Climagate (Spanish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Climagate" in Spanish language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank Spanish rank
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
38th place
69th place
7th place
10th place
25th place
47th place
11th place
19th place
89th place
6th place
3,940th place
288th place
40th place
70th place
437th place
445th place
94th place
171st place
207th place
164th place
1,041st place
1,075th place
109th place
143rd place
35th place
71st place
254th place
366th place
382nd place
136th place
low place
low place
1,110th place
1,191st place
33rd place
3rd place
1,819th place
2,608th place

allvoices.com (Global: low place; Spanish: low place)

bbc.co.uk (Global: 11th place; Spanish: 19th place)

news.bbc.co.uk

elpais.com (Global: 89th place; Spanish: 6th place)

google.com (Global: 109th place; Spanish: 143rd place)

gpo.gov (Global: 1,819th place; Spanish: 2,608th place)

  • Biello, David (Feb., 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. ISSN 0036-8733. "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "...the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

guardian.co.uk (Global: 382nd place; Spanish: 136th place)

issn.org (Global: 33rd place; Spanish: 3rd place)

portal.issn.org

  • Biello, David (Feb., 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. ISSN 0036-8733. "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "...the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

libertaddigital.com (Global: 3,940th place; Spanish: 288th place)

nature.com (Global: 207th place; Spanish: 164th place)

  • Kurt Kleiner: Climate science in 2009, en Nature Reports Climate Change- Published online: 17 December 2009 | doi:10.1038/climate.2010.134

newscientist.com (Global: 1,041st place; Spanish: 1,075th place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; Spanish: 10th place)

  • Revkin, Andrew C. (27 de noviembre de 2009). «Hacked E-Mail Data Prompts Calls for Changes in Climate Research». New York Times. Consultado el 28 de noviembre de 2009. «Un intenso debate sobre el significado del material pirateado estalló tan pronto como los mensajes de correo electrónico y otros documentos que aparecieron en los sitios Web poco más de una semana. Algunos ven en la correspondencia de correo electrónico - que incluye las acaloradas discusiones sobre las tendencias de calentamiento, el asesoramiento sobre la eliminación de emails potencialmente controvertidos y comentarios despectivos acerca de los escépticos del clima - las pruebas de una conspiración para acallar las opiniones disidentes y retener los datos del escrutinio público, o, como algunos lo han dicho, "Climategate.”».
  • Revkin, Andrew C. (20 de noviembre de 2009). «Hacked E-Mail Is New Fodder for Climate Dispute». The New York Times.

reuters.com (Global: 38th place; Spanish: 69th place)

scientificamerican.com (Global: 1,110th place; Spanish: 1,191st place)

  • Biello, David (Feb., 2010). "Negating 'Climategate'". Scientific American. (302):2. 16. ISSN 0036-8733. "In fact, nothing in the stolen material undermines the scientific consensus that climate change is happening and that humans are to blame"; See also: Lubchenco, Jane (2 December 2009) House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming (House Select Committee). "The Administration's View on the State of Climate Science". House Hearing, 111 Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. "...the e-mails really do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus and the independent scientific analyses of thousands of scientists around the world that tell us that the Earth is warming and that the warming is largely a result of human activities." As quoted in the report published by Office of Inspector General.

telegraph.co.uk (Global: 40th place; Spanish: 70th place)

blogs.telegraph.co.uk

timesonline.co.uk (Global: 437th place; Spanish: 445th place)

uea.ac.uk (Global: low place; Spanish: low place)

washingtonpost.com (Global: 35th place; Spanish: 71st place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Spanish: 1st place)

webcitation.org (Global: 25th place; Spanish: 47th place)

wired.com (Global: 254th place; Spanish: 366th place)

wsj.com (Global: 94th place; Spanish: 171st place)

online.wsj.com