Slavo-Macedonian national feeling has shifted. At the beginning of the 20th century, Slavic patriots in Macedonia felt a strong attachment to Macedonia as a multi-ethnic homeland. They imagined a Macedonian community uniting themselves with non-Slavic Macedonians... Most of these Macedonian Slavs also saw themselves as Bulgarians. By the middle of the 20th. century, however Macedonian patriots began to see Macedonian and Bulgarian loyalties as mutually exclusive. Regional Macedonian nationalism had become ethnic Macedonian nationalism... This transformation shows that the content of collective loyalties can shift.Region, Regional Identity and Regionalism in Southeastern Europe, Ethnologia Balkanica Series, Klaus Roth, Ulf Brunnbauer, LIT Verlag Münster, 2010, p. 127., ISBN3825813878
"At the end of the World War I there were very few historians or ethnographers, who claimed that a separate Macedonian nation existed... Of those Slavs who had developed some sense of national identity, the majority probably considered themselves to be Bulgarians, although they were aware of differences between themselves and the inhabitants of Bulgaria... The question as of whether a Macedonian nation actually existed in the 1940s when a Communist Yugoslavia decided to recognize one is difficult to answer. Some observers argue that even at this time it was doubtful whether the Slavs from Macedonia considered themselves to be a nationality separate from the Bulgarians." The Macedonian conflict: ethnic nationalism in a transnational world, Loring M. Danforth, Princeton University Press, 1997, ISBN0-691-04356-6, pp. 65–66.
Between past and future: civil-military relations in the post-communist Balkans, Biljana Vankovska, Håkan Wiberg, I.B. Tauris, 2003, ISBN1-86064-624-7, p. 76.
The establishment of communist regimes in Eastern Europe, 1944–1949, Norman M. Naimark, Leonid Ianovich Gibianskiĭ, Westview Press, 1997, ISBN0-8133-8997-6, p. 60.
International review of military history, Issue 60, International Committee of Historical Sciences, 1984, p. 228.
The Oxford companion to World War II, Ian Dear, Michael Richard Daniell Foot, Oxford University Press, 2001, ISBN0-19-860446-7, p. 134.
World War II: The Mediterranean 1940–1945, World War II: Essential Histories, Paul Collier, Robert O'Neill, The Rosen Publishing Group, 2010, ISBN1-4358-9132-5, p. 77.
War and revolution in Yugoslavia, 1941–1945: occupation and collaboration, Jozo Tomasevich, Stanford University Press, 2001, ISBN0-8047-3615-4, p. 168.
"War and revolution in Yugoslavia, 1941–1945: occupation and collaboration", Jozo Tomasevich, Stanford University Press, 2001, ISBN0-8047-3615-4, pp. 751–752.
Multinational Operations, Alliances, and International Military Cooperation Past and Future, William W. Epley, Robert S. Rush, Government Printing Office, ISBN0-16-079422-6, pp. 82–83.
"Multinational Operations, Alliances, and International Military Cooperation Past and Future", William W. Epley, Robert S. Rush, Government Printing Office, ISBN0-16-079422-6, pp. 82–83.
The eastern parts of Yugoslavia were the site of savage fighting between October and December 1944, as the German Army Group E tried to force its way out of an almost desperate situation it had found itself in following the evacuation of Greece. Against all odds, this huge German formation managed to best three Allied armies, rugged terrain, and autumn rains and reach the relative safety of the Independent State of Croatia, where it joined the remainder of the Axis front in the Balkans. Although this dramatic episode had been extensively written about in the former Yugoslavia and Germany, it received next to no attention in the English-speaking academic community. The article at hand will provide an overview and an analysis of military operations based on a wide plethora of primary and secondary sources of all sides. It will also argue that the ultimate success of the breakthrough was as much due to the unwillingness of the Soviet high command to devote more resources to the Balkan Front, and the structural weaknesses of the Bulgarian and Yugoslav Partisans' armies, as it was to the battlefield prowess of the Wehrmacht. For more see: Gaj Trifković (2017) 'The German Anabasis': The Breakthrough of Army Group E from Eastern Yugoslavia 1944, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 30:4, 602–629, doi:10.1080/13518046.2017.1377014.
Zerjavic, Vladimir. Yugoslavia Manipulations With the Number of Second World War Victims. Croatian Information Centre, ISBN0-919817-32-7[1]Archived 5 July 2016 at the Wayback Machine
Zerjavic, Vladimir. Yugoslavia Manipulations With the Number of Second World War Victims Publisher: Croatian Information Centre, ISBN0-919817-32-7[5]Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine
Soviet arrogance was evident at all levels of the Red Army, beginning with its commander in chief. Stalin told Tito at a meeting that the Bulgarian army (which switched sides in the war in September 1944) was superior to Partisans, praising the professionalism of its officers. This was a pure provocation from the Soviet leader. The Bulgarians were Partisan wartime foes, and regardless of whether it was true, Stalin meant to put the assertive Yugoslav leadership in its place by insulting Tito's proudest achievement: his army. Furthermore, the Red Army's operational maps often excluded Partisan units, indicating the command's failure to even acknowledge that Yugoslavs played any role in the defeat of the Germans in the country. Further below in the chain of command, Partisan commanders had to appeal to the Red Army's political departments to include in their public statements the fact that Belgrade was liberated jointly by the Red Army and Partisans and not just by the Soviets, as well as to cease treating the Partisans as unknowledgeable and as a second-rate army. For more see: Majstorović, Vojin. “The Red Army in Yugoslavia, 1944–1945.” in Slavic Review, vol. 75, no. 2, 2016, pp. 396–421, [414]. JSTOR10.5612/slavicreview.75.2.396. Accessed 24 Oct. 2020.
Македония 1941 Възкресение (Macedonia 1941 Resurrection), Сотир Нанев (Sotir Nanev), 1942, reprinted 1993 with ISBN954-528-366-1, publisher Труд (Trud).(in Bulgarian) Memoirs of a Macedonia-born Bulgarian lieutenant participating in the occupation of the Yugoslavian and Greek parts of Macedonia.
macedonian-heritage.gr
Spyridon Sfetas – Autonomist Movements of the Slavophones in 1944. The Attitude of the Communist Party of Greece and the Protection of the Greek-Yugoslav Border, pg. 7 [2]
makedonskosonce.com
Не му се судеше на Ченто, му се судеше на АСНОМ. Урнати табуата за Методија Андонов Ченто.[6]Archived 5 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine
mediapool.bg
Зоран Заев: Договорът с България ще бъде закон. Меdiapool публикува интервюто на Любчо Нешков, собственик на информационната агенция БГНЕС. 25 November 2020; Mediapool.bg.
Žrtve rata 1941–1945; rezultati popisa [Casualties of war, 1941–1945; results of the census] (PDF in Serbo-Croatian; pp. 16–23.). Belgrade: Federal Bureau of Statistics. 1966.
Иво Антонов, началник на отдел „Военни паметници и военно-патриотично възпитание“ при МО: Гробовете на нашите войници в Македония са заличени съзнателно. В-к „Труд“, 05.11.2016 г.
Zerjavic, Vladimir. Yugoslavia Manipulations With the Number of Second World War Victims. Croatian Information Centre, ISBN0-919817-32-7[1]Archived 5 July 2016 at the Wayback Machine
Ченто беше за обединета Македонија под протекторат на Америка: Советски документи за дејноста на претседателот на заседанието на АСНОМ [3]Archived 30 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine
Zerjavic, Vladimir. Yugoslavia Manipulations With the Number of Second World War Victims Publisher: Croatian Information Centre, ISBN0-919817-32-7[5]Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine
Не му се судеше на Ченто, му се судеше на АСНОМ. Урнати табуата за Методија Андонов Ченто.[6]Archived 5 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine
