Asedio de Jerusalén (587 a. C.) (Spanish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Asedio de Jerusalén (587 a. C.)" in Spanish language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Spanish rank
487th place
48th place
194th place
612th place
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
57th place
3rd place
2nd place
2nd place
low place
low place
1,766th place
950th place
4,036th place
272nd place
low place
low place
6th place
5th place
26th place
56th place
2,112th place
686th place
4th place
4th place
low place
low place

aciprensa.com

ec.aciprensa.com

archive.org

  • Malamat, Abraham (1968). «The Last Kings of Judah and the Fall of Jerusalem: An Historical – Chronological Study». Israel Exploration Journal 18 (3): 137-56. JSTOR 27925138. «The discrepancy between the length of the siege according to the regnal years of Zedekiah (years 9–11), on the one hand, and its length according to Jehoiachin's exile (years 9–12), on the other, can be cancelled out only by supposing the former to have been reckoned on a Tishri basis, and the latter on a Nisan basis. The difference of one year between the two is accounted for by the fact that the termination of the siege fell in the summer, between Nisan and Tishri, already in the 12th year according to the reckoning in Ezekiel, but still in Zedekiah's 11th year which was to end only in Tishri.» 

biblegateway.com

doi.org

dx.doi.org

formerthings.com

issn.org

portal.issn.org

jstor.org

  • Malamat, Abraham (1968). «The Last Kings of Judah and the Fall of Jerusalem: An Historical – Chronological Study». Israel Exploration Journal 18 (3): 137-56. JSTOR 27925138. «The discrepancy between the length of the siege according to the regnal years of Zedekiah (years 9–11), on the one hand, and its length according to Jehoiachin's exile (years 9–12), on the other, can be cancelled out only by supposing the former to have been reckoned on a Tishri basis, and the latter on a Nisan basis. The difference of one year between the two is accounted for by the fact that the termination of the siege fell in the summer, between Nisan and Tishri, already in the 12th year according to the reckoning in Ezekiel, but still in Zedekiah's 11th year which was to end only in Tishri.» 

jw.org

wol.jw.org

machonshilo.org

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

plos.org

journals.plos.org

tafj.org

  • «The Destruction of Jerusalem: 586BCE or 607 BCE?». Consultado el 19 de agosto de 2019. «“The accepted date for Nebuchadnezzar’s destruction of Jerusalem is generally 587/586 BC. Our Curator of Middle East Archaeology recommends reading David Noel Freedman’s chapter entitled “The Chronology of Israel and the Ancient Near East,” in E. Ernest Wright’s (edited) The Bible and the Ancient Near East ,A Doubleday Anchor Book, 1965. This book provides both biblical chronology and the chronologies of other contemporary countries, some of the arguments, and a chart of the Near East.” The Smithsonian Institute». 

web.archive.org

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

wikiwix.com

archive.wikiwix.com