Aborto (Esperanto Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Aborto" in Esperanto language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Esperanto rank
1st place
1st place
2nd place
7th place
9,659th place
low place
195th place
64th place
4th place
9th place
3rd place
6th place
360th place
216th place
710th place
254th place
low place
low place
3,097th place
9,772nd place
1,116th place
751st place
152nd place
535th place
109th place
309th place
5th place
42nd place
129th place
1,188th place
low place
3,947th place
279th place
26th place

admin.ch

apnews.com

books.google.com

doi.org

  • (Oktobro 2020) “Self-managed medication abortion outcomes: results from a prospective pilot study”, Reproductive Health 17 (1), p. 164. doi:10.1186/s12978-020-01016-4. 
  • (Januaro 2022) “Effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion with accompaniment support in Argentina and Nigeria (SAFE): a prospective, observational cohort study and non-inferiority analysis with historical controls”, 'The Lancet. Global Health' 10 (1), p. e105–e113. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00461-7. 
  • (Oktobro 2015) “Evidence supporting broader access to safe legal abortion”, International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 131 (Suppl 1), p. S56–S59. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.018. “A strong body of accumulated evidence shows that the simple means to drastically reduce unsafe abortion-related maternal deaths and morbidity is to make abortion legal and institutional termination of pregnancy broadly accessible. [...] [C]riminalization of abortion only increases mortality and morbidity without decreasing the incidence of induced abortion, and that decriminalization rapidly reduces abortion-related mortality and does not increase abortion rates.”. 
  • (Januaro 2019) “Abortion laws reform may reduce maternal mortality: an ecological study in 162 countries”, BMC Women's Health 19 (1), p. 1. doi:10.1186/s12905-018-0705-y. 
  • (Majo 2022) “Medical methods for first trimester abortion”, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2022 (5), p. CD002855. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub5. 
  • (Septembro 2013) “A review of evidence for safe abortion care”, Contraception 88 (3), p. 350–363. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.027. 
  • (2014) “Abortion”, BMJ 348, p. f7553. doi:10.1136/bmj.f7553. 220108457. 
  • (Februaro 2012) “Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008”, Lancet 379 (9816), p. 625–632. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61786-8. 27378192. “Because few of the abortion estimates were based on studies of random samples of women, and because we did not use a model-based approach to estimate abortion incidence, it was not possible to compute confidence intervals based on standard errors around the estimates. Drawing on the information available on the accuracy and precision of abortion estimates that were used to develop the subregional, regional, and worldwide rates, we computed intervals of certainty around these rates (webappendix). We computed wider intervals for unsafe abortion rates than for safe abortion rates. The basis for these intervals included published and unpublished assessments of abortion reporting in countries with liberal laws, recently published studies of national unsafe abortion, and high and low estimates of the numbers of unsafe abortion developed by WHO.”. 
  • (Septembro 2007) “Legal abortion worldwide: incidence and recent trends”, International Family Planning Perspectives 33 (3), p. 106–116. doi:10.1363/3310607. 
  • (Julio 2010) “Critical gaps in universal access to reproductive health: contraception and prevention of unsafe abortion”, International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 110 (Suppl), p. S13–S16. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.04.003. 40586023. 
  • (September 2008) “Developments in laws on induced abortion: 1998-2007”, International Family Planning Perspectives 34 (3), p. 110–120. doi:10.1363/3411008. 

foreignpolicy.com

foxnews.com

guttmacher.org

  • Bankole A, Singh S, Haas T (1998). "Reasons Why Women Have Induced Abortions: Evidence from 27 Countries". International Family Planning Perspectives. 24 (3): 117–127, 152. doi:10.2307/3038208. JSTOR 3038208. Archived from the original on 17 January 2006. "Worldwide, the most commonly reported reason women cite for having an abortion is to postpone or stop childbearing. The second most common reason—socioeconomic concerns—includes disruption of education or employment; lack of support from the father; desire to provide schooling for existing children; and poverty, unemployment or inability to afford additional children. In addition, relationship problems with a husband or partner and a woman's perception that she is too young constitute other important categories of reasons. Women's characteristics are associated with their reasons for having an abortion: With few exceptions, older women and married women are the most likely to identify limiting childbearing as their main reason for abortion. - Conclusions - Reasons women give for why they seek abortion are often far more complex than simply not intending to become pregnant; the decision to have an abortion is usually motivated by more than one factor."
  • Induced Abortion Worldwide | Guttmacher Institute (2018-03-01). Arkivita el la originalo je 2018-03-01. Alirita 2023-06-23 .
  • (Februaro 2012) “Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008”, Lancet 379 (9816), p. 625–632. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61786-8. 27378192. “Because few of the abortion estimates were based on studies of random samples of women, and because we did not use a model-based approach to estimate abortion incidence, it was not possible to compute confidence intervals based on standard errors around the estimates. Drawing on the information available on the accuracy and precision of abortion estimates that were used to develop the subregional, regional, and worldwide rates, we computed intervals of certainty around these rates (webappendix). We computed wider intervals for unsafe abortion rates than for safe abortion rates. The basis for these intervals included published and unpublished assessments of abortion reporting in countries with liberal laws, recently published studies of national unsafe abortion, and high and low estimates of the numbers of unsafe abortion developed by WHO.”. 
  • (Septembro 2007) “Legal abortion worldwide: incidence and recent trends”, International Family Planning Perspectives 33 (3), p. 106–116. doi:10.1363/3310607. 
  • Induced Abortion Worldwide. Guttmacher Institute (2018-03-01). Arkivita el la originalo je 23a de Februaro 2020. Alirita 2020-02-21 . “Of the world's 1.64 billion women of reproductive age, 6% live where abortion is banned outright, and 37% live where it is allowed without restriction as to reason. Most women live in countries with laws that fall between these two extremes.”.
  • Unintended Pregnancy and Abortion Worldwide (angle) (2020-05-28). Arkivita el la originalo je 23a de Februaro 2020. Alirita 2021-03-09 . “Abortion is sought and needed even in settings where it is restricted—that is, in countries where it is prohibited altogether or is allowed only to save the women’s life or to preserve her physical or mental health. Unintended pregnancy rates are highest in countries that restrict abortion access and lowest in countries where abortion is broadly legal. As a result, abortion rates are similar in countries where abortion is restricted and those where the procedure is broadly legal (i.e., where it is available on request or on socioeconomic grounds).”.
  • (September 2008) “Developments in laws on induced abortion: 1998-2007”, International Family Planning Perspectives 34 (3), p. 110–120. doi:10.1363/3411008. 

huffingtonpost.com

merckmanuals.com

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Chae S, Desai S, Crowell M, Sedgh G (1a de Oktobro 2017). "Reasons why women have induced abortions: a synthesis of findings from 14 countries". Contraception. 96 (4): 233–241. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.06.014. PMC 5957082. PMID 28694165. "In most countries, the most frequently cited reasons for having an abortion were socioeconomic concerns or limiting childbearing. With some exceptions, little variation existed in the reasons given by women's sociodemographic characteristics. Data from three countries where multiple reasons could be reported in the survey showed that women often have more than one reason for having an abortion."
  • Stotland NL (Julio 2019). "Update on Reproductive Rights and Women's Mental Health". The Medical Clinics of North America. 103 (4): 751–766. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2019.02.006. PMID 31078205. S2CID 153307516.
  • Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, Romero M, Ganatra B, Okonofua FE, Shah IH (25 November 2006). "Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic". Lancet. 368 (9550): 1908–1919. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69481-6. PMID 17126724. S2CID 6188636. p. 1
    Citaĵo
     Unsafe abortion is a persistent, preventable pandemic. [...] By contrast, legal abortion in industrialised nations has emerged as one of the safest procedures in contemporary medical practice, with minimum morbidity and a negligible risk of death. 
  • Raymond EG, Grossman D, Weaver MA, Toti S, Winikoff B (November 2014). "Mortality of induced abortion, other outpatient surgical procedures and common activities in the United States". Contraception. 90 (5): 476–479. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.012. PMID 25152259. "Results: The abortion-related mortality rate in 2000–2009 in the United States was 0.7 per 100,000 abortions. Studies in approximately the same years found mortality rates of 0.8-1.7 deaths per 100,000 plastic surgery procedures, 0-1.7 deaths per 100,000 dental procedures, 0.6-1.2 deaths per 100,000 marathons run and at least 4 deaths among 100,000 cyclists in a large annual bicycling event. The traffic fatality rate per 758 vehicle miles traveled by passenger cars in the United States in 2007-2011 was about equal to the abortion-related mortality rate. Conclusions: The safety of induced abortion as practiced in the United States for the past decade met or exceeded expectations for outpatient surgical procedures and compared favorably to that of two common nonmedical voluntary activities."

nichd.nih.gov

oed.com

oxforddictionaries.com

en.oxforddictionaries.com

  • Abortion (noun). Oxford Living Dictionaries. Arkivita el la originalo je 28a de Majo 2018. Alirita 8a de Junio 2018 . “[mass noun] The deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy”.

profamilia.de

srhr.org

web.archive.org

who.int

who.int

whqlibdoc.who.int

worldcat.org