R. v. Starr, [2000 2 SCR 144, 242] (SCC 2000). “In my view, an effective way to define the reasonable doubt standard for a jury is to explain that it falls much closer to absolute certainty than to proof on a balance of probabilities.”
What Are the Origins of Reasonable Doubt?, HNN.us, February 25, 2008.
lawcom.govt.nz
Young, Warren; Tinsley, Yvette, Neil (noviembre de 1999). Juries in Criminal Trials: Part Two(PDF). Preliminary Paper 37 2. Wellington, New Zealand: Law Commission. p. 54. ISBN1-877187-42-9. Archivado desde el original el 9 de febrero de 2013. Consultado el 14 de abril de 2012.|last2= y |autor2= redundantes (ayuda)
ssrn.com
Grechenig, Nicklisch & Thoeni, Punishment Despite Reasonable Doubt - A Public Goods Experiment with Sanctions under Uncertainty, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (JELS) 2010, vol. 7 (4), p. 847-867 (ssrn).
web.archive.org
Young, Warren; Tinsley, Yvette, Neil (noviembre de 1999). Juries in Criminal Trials: Part Two(PDF). Preliminary Paper 37 2. Wellington, New Zealand: Law Commission. p. 54. ISBN1-877187-42-9. Archivado desde el original el 9 de febrero de 2013. Consultado el 14 de abril de 2012.|last2= y |autor2= redundantes (ayuda)