Forsythe, David (2005). The humanitarians: the International Committee of the Red Cross. Cambridge University Press. p. 73. ISBN978-0-521-84828-2. «The ICRC publicly stated that the building of Jewish settlements in the territories, the Israeli use of collective punishments, the destruction of Arab houses as punishment, the expulsion of Arabs from the territories, and the seizing of Arab lands and resources without compelling military necessity, inter alia, all violated the Fourth GC.»
Benveniśtî, Eyāl (2004). The international law of occupation. Princeton University Press. p. 108. ISBN0-691-12130-3. «This purported annexation was, however, widely regarded as illegal and void, by the Arab League and others, and was recognized only by Britain, Iraq, and Pakistan.»
George Washington University. Law School (2005). The George Washington international law review. George Washington University. p. 390. Consultado el 21 de diciembre de 2010. «Jordan's illegal occupation and Annexation of the West Bank».
Roberts, Adam. «Prolonged Military Occupation: The Israeli-Occupied Territories Since 1967». The American Journal of International Law (American Society of International Law) 84 (1): 85-86. doi:10.2307/2203016. «The international community has taken a critical view of both deportations and settlements as being contrary to international law. General Assembly resolutions have condemned the deportations since 1969, and have done so by overwhelming majorities in recent years. Likewise, they have consistently deplored the establishment of settlements, and have done so by overwhelming majorities throughout the period (since the end of 1976) of the rapid expansion in their numbers. The Security Council has also been critical of deportations and settlements; and other bodies have viewed them as an obstacle to peace, and illegal under international law.»
Barak-Erez, Daphne (2006). «Israel: The security barrier—between international law, constitutional law, and domestic judicial review». International Journal of Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press) 4 (3): 548. doi:10.1093/icon/mol021. «The real controversy hovering over all the litigation on the security barrier concerns the fate of the Israeli settlements in the occupied territories. Since 1967, Israel has allowed and even encouraged its citizens to live in the new settlements established in the territories, motivated by religious and national sentiments attached to the history of the Jewish nation in the land of Israel. This policy has also been justified in terms of security interests, taking into consideration the dangerous geographic circumstances of Israel before 1967 (where Israeli areas on the Mediterranean coast were potentially threatened by Jordanian control of the West Bank ridge). The international community, for its part, has viewed this policy as patently illegal, based on the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention that prohibit moving populations to or from territories under occupation.»
Roberts, Adam. «Prolonged Military Occupation: The Israeli-Occupied Territories Since 1967». The American Journal of International Law (American Society of International Law) 84 (1): 69. doi:10.2307/2203016. «La resolución 446 del Consejo de Seguridad de las Naciones Unidas (22 de marzo de 1979), adoptada por 12 votos a favor, 3 abstenciones (Noruega, Reino Unido y los Estados Unidos) y ningún voto en contra, reafirmó la aplicabilidad de la cuarta Convención de Ginebra y se opuso al establecimiento de asentamientos israelíes en los territorios ocupados.»
de Waart, Paul J. I. M. International Court of Justice Firmly Walled in the Law of Power in the Israeli–Palestinian Peace Process18. Leiden Journal of International Law. pp. 467-487.|fechaacceso= requiere |url= (ayuda)doi10.1017/S0922156505002839
Roberts, Adam (1 de enero de 1990). «Prolonged Military Occupation: The Israeli-Occupied Territories Since 1967». The American Journal of International Law84 (1): 44–103 [69]. ISSN0002-9300. JSTOR2203016. doi:10.2307/2203016. «The view that the fourth Geneva Convention is applicable, and should be applied, in all the territories occupied by Israel in 1967 has been very widely held internationally. Indeed, a remarkable degree of unanimity prevails on this matter. Countless international organizations, both intergovernmental and nongovernmental, have taken this view. Within the UN General Assembly, it has been upheld from the beginning of the occupation».
Statement by the International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, 5 December 2001. International Committee of the Red Cross. 12 de mayo de 2001. Archivado desde el original el 15 de noviembre de 2015. Consultado el 29 de agosto de 2015. «the ICRC has expressed growing concern about the consequences in humanitarian terms of the establishment of Israeli settlements in the occupied territories, in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention.»
ilo.org
International Labour Organization (2005). «The situation of workers of the occupied Arab territories». p. 14. «The international community considers Israeli settlements within the occupied territories illegal and in breach of, inter alia, United Nations Security Council resolution 465 of 1 March 1980 calling on Israel ‹to dismantle the existing settlements and in particular to cease, on an urgent basis, the establishment, construction and planning of settlements in the Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem›.»
issn.org
portal.issn.org
Time Inc (12 de marzo de 1971). LIFE. Time Inc. p. 32. ISSN0024-3019.
Roberts, Adam (1 de enero de 1990). «Prolonged Military Occupation: The Israeli-Occupied Territories Since 1967». The American Journal of International Law84 (1): 44–103 [69]. ISSN0002-9300. JSTOR2203016. doi:10.2307/2203016. «The view that the fourth Geneva Convention is applicable, and should be applied, in all the territories occupied by Israel in 1967 has been very widely held internationally. Indeed, a remarkable degree of unanimity prevails on this matter. Countless international organizations, both intergovernmental and nongovernmental, have taken this view. Within the UN General Assembly, it has been upheld from the beginning of the occupation».
Roberts, Adam (1 de enero de 1990). «Prolonged Military Occupation: The Israeli-Occupied Territories Since 1967». The American Journal of International Law84 (1): 44–103 [69]. ISSN0002-9300. JSTOR2203016. doi:10.2307/2203016. «The view that the fourth Geneva Convention is applicable, and should be applied, in all the territories occupied by Israel in 1967 has been very widely held internationally. Indeed, a remarkable degree of unanimity prevails on this matter. Countless international organizations, both intergovernmental and nongovernmental, have taken this view. Within the UN General Assembly, it has been upheld from the beginning of the occupation».
Rozen, Laura (2 de noviembre de 2009). «Clinton walks back Israel settlements remarks». POLITICO.com. «And the Obama Administration's position on settlements is clear, unequivocal. It has not changed. And as the President has said on many occasions, the United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements».
Statement by the International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, 5 December 2001. International Committee of the Red Cross. 12 de mayo de 2001. Archivado desde el original el 15 de noviembre de 2015. Consultado el 29 de agosto de 2015. «the ICRC has expressed growing concern about the consequences in humanitarian terms of the establishment of Israeli settlements in the occupied territories, in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention.»
