Rivet, Eric; Stenzel, Michael (22 de abril de 2011). «Classes of Destroyer Escorts». History of Destroyer Escorts. Destroyer Escort Historical Museum. Archivado desde el original el 29 de diciembre de 2019. Consultado el 8 de julio de 2012. «The Cannon class was very similar in design to the Buckley class, the primary difference being a diesel-electric power plant instead of the Buckley class's turboelectric design. The fuel-efficient diesel-electric plant greatly improved the range of the Cannon class, but at the cost of speed.»
Rivet, Eric; Stenzel, Michael (22 de abril de 2011). «Classes of Destroyer Escorts». History of Destroyer Escorts. Destroyer Escort Historical Museum. Archivado desde el original el 29 de diciembre de 2019. Consultado el 8 de julio de 2012. «Except for the propulsion, the EDSALL class was nearly identical to the CANNON class in every respect. This fourth class of destroyer escorts mounted a direct-drive diesel configuration that proved to be extremely reliable.»
web.archive.org
Rivet, Eric; Stenzel, Michael (22 de abril de 2011). «Classes of Destroyer Escorts». History of Destroyer Escorts. Destroyer Escort Historical Museum. Archivado desde el original el 29 de diciembre de 2019. Consultado el 8 de julio de 2012. «The Cannon class was very similar in design to the Buckley class, the primary difference being a diesel-electric power plant instead of the Buckley class's turboelectric design. The fuel-efficient diesel-electric plant greatly improved the range of the Cannon class, but at the cost of speed.»
Rivet, Eric; Stenzel, Michael (22 de abril de 2011). «Classes of Destroyer Escorts». History of Destroyer Escorts. Destroyer Escort Historical Museum. Archivado desde el original el 29 de diciembre de 2019. Consultado el 8 de julio de 2012. «Except for the propulsion, the EDSALL class was nearly identical to the CANNON class in every respect. This fourth class of destroyer escorts mounted a direct-drive diesel configuration that proved to be extremely reliable.»
