XBL (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "XBL" in English language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank English rank
2,188th place
2,076th place
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
1,633rd place
1,401st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
473rd place
338th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
773rd place
432nd place

arstechnica.com (Global: 473rd place; English: 338th place)

bgrins.github.io (Global: low place; English: low place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

ghacks.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

mozilla.github.io (Global: low place; English: low place)

mozilla.org (Global: 2,188th place; English: 2,076th place)

developer.mozilla.org

mozilla.org

blog.mozilla.org

wiki.mozilla.org

oreillynet.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • King, Brian (February 5, 2003). "Remote Application Development with Mozilla, Part 2: A Case Study of the Mozilla Amazon Browser (MAB)". Oreillynet. Archived from the original on February 18, 2012. The Mozilla Amazon Browser is an interesting case study for a number of reasons. First, it's a working prototype application, not an example constructed solely for the purpose of demonstrating the technology. Second, it exercises many areas of Mozilla's support for remote development and thus shows off the capabilities, potential, and limitations of remote XUL applications. Finally, it demonstrates Mozilla's support for web services, an important emerging technology for web application development.

palemoon.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

palemoon.org

forum.palemoon.org

  • Straver, Markus (November 2, 2017). "UXP vs goanna". Archived from the original on November 11, 2020. Retrieved September 27, 2022. The plan is to switch Pale Moon over from our current platform to UXP (long-term plans) because a developed and maintained XUL-based platform is the only way a XUL application (like Pale Moon) has any chance of surviving without falling into obsolescence, with Mozilla abandoning this technology. That has been the main reason why I decided to start on this platform to begin with! Regardless, the platform will not be solely developed for Pale Moon's potential future use, it is developed for any future XUL application that will otherwise be dead in the water. Basically we're taking over the torch from Mozilla in developing and maintaining a platform for XUL applications of any kind; Mozilla should not be seen as "upstream" because it isn't.

thereisonlyxul.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

thunderbird.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

developer.thunderbird.net

today.com (Global: 773rd place; English: 432nd place)

w3.org (Global: 1,633rd place; English: 1,401st place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

  • Hirsch, Jared (September 2, 2018). "Life After XUL". Mozilla Developer Network (MDN). Mozilla. Archived from the original on November 29, 2018. Retrieved November 28, 2018.
  • King, Brian (February 5, 2003). "Remote Application Development with Mozilla, Part 2: A Case Study of the Mozilla Amazon Browser (MAB)". Oreillynet. Archived from the original on February 18, 2012. The Mozilla Amazon Browser is an interesting case study for a number of reasons. First, it's a working prototype application, not an example constructed solely for the purpose of demonstrating the technology. Second, it exercises many areas of Mozilla's support for remote development and thus shows off the capabilities, potential, and limitations of remote XUL applications. Finally, it demonstrates Mozilla's support for web services, an important emerging technology for web application development.
  • Straver, Markus (November 2, 2017). "UXP vs goanna". Archived from the original on November 11, 2020. Retrieved September 27, 2022. The plan is to switch Pale Moon over from our current platform to UXP (long-term plans) because a developed and maintained XUL-based platform is the only way a XUL application (like Pale Moon) has any chance of surviving without falling into obsolescence, with Mozilla abandoning this technology. That has been the main reason why I decided to start on this platform to begin with! Regardless, the platform will not be solely developed for Pale Moon's potential future use, it is developed for any future XUL application that will otherwise be dead in the water. Basically we're taking over the torch from Mozilla in developing and maintaining a platform for XUL applications of any kind; Mozilla should not be seen as "upstream" because it isn't.
  • Tobin, Matt. "There is only XUL". Archived from the original on September 17, 2018. Retrieved September 18, 2018.
  • "Gecko FAQ | MDN". developer.mozilla.org. Archived from the original on October 8, 2019. Retrieved January 5, 2021.
  • Castro, Jorge O. (June 15, 2004). "Ars Technica sits down with Scott Collins from Mozilla.org". Ars Technica. p. 2. Archived from the original on February 22, 2018. Retrieved November 28, 2018.
  • "The Box Model - Mozilla | MDN". December 9, 2017. Archived from the original on December 9, 2017. Retrieved January 5, 2021.

wicg.github.io (Global: low place; English: low place)

yoric.github.io (Global: low place; English: low place)